王 旭 | 多元融合视域下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究

学术期刊话语权专题

多元融合视域下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究

Research on the discourse power evaluation of Chinese academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion

摘 要
近年来,为改善学术生态环境,国家相关部门密集出台一系列关于学术期刊建设、学术评价、科研评价和人才评价等政策文件。开放科学发展战略和运行平台已在全球蓬勃兴起,科学交流模式与科学研究范式随之发生了变革和转型。开放科学环境下,学术期刊作为学术传播与交流的重要载体和学术共同体的重要组成部分,其在学科体系、学术体系和话语体系建设中发挥越来越重要的作用。中国学术期刊是解读中国实践,构建中国理论,助推中国学派,争夺并提升中国国际学术话语权的重要阵地。同时,开放科学环境下科学交流与研究范式的变革也急需多元开放的科学评价。中国学术期刊话语权评价研究为丰富和完善中国特色学术期刊话语权评价理论与指标体系,助推学术期刊建设和定量评价机制改革,助力提升中国学术期刊国际学术话语权提供参考。本文依据评价科学理论、话语权理论和传播学理论,在解析学术期刊话语权基本问题的前提下,融合多源异构数据,采用相关分析、集成因子分析、熵权法、TOPSIS法以及二维映射法优势,从多指标、多要素、多方法融合、比较和评估视角进行评价实证研究。本文致力于界定学术话语权和学术期刊话语权等概念内涵;提出由话语影响力和话语引导力维度构成的学术期刊话语权,话语影响力由话语影响能力和话语影响权力要素组成,话语引导力由新闻话语、社交媒体话语、同行评议话语、百科话语、视频话语以及政策话语引导等要素组成;探究学术期刊话语权形成过程;构建中国英文学术期刊话语权评价模型。研究表明,按照理论、方法与应用逻辑展开多元融合的学术期刊话语权评价研究具有一定的实用性、兼顾性和可靠性。中国学术期刊影响和引导学术研究的意识形态、学术术语和学术风向标,同时又极具中国风格、中国气派和中国特色。中国学术期刊理应作为学术话语的重要代言人,为加快"三大体系"建设,提升我国国际学术话语权贡献力量。

词
关 键 词

开放科学;  中国学术期刊;  学术期刊话语权;  学术期刊话体系;  话语权评价;  话语影响力;  话语引导力;  科学计量学;  Altmetrics

Abstract

To improve the current academic environment, in recent years, the Chinese authorities have issued a series of policy documents on academic journal construction, academic evaluation, scientific research evaluation and talent evaluation. Open science development strategies and operational platforms have flourished around the world, and scientific communication models and scientific research paradigms have undergone changes and transformations as a result. In the open science environment, academic journals, as important carriers of academic communication and an important part of academic communities, play an increasingly important role in the construction of disciplinary systems, academic systems and discourse systems. Chinese academic journals are an important position for interpreting Chinese practice, constructing Chinese theories, promoting Chinese schools of thought, and competing for and enhancing China’s international academic discourse. Meanwhile, in the open science environment, the transformation of scientific exchange and research paradigm urgently needs diversified and open scientific evaluation. This paper aims to enrich and improve the evaluation theory and index system of the discourse power of academic journals with Chinese characteristics, boost the construction of academic journals and the reform of quantitative evaluation mechanisms, and provide a reference for promoting the international discourse power of Chinese academic journals. Based on the theory of evaluation science, discourse power theory and communication theory, this paper discusses the basic issues of the discourse power evaluation of academic journals, integrates multi-source heterogeneous data, and adopts correlation analysis and integrated factor analysis, entropy weight method, TOPSIS method and two-dimensional mapping method to conduct empirical research from the perspectives of multi-factor, multi-indicator, multi-method fusion, comparison and evaluation.It defines the academic discourse power and the discourse power of academic journals. It is proposed that the discourse power of academic journals is composed of discourse influence and discourse leading. Discourse influence is composed of discourse influence ability and discourse power, and discourse leading is composed of news discourse, social media discourse, peer review discourse, encyclopedia discourse, video discourse and policy discourse leading. This paper explores the formation process of the discourse power of academic journals, constructs the discourse power evaluation model of Chinese academic journals in English. The results show that the research on discourse power evaluation of academic journals based on the theory, method and application logic is practical, comprehensive and reliable. Chinese academic journals influence and lead the ideology, academic terminology and academic vane of academic research, while being highly Chinese style, Chinese manner and Chinese characteristics. Chinese academic journals should serve as important spokespersons for Chinese academic discourse and contribute to accelerating the construction of the "three systems" and enhancing China’s international academic discourse.

ds
Key words

open science;  Chinese academic journals;  discourse power of academic journals;  system of academic journals;  discourse power evaluation;  discourse influence;  discourse leading;  scientometrics;  altmetrics

  
作者简介

王旭，博士，硕士研究生导师。

  
项目基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建中国话语权的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系研究”(18ZDA325)；河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“河北省高校学报影响力提升路径研究”(ZD202110)

  
引用本文

王旭. 多元融合视域下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(6): 114-131. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.pj.2022.09.001.

以下两种方式均可获取原文

1. 扫二维码 | 获取全文

2. 点击文章底部阅读原文 | 获取全文

往期推荐

关于《重庆大学学报社会科学版》

国家新闻出版广电总局百强报刊

教育部名栏建设入选期刊

中文社会科学引文索引（CSSCI）来源期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊

中文核心期刊要目总览入编期刊

复印报刊资料重要转载来源期刊

中国科技核心期刊（社会科学卷）

投稿网址：

http://qks.cqu.edu.cn/cqdxskcn/author/login

联系电话：

023-65102306/65111861

扫码关注获取更多精彩