【少儿禁】马建《亮出你的舌苔或空空荡荡》

去泰国看了一场“成人秀”,画面尴尬到让人窒息.....

从禁止中国人员进入实验室、到“准入天宫”,时隔两个月反转太大

2021年推特网黄粉丝排名Top10 (文末福利)

​孟羽童离开董明珠的真相

生成图片,分享到微信朋友圈

自由微信安卓APP发布,立即下载! | 提交文章网址
查看原文

Why wasn’t my residence permit renewed?

Reliant Team Reliant 睿来 2023-01-03

Click "Reliant 睿来" to follow us!


Perhaps I know best why it is man alone who laughs; he alone suffers so deeply that he had to invent laughter.

    -  Friedrich Nietzsche


One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

    - Albert Camus




Sometimes “memes” really are funny. They can capture the spirit of a moment in a glance and unlike jokes there is no timing to get wrong. The meme of this moment and the last few months features a hapless foreigner talking to a Chinese immigration officer across a desk. The foreigner asks about extending his time in China and is told by the officer that he has to leave in 30 days. The foreigner responds by telling the officer that he has a wife and children here in China, and the officer responds “Not anymore.”


Part of what makes memes (and jokes) funny is that they touch on at least a kernel of truth, often an unpleasant truth, and it is with that laughter that truth is easier to face. That bit of wisdom is likely shared by our hapless foreigner in the meme and that most mustachioed and misunderstood philosopher in the first epigraph.


In the last few months more and more foreigners working in China, some who have been for many years, have found themselves, to greater or lesser extents, living that moment in the meme. The disappointment and disbelief that the life they had made in China can suddenly slip away in a moment becoming all to real.


You can, and probably should, take Nietzsche’s advice and laugh at your misfortune because then at least you have the palliative of laughter. Or you take the same advice from Camus and imagine Sisyphus, in other words you and me and everyone, happy, despite or even because of all that absurd business with the boulder and the hill. While Reliant might not be able to fix your situation, we might be able to sate one of those other human, all to human, desires, the will to comprehension that drives us to make sense of even the absurd.


For many, the sudden denial of a document certainly seems absurd. If you had been able to get a residence permit for work (RPw) in past, why are you now refused one now? If you have gotten a work permit (WP) which usually leads to the subsequent issuance of a an RPw, why are things different this time? And what, if anything, can you do about it?


To understand what is happening with RPws now, we need to review a bit about bureaucracy. First, there are two different government bodies that deal with the WP and the RPw. The WP is managed by the what we at Reliant call the Foreign Expert Bureau (FEB), technically the WP approval and cancellations processes are under the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and in many places the FEB will be called the Science and Technology Bureau (科技局) but for the sake of consistency we use FEB. But knowing about the FEB alone is not sufficient, because the FEB does not approve, issue, nor manage the RPw. That is the purview of the Exit and Entry Administration (EEA), a part of the Public Security Bureau (PSB). While the FEB are office workers, the EEA are part of the security apparatus and have the uniforms to show it.


A necessary, but not sufficient, condition for obtaining an RPw is that one have a WP (and the corresponding approval document, the 准予行政许可决定书). And here is where many people have become confused. Reliant has recently seen many cases in which the WP was issued by the FEB, but the EEA then refused to issue the RPw. It is the institutional separation between the FEB and the EEA, ironic as more joint centers open that locate FEB and EEA service windows next to each other to increase convenience for applicants, that means WP approval with RPw denial has always been possible, even if it was rare in past.


In many recent cases, applicants who have been issued WPs are subsequently denied RPws. In most of these cases, it turns out that the applicant had a prior record of administrative punishment, this usually being for illegal employment (Exit and Entry Administration Law of the Peoples Republic of China [EEAL] 80) or illegal residence (overstay) (EEAL 78) or a related issue such as failing to update an RP within the ten day limit  (EEAL 33, 76). In some cases, the record was only for a warning, not a fine, but a formal written warning is still an administrative punishment. In many cases, the records of administrative punishment were from years ago, and the applicant had been able to obtain both WP(s) and RPw(s) subsequent to the issuance of the administrative punishment decision but prior to the recent denial of an RPw. Perhaps this is true of the hapless foreigner in the meme who is about to separated from his wife and children.


Technically, the EEA is not supposed to issue RPs to foreigners who are “not eligible to reside in China because of violation of relevant Chinese laws or administrative regulations” (EEAL 31.4; RAEEF 21.3). Offenses like working or residing in China illegally are violations of the EEAL and the Regulations of the Peoples Republic of China on Administration of the Entry and Exit of Foreigners (RAEEF), and those are both the most relevant law and administrative regulation when it comes to matters of foreign stay and  residence in China, and the most relevant law and regulation for the EEA as an organization. So it is best to understand that prior to the present crackdown, the EEA had been very lenient about enforcing its obligation to not issue residence permits, perhaps looking the other way for many people who technically should not have been issued RPs. This tolerant and generous attitude went into overdrive during the pandemic with the 60 day automatic extension policy and the issuance of multiple consecutive stay permits, often for up to a year or more in cumulative duration.

