查看原文
其他

NO On Prop 16的民意调查和捐款相关的答疑

CFER义工R & J realSVCA 2020-09-05




感谢大家参与survey并提供积极回馈,这篇帖子是关于捐款的详细解释,希望能打消大家的疑虑,有问题欢迎在公众号后台留言提问或进入微信群咨询。

本贴也在下方附上了整个survey的数据和总结供大家浏览。

CFER捐款链接 (政治捐款,仅限美国公民或者绿卡持有者,按法律规定需要填写雇主等信息):NoProp16.info或扫码进入捐款页面:

选战主要开销 选战主要开销包括: 付费人员, 律师费, yard sign, 宣传资料和广告。

CFER联盟主席Ward Connerly老先生已经公开讲了,目前的资金不足以买电视广告。social media和online广告都是至少需要两百万才会有影响选民的效果。我们现在距离最低广告的需要还差不少,筹款仍然是目前重中之重。

关于捐款的规定 - 依法必须是绿卡或公民。- 电话可填可不填。- 网上捐款最低25美元。- 依照法律,个人累计捐款总额$99及以下,CFER不上报雇主信息给FPPC,个人信息不公开。CFER 保留个人信息,以便计算累计捐款。- 可以用PayPal 捐款。但是因为微信屏蔽了Paypal,所以需要用browser (PC确定可以) 直接访问捐款网页。不能通过微信用Paypal捐款 。

注:FPPC 指的是 fair political practices commission,primarily responsible for the impartial and effective administration of the political reform act.

提供雇主信息是选举法的要求,确保雇主或者集团不能出资通过自己员工或者会员影响选举,同时用来确定选举资金来源是合法的。


公投捐款具体法律规定可参见:

https://www.svcaf.org/2020/07/ca-political-donations/


捐款用途明细

选举捐款是绿卡和公民的合法权利,有严格要求。资金的来源用途各种细节必须严格记录。在选战过程中,CFER不能完全将资金状况实时透明化,不能让对方知道选战细节。按照法律,选战资金来源和用途会在选战结束后全部公布。 


参见去年华州反I-1000资金来源及花费明细:

https://www.pdc.wa.gov/browse/campaign-explorer/committee?filer_id=LET%20PV%20008&election_year=2019    


当然最终是看民意,并不是谁钱更多就取胜。CFER官网最近补充了很多信息,希望有助大家更好了解prop 16。

https://californiansforequalrights.org/


想要了解最新捐款状况更新,请点击左下角"read more/阅读原文"

如果您有更多疑问,请加入我们答疑微信群,我们会详尽解答您的问题

Survey summary

-Ric Shar 8/25/2020 A survey was designed to understand why some Chinese Americans have not made donation to help fighting Prop 16. In 3 days, 392 responses were received. The detailed summary is as follows. Section 1: 我不想捐款的原因 (请选择最合适答案)(total 96 responses) 24.00% 有意愿捐款,可是对捐款资金如何使用, 我没有概念,没有信心 20.60% 有意愿捐款,可是不愿意暴露过多个人信息, 特别是雇主信息 19.80% 我支持 Prop 16 9.40% 有意愿捐款,可是对 CFER 团队以及志愿者信心不足 7.30% 有意愿捐款,可是不知道捐给哪个可靠的组织。 6.30% 犹豫捐款,我感觉我接受的信息不够,不能做决定. 4.20% 我对政治完全没兴趣, 我也不相信任何人和组织的宣传 3.10% Prop 16 通过是大概率事件,抗争也没用,还不如省钱省事,以后的事走一步看一步 3.10% 太忙, 没时间折腾这事 2.10% Prop 16 对我没有直接影响(我家孩子不上 UC, CSU,我家对政府合同,政府工作没兴趣). 至于间接影响,我懒得管了 0.00% 不在乎 UC 或其他加州公立大学在录取过程中严重族歧视华裔孩子 Conclusion for Section 1: Among people who have not made donation, 62% of them have intention to donate. 6.3% is still debating whether to donate. We still have room to work hard to win them over. However, the sample size (n=96) is small and may not be representative. To address many of those concerns, I have prepared a short FAQ and hope they are helpful. Mr. Huang C. prepares an even shorter version in Chinese. Section 2: I am strongly against Prop 16

There are 330 responses for this item. 79.1% of them have made donation while 20.9% claimed to make donations immediately. This survey helped to push folks who want to donate to take actions. 

Section 3: I have changed mind After adding an emotional narrative between a mom and kid, 27 folks changed mind in 12 hours. 

Unfortunately, this item was added into survey too late. It was not planned at the beginning

Section 4: About 12 folks have requested more information.



Modified on

    您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

    文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存