查看原文
其他

Journal of Financial Economics | 2016年第12期目录摘要

2016-12-21 陈沉 马焕超 会计学术联盟

青年会计学者联合发起的学术交流平台


分享信息,传正能量,交流学术

广结善缘,整合资源,服务成长




注:1、本文是平台常设的特色栏目—“文献速递”,推出的系列分享会计学术联盟微信公众号(KJXSLM)致力于做自己的原创品牌,做接地气的事儿,为海内外华人会计学者的成长服务。

Journal of Financial Economics

Volume 122, Issue3





1. Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts

Todd A. Gormley, David A. Matsa


2. Should we be afraid of the dark? Dark trading and market quality

Sean Foley, Tālis J. Putniņš


3. Failure to refinance

Benjamin J. Keys, Devin G. Pope, Jaren C. Pope


4. Say on pay laws, executive compensation, pay slice, and firm valuation around the world

Ricardo Correa, Ugur Lel


5. Cyclicality, performance measurement, and cash flow liquidity in private equity

David T. Robinson, Berk A. Sensoy


6. Short selling meets hedge fund 13F: An anatomy of informed demand

Yawen Jiao, Massimo Massa, Hong Zhang


7. Information tradeoffs in dynamic financial markets

Efstathios Avdis


8. Socially responsible firms

Allen Ferrell, Hao Liang, Luc Renneboog


9. Limited attention, marital events and hedge funds

Yan Lu, Sugata Ray, Melvyn Teo


10. Have financial markets become more informative?

Jennie Bai, Thomas Philippon, Alexi Savov






1. Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts

Todd A. Gormley, David A. Matsa

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):431-455

Abstract:This article examines managers’ incentive to play it safe. We find that, after managers are insulated by the adoption of an antitakeover law, they take value-destroying actions that reduce their firms’ stock volatility and risk of distress. To illustrate one such action, we show that managers undertake diversifying acquisitions that target firms likely to reduce risk, have negative announcement returns, and are concentrated among firms with managers who gain the most from reducing risk. Our findings suggest that instruments typically used to motivate managers, such as greater financial leverage and larger ownership stakes, exacerbate risk-related agency challenges.


2. Should we be afraid of the dark? Dark trading and market quality

Sean Foley, Tālis J. Putniņš

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):456-481

Abstract:We exploit a unique natural experiment—recent restrictions of dark trading in Canada and Australia—and proprietary trade-level data to analyze the effects of dark trading. Disaggregating two types of dark trading, we find that dark limit order markets are beneficial to market quality, reducing quoted, effective, and realized spreads and increasing informational efficiency. In contrast, we do not find consistent evidence that dark midpoint crossing systems significantly affect market quality. Our results support recent theory that dark limit order markets encourage aggressive competition in liquidity provision. We discuss implications for the regulation of dark trading and tick sizes.


3. Failure to refinance

Benjamin J. Keys, Devin G. Pope, Jaren C. Pope

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):482-499

Abstract:Households that fail to refinance their mortgage when interest rates decline lose out on substantial savings. Using a random sample of outstanding US mortgages in December 2010, we estimate that approximately 20% of unconstrained households for whom refinancing was optimal had not done so. The median household would save $160/month over the remaining life of the loan, for a total present-discounted value of forgone savings of $11,500, a particularly large consumer financial mistake. To shed light on possible mechanisms, we also provide results from a mail campaign targeted at a sample of homeowners who could benefit from refinancing.


4. Say on pay laws, executive compensation, pay slice, and firm valuation around the world

Ricardo Correa, Ugur Lel

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):500-520

Abstract:Using a large sample of firms from 38 countries over the 2001–2012 period, this study finds evidence that, following the adoption of say on pay (SoP) laws, chief executive officer (CEO) pay growth rates decline and the sensitivity of CEO pay to firm performance improves. These changes are concentrated in firms with high excess pay and shareholder dissent, long CEO tenure, and less independent boards. Further, the portion of top management pay captured by CEOs is lower in the post-SoP period, which is associated with higher firm valuations. Overall, these results suggest that SoP laws are