【周末荐读】美联储圣路易斯主席James Bullard：是否应该推进美国货币政策的正常化？（附英文报道）

观点速递5月23日晚，由中国人民大学国际货币研究所（IMI）与国际货币金融机构官方论坛（OMFIF）联合举办的2016城市论坛在北京举行。美联储圣路易斯联储主席、美联储货币政策会议成员詹姆士·布拉德（James Bullard）出席论坛并发表演讲。演讲对目前联邦公开市场委员会和市场之间围绕美国货币政策是否应该实现正常化的争论进行了阐述。一方面，数据显示，近期美国劳动力市场的持续走强、通胀水平接近美联储2%的通胀目标、国际阻力也存在一定程度的减弱。基于此，联邦公开市场委员会主张推行政策利率逐步提升，从而逐渐实现美国货币政策的正常化；另一方面，从市场角度看，基于美国真实国内生产总值增速下降和市场对美国未来通胀预期水平下降，市场对是否应该实现货币政策的正常化持相对消极的态度，更倾向于暂时维持宽松的货币政策环境。 以下为英文报道全文：

BEIJING, China – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard discussed “Slow Normalization or No Normalization?” at the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum’s (OMFIF) City Lecture on Monday.

Bullard noted that recent U.S. monetary policy discussions have been dominated by issues related to the possible pace of increase in the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) policy rate. He discussed two views regarding the expected policy rate path: the FOMC’s scenario and the market-based scenario.

“The FOMC has laid out, via the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), a data-dependent ‘slow normalization,’ whereby the nominal policy rate would gradually rise over the next several years provided the economy evolves as expected,” he said. “Market-based forecasts of FOMC policy, in contrast, envision ‘almost no normalization,’ whereby the policy rate would be changed only a few times in the next several years.”

Bullard briefly compared and contrasted each view, starting first with the FOMC’s scenario.

The FOMC’s Scenario—Slow Normalization

He cited three factors in favor of the FOMC’s scenario of a slow normalization of the U.S. policy rate: relatively strong U.S. labor markets, inflation measurements moving closer to the FOMC’s target of 2 percent, and waning international headwinds.

Strong U.S. Labor Markets

“By nearly any metric, U.S. labor markets are at or beyond full employment,” Bullard said. For example, he noted that job openings per available worker are at a cyclical low, unemployment insurance claims relative to the size of the labor force are at a multi-decade low, and nonfarm payroll employment growth has been above longer-run trends. In addition, the level of a labor market conditions index created by staff at the Board of Governors continues to be well above average.

“In short, labor markets are relatively tight,” he said. “This may put upward pressure on inflation going forward.”

U.S. Inflation Closer to Target

While inflation has been relatively low in the U.S. during the last several years, Bullard explained that large movements in oil prices have had a major impact on headline inflation. “Measures intended to give an indication of inflation movements net of oil price effects have been trending somewhat higher,” he said.

Thus, he noted that the FOMC’s projection of a slow rise in U.S. inflation as the effects of a stronger dollar and a decline in oil prices wear off appears to be happening, as indicated by the rise in smoothed measures of inflation over the last year.

International Headwinds Waning

Bullard then turned to the discussion of the impact of negative global factors on the U.S. economy and how some of these factors appear to be dissipating during the first half of 2016.

“International headwinds affecting the U.S. economy have been widely discussed in global financial markets during the last several years,” he said. “Recent negative international influences on the U.S. economy appear to be waning.”

He looked at two factors that have been widely cited in the international headwinds discussion: global financial stress and the negative impact of a stronger dollar on U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth.

“Measures of U.S. financial stress indicate that stress has fallen off its peak earlier this year,” he said. Regarding the second headwind, Bullard noted that the dollar appreciated mostly during the second half of 2014, coinciding with the run-up to the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing program. “This appeared to have had a substantial effect on the net exports contribution to U.S. GDP growth during the winter of 2014-2015,” he said. “Since then, however, the effects of a stronger dollar appear to be waning.”

The Market-Based Scenario—Almost No Normalization

Bullard then discussed two factors in favor of the market-based scenario of almost no normalization of the U.S. policy rate: the slow U.S. real GDP growth and low U.S. inflation expectations.

