韩云波 | 新征程上的中国社会科学学术期刊话语权——基于中国自主知识体系构建分析

学术期刊话语权专题

新征程上的中国社会科学学术期刊话语权——基于中国自主知识体系构建分析

The right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals on the new journey: Analysis based on the construction of China's independent knowledge system

摘 要
中国社会科学学术期刊话语权,是新征程上中国式现代化建设中国国家形象话语权的组成部分。党的十八大以来,话语权问题逐渐提上国家议事日程,显示出越来越重要的地位和作用。目前学术期刊话语权的实践和研究都存在一些偏向,需要从传播力、引导力、影响力三个方面进行深化。中国社会科学学术期刊话语权有其自身独特性,一是主体上的意识形态导向,二是传播上的渠道与文种特点,三是影响上的评价与对话特征,四是引导上的问题与方案特征,这些特征决定了中国社科学术期刊将具有主要以国内"内循环"为主、国际"外循环"为辅的"双循环"话语权特征。中国社会科学学术期刊的话语权现状,在传播方面是单刊传播力较弱而以数据库为主要模式,在引导力方面是国内引导力较强而国际引导力较弱,在影响力方面已经出现了一大批国内高影响因子社科学术期刊而国际影响因子较低。要提升中国社会科学学术期刊话语权,在传播力方面,一是不断优化数据库主渠道传播,二是做好做强融媒体社会面传播,三是探索深化集群化共同体传播;在引导力方面,一是通过议题设置以引导学术研究方向,二是通过规范设置以引导学术研究范式,三是通过话语设置以引导学术研究融合;在影响力方面,从质性角度看是评价、阅读首选项及口碑,从量性角度看是数据化的影响因子系列指标。中国社会科学学术期刊话语权建设,要在党的坚强领导下,以创造性转化和创新性发展的学术成果解决中国问题,回答时代之问,彰显中国之路,在中国社会科学学术"内循环"话语权的基础上,形成与中国综合国力和国际地位相匹配的学术"外循环"话语权。

词
关 键 词

社会科学学术期刊;  话语权;  学术期刊话语权; 传播力;  引导力;  影响力;  影响因子;  同行评议;  中国自主知识体系

Abstract

The right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals is an integral part of the right to speak in China’s national image in the new journey of Chinese-style modernization. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the issue of the right to speak has gradually been put on the national agenda, showing an increasingly important position and role. At present, there are some deviations in the practice and research of the discourse power of academic journals, which need to be deepened from the three aspects: communication, guidance and influence.The right to speak in Chinese academic journals of social sciences has its own uniqueness. The first is the ideological orientation on the main body,the second is the characteristics of channels and languages in communication, the third is the characteristics of evaluation and dialogue in influence, and the fourth is the characteristics of problems and plans in guidance. These characteristics determine the characteristics of the right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals, which will mainly focus on domestic "internal circulation" and supplemented by international "external circulation".The current situation of the right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals is that in terms of communication, the communication power of a single journal is weak and the database is the main model. In terms of guidance, the domestic guidance power is strong and the international guidance power is weak. In terms of influence, a large number of Chinese social science academic journals have emerged with high domestic impact factors and low international impact factors. To enhance the right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals, in terms of communication power,the first is to continuously optimize the main channel of database communication, the second is to do a good job in strengthening the social communication of integrated media, and the third is to explore and deepen the communication of clustered communities; In terms of guiding power, one is to guide the direction of academic research through topic setting, the second is to guide the academic research paradigm through normative setting, and the third is to guide the integration of academic research through discourse setting; In terms of influence, from a qualitative point of view, it is evaluation, reading preference and word of mouth, and from a quantitative point of view, it is a series of data-based impact factor indicators.under the strong leadership of the Party, the construction of the right to speak in Chinese social science academic journals should solve Chinese problems with academic achievements of creative transformation and innovative development, answer the questions of the times, highlight the Chinese road, and form an "external circulation" discourse power of international social science academia that matches China’s comprehensive national strength and international status on the basis of the "internal circulation" right to speak in Chinese social science academia.

ds
Key words

academic journals of social sciences;  right to speak;right to speak in academic journals;propagation force;  guiding force;  influence;  influence factors;  Peer review;  China's independent knowledge system

  
作者简介

韩云波，博士，西南大学中共党史党建研究院研究员，西南大学期刊社编审。

  
项目基金

国家社会科学基金项目“习近平总书记关于新时代党的组织路线重要论述及其实践路径研究”(22XDJ007)

  
引用本文

韩云波. 新征程上的中国社会科学学术期刊话语权——基于中国自主知识体系构建分析. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(6): 96-113. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.zs.2022.10.004.

以下两种方式均可获取原文

1. 扫二维码 | 获取全文

2. 点击文章底部阅读原文 | 获取全文

往期推荐

关于《重庆大学学报社会科学版》

国家新闻出版广电总局百强报刊

教育部名栏建设入选期刊

中文社会科学引文索引（CSSCI）来源期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊

中文核心期刊要目总览入编期刊

复印报刊资料重要转载来源期刊

中国科技核心期刊（社会科学卷）

投稿网址：

http://qks.cqu.edu.cn/cqdxskcn/author/login

联系电话：

023-65102306/65111861

扫码关注获取更多精彩