 

Now it appears the pendulum has swung back and we are in a period of strict enforcement. Part of this might be a reaction to the period of leniency during the height of the pandemic. It may have to due with the imposition of the Dual Reduction reforms in the education sector where many foreigners are employed. It may be related to the upcoming Winter Olympics and even other major events in 2022. It could even be the result of technology upgrades at the EEA. Since there is no public announcement of a stricter enforcement regime, nor will there be one, understanding the why is ultimately speculation, no better than tea leaf reading. What can be explained, as above, is the mechanics of how one might suddenly be denied an RPw for something that happened years ago, and after which one has gotten other RPws, or how one could be a approved for a WP but not for the RPw based on that WP, making the WP alone pretty much useless.


Admittedly knowing the how and not the why is little comfort, but even knowing the why would not allow us to change things, at least not the things that have already happened. The lesson moving forward is twofold. One, pay close attention to the legality of your employment and residence situation. If an employer proposes something that screams obvious illegality - like the common “this contract is just to show the government to get the visa” - do not be a part of it as it may catch up with you, even years later, in unexpected ways.  


Two is where we come full circle back to our hapless foreigner and our continental  philosophers. Laugh and imagine Sisyphus happy.


References


(1) Exit Entry Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (EEAL)

http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/laws_regulations/2014/09/22/content_281474988553532.htm 

中华人民共和国出境入境管理法

http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2012-06/30/content_2174944.htm 

 

(2) Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Administration of the Entry and Exit of Foreigners (RAEEF)

http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/laws_regulations/2014/09/22/content_281474988553545.htm 

中华人民共和国外国人入境出境管理条例

http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/22/content_2452453.htm



Reliant Services


Reliant Legal Consulting Ltd. provides solutions for labor disputes, work permit problems, and residence permit, visa, and stay permit issues. Contact us for more information:


WeChat ID:  Reliant-CN 

E-mail: info@reliant.work




Reliant’s Official Wechat account: ReliantInfo


Main Articles



Wreck of The Old 37 or How not to quit your job

Explains why giving 30 days notice is usually not the best way to quit your job



Labor Dispute … Got a plan? You'll need one

Explains several important factors in China labor disputes



Why Your “Work Visa” Won't Work

Explains why you don’t have a “work visa,” what you do have, and how you got it



Why Employer Fines are not Fine

Explains why it is not fine for employers to impose fines on their workers.



Is it legal to work for an “agency” if you teach at a school?

Explains the legal issues for foreigners in the education industry who work for an “agency.”



China’s Educapocalypse?

Explains what is behind the "Two Reductions" policy and challenges the policy might encounter as well as some it might create



Can your employer cancel your visa without your passport?

Explains when and how leaving a job can put your right to stay in China in jeopardy



What is supposed to happen to my permits after I resign?Explains Work and Residence Permit cancellation



Official List of Native English Speaking Regions and Countries

Explains which countries are considered native English speaking for work permit purposes



Is it illegal for non native speakers to teach English in China

Explains the status of non native English speaking English teachers



Work Permit cancelled. What about my Residence Permit

Explains different practices for dealing the Residence Permit when changing jobs in China



How to negotiate in a labor dispute

Explains how to negotiate in a China labor dispute



Your PPE: Pandemic Pay Explained, Force Majeure & Normal Labor

Explains pay during the pandemic and force majeure


Your PPE: Pandemic Pay Explained 薪水的防护服

Explains pay during the pandemic and force majeure in English and Chinese



End of the 60 Day Extension: What to do? Permits vs. Visas

Explains the 60 day automatic visa/RP extension and the differences between visas, residence permits, and stay permits



Stuck Outside China:  The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

Explains work and pay options for those stuck outside China


Reliant on the Law





Do you have to carry your passport?Explains the legal basis for carrying your passport and how that can help improve your “document hygiene.”

Wages in a work stoppageExplains how wages should be paid during pandemic work stoppages and other work stoppages that are not the fault of the workers.

Documents you need to legally work in China (EEAL 41; RAEFC 8)

Explains why a Z visa does not make it legal to work in China as a “foreigner” and what does.
Work Permit is Proof of Labor RelationshipExplains that a contract is not enough to form a legal labor relationship for foreigners in China

Who keeps your work permit card?

Explains who should keep the work permit card and other documents with practical tips on managing your important work related documents.

My employer won’t give me release documents. Is that legal?

Explains aspects of the law around release documents


Labor Contract Termination

Explains law around terminating labor contracts


Severance Pay

Explains law around severance pay 


Breach Penalties

Explains why you usually do not have to pay any penalty to end a labor contract




2022 China Holiday Calendar

Explains which days off are actually holidays, which are shifted rest days, and what this means for your pay.



Copyright Notice版权声明

This article is the author's original, non-profit work product. The original author and publishing information must be retained in any reproductions. For commercial use, please contact the author: info@reliant.org.cn.


本文为作者原创,非盈利性质的转载须保留作者和原文网址。商业用途请联系info@reliant.org.cn。

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存