邓玉峰 | 我们到最后面对的只有伦理问题，活着只是一种选择
第一版海报被强行去掉敏感文字“34.6 万”和“武汉公民的”，最后只剩下“秘密”，100张海报也因此不能宣传。以后有关于《34.6万武汉公民的秘密》的展览内容将会涂改关键敏感词和相关主办单位与人员。
展 览 现 场
Exhibition Site
邓玉峰在中国黑市购买了三十几万武汉公民的隐私信息，用隐形药水打印在上万张A4纸上，将这些涂改过的私人信息纪念碑式的粘贴在美术馆，并组织上百名志愿者给这几十万中国公民发送邀请信息。这件作品只有在特殊的反隐形紫外线灯光照射下才能显现，日常光线下只是一张白纸。
开幕两天，展览被有关部门强制关闭，艺术家从美术馆带走调查，因各种压力，美术馆一夜之间紧急撤下有关《秘密》展览的一切信息。此次展览被中国和世界的各大媒体相继报道，引起了中国全民上下对公民个人权利保护与隐私的伦理边界话题讨论和抗议。媒体如下：纽约时报、美联社、CNBC、环球时报、法国国际邮报、荷兰电台、中央人民广播电台、参考消息、中国国际电视台、法制日报、经济观察报、中央社、武汉电视台、澎湃新闻、天津电视台、南方都市报、法律与生活、trend-watching英国全球趋势研究平台、TechNode、知乎热搜……
1号 2号 3号 4号
5号 6号 7号
邓玉峰每个月养着一个没有通讯录的手机号码，在各种软件和网站上登记，一年下来，手机里面积攒了各种黑色产业广告，内容有法lungong、妓女、办证刻章、发票、车牌、银行流水、文凭 、赌博 ... ...
同时也收到了很多人的回信：
“你有病”，“好”，“滚”......
来参观展览的一位阿姨选择了报警。
警察来美术馆立案调查取证与查封，并暂时没收了艺术家相关展览作品与私人电脑等物品，暂时限制艺术家不能离开武汉。
世界各大媒体报道与言论
Part ofmedia reports and comments worldwide
纽约时报国际版与纽约版
点 击 链 接 相 关 报 道
经济观察报：数据黑洞：你的“秘密”无所遁形
红星新闻：网购34.6万条个人信息做展览被关停 青年艺术家：希望看到的不止是违法
好奇心日报：有个艺术家在黑市购买了 34.6 万个人信息，在武汉做了场展览
楚天都市报：34.6万人信息被卖，可能有你的！电话住址车牌号都不值一提，最可怕的是…
南方都市报：他在黑市买了34.6万人的隐私办展览，触目惊心！网友吵疯
SIXTH TONE: Police Shut 'Privacy Art' Exhibit for Displaying Personal Data
CNBC、美联社、法国国际邮报、环球时报、中央人民广播电台、参考消息、中国国际电视台、法制日报、中央社、武汉电视台、澎湃新闻、天津电视台、法律与生活、trend-watching英国全球趋势研究平台、TechNode、知乎热搜 . . . . . .
《秘密》展览之后，有关于中国个人隐私的严重泄露以及隐私保护和数据监管机制的话题在中国不断被人们讨论与抗议。政府和很多商业机构也因此紧急加强和改变管理数据的监管机制。
2018年7月起至2019年12月底联合工信部、最高法、最高检、公安部、住建部、银保监会等十三个部门发布《综合整治骚扰电话专项行动方案》。
此次事件也引起了中国法律界有关如何追究艺术家的法律责任的争论，一方认为邓玉峰可能会面临7年以下有期徒刑，一方认为邓玉峰不能以刑事责任去处罚。艺术家至今仍在等待警方对此事件的最后定性和公布......
英 文 阅 读
The Secret of 346,000 Wuhan Citizens
The Public Art Projectof Wuhan Art Gallery , 2018
Criminal groups, privacy data,the masses, paper, invisible ink, uv lights, volunteer, video, printers, media, people, etc
ArtistDengYufeng bought the personal
data of346,000 Wuhan residents and the datawereprinted on A4 paper and
displayed onthe wall of the museum in amonumentalform, treated with a solution
that madethe data invisible indaylight butvisible in low light. Meanwhile
during theexhibition he launchedan art actionof inviting more than 100
volunteers to sendtext messages to thepeople whosedata has been bought and
exhibited, invitingthem to come to seetheirinformation.Two daysafter the
opening ceremony, theexhibition was shutdown by the localgovernment,Deng was
under investigation,themuseum removed alltraces of theexhibition “secretly”.The
incident has beenreported by variousmedia in Chinaand around the
world,including the New YorkTimes, the AssociatedPress, CNBC, GlobalTimes,
Courrier International, RadioNetherlands Worldwide,CNR, Reference News,CGTN,
Legal Daily, the EconomicObserver, CNA,Wuhan TV,thePaper,Tianjin Radioand TV
Station ,NanfangMetropolis Daily, Law and Life,Trend Watching,TechNode and
Zhihu...which hasled to discussions and protestson the ethicalboundary of
individual rightsprotection and privacy in China.
Thefirst version ofthe poster alerted the Chinese government since it wasreleased, and under thepolitical pressure, the sensitive words“346,000” and“Wuhan citizens”were removed, finally only the “secrets” was left.
The police came tothe Museum to investigate, collectevidence and close down the exhibition,temporarily confiscated Deng'sexhibition works, computers and other personalstuff,and restricted him fromleaving Wuhan. In the future,the exhibitions on"the Secrets of 346,000 Wuhan Citizens" willremove the keysensitive words,the relevant organizers and personnel.
After theexhibition,The topics on the severeleakage of personal privacy in China,privacyprotection and data supervisionmechanism have been constantly discussed andprotested by the people.Therefore,The government and many companies havestrengthened and changed theirsupervision mechanism of data management.FromJuly 2018 to the end of December2019,Thirteen departments, including theMinistry of Industry and InformationTechnology,the Supreme People’s Court,theSupreme People’s Procuratorate, the Ministryof Public Security,the Ministry ofHousing and Urban-Rural Development andChina Insurance Regulatory Commission,jointly issued the Special Action Planon Comprehensively Cracking DownHarassing Phone Calls and carry out thiscampaign across the country.Theincident has also sparked debates among Chineselegal experts, with one sidearguing that Deng could face up to seven years inprison and the other arguingthat he could not be punished with criminalresponsibility. Till now Deng isstill waiting for the final outcome from thepolice.
To be continued
其 它 艺 术 项 目 链 接