U.S. Real GDP Growth Below Trend

Bullard noted that real GDP growth has been slower than trend in recent quarters, with first-quarter real GDP growing at an annual rate of just 0.5 percent, according to the most recent estimate. This estimate may be influenced by the “residual seasonality” issue, he said, explaining that first-quarter real GDP has been low since 2009.

“Still, combining actual data from the second half of 2015, the first quarter of 2016, and tracking estimates for the current quarter, the suggestion is that the U.S. is growing below a trend pace of 2 percent,” he said.

“The slower, below-trend pace of recent U.S. growth is inconsistent with a slowly rising path for the policy rate,” he explained.

U.S. Inflation Expectations Still Too Low

Looking at market-based measures of U.S. inflation expectations, Bullard noted that while they were relatively satisfactory during the summer of 2014, they fell with oil prices during 2014 and renewed a downward trend beginning in late 2015. “Recently, market-based inflation expectations have recovered somewhat,” he said. “However, expectations remain low compared with the levels observed in the summer of 2014.”

He noted that market-based measures of inflation expectations tied to the Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) market are based on consumer price index (CPI) inflation, but that the FOMC’s target is based on personal consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation. The latter generally runs about 30 basis points lower.

“Current readings on TIPS-based inflation compensation are difficult to reconcile with credible longer-run FOMC policy to maintain an inflation target of 2 percent PCE inflation,” he said.

Summary of the Two Views

To sum up, the FOMC median projection for the policy rate suggests a gradual pace of rate increases over the next several years, Bullard said. At the same time, the market-based expectation for the policy rate is much shallower, with only a few increases over the forecast horizon—that is, almost no normalization.

“U.S. evidence from labor markets, actual inflation readings and global influences suggests the FOMC median projection may be more nearly correct,” he said. Meanwhile, “U.S. evidence from recent readings on GDP growth and market-based inflation expectations suggests the market view of the path of the policy rate may be more nearly correct.”

观点整理：景麟德图文编辑：聂思宇

点击查看近期热文

欢迎加入群聊

为了增进与粉丝们的互动，IMI财经观察将建立微信交流群，欢迎大家参与。大家可将自己的个人信息（需实名认证）和微信发送至后台，经群主审核后，即可被拉进群。
欢迎读者朋友多多留言与我们交流互动，推荐好文章可联系：邮箱[e-mail]；电话[phone]

关于我们
中国人民大学国际货币研究所（IMI）成立于2009年12月20日，是专注于货币金融理论、政策与战略研究的非营利性学术研究机构和新型专业智库。
中国人民银行副行长潘功胜与诺贝尔经济学奖得主蒙代尔出任IMI顾问委员会主任，委员包括王兆星、埃德蒙、苏宁、任志刚、李若谷、亚辛·安瓦尔、李扬、汉克、夏斌等9位国内外著名经济学家或政策领导人；中国人民银行副行长陈雨露出任学术委员会主任，委员会由46位来自国内外科研院所、政府部门或金融机构的著名专家学者组成。
自2012年起，研究所开始每年定期发布《人民币国际化报告》，重点探讨人民币国际化进程中面临的重大理论与政策问题。报告还被译成英文、日文、韩文、俄文、阿拉伯文等版本并在北京、香港、纽约、法兰克福、伦敦、新加坡和阿拉木图等地发布，引起国内外理论与实务界的广泛关注。
迄今为止，研究所已形成“人民币国际化与国际金融”、“宏观经济理论与政策”、“互联网金融”、“银行与财富管理”、“金融监管”、等五个研究方向，并定期举办货币金融圆桌会议、大金融思想沙龙、燕山论坛、麦金农大讲坛、陶湘国际金融讲堂等具有重要学术影响力的高层次系列论坛或讲座。主要学术产品包括IMI大金融书系、《国际货币评论》（中文月刊&英文季刊）、《IMI研究动态》（周刊）、《国际货币金融每日综述》（日刊）等。国际货币网：www.imi.org.cn
微信号：IMI财经观察（点击识别下方二维码关注我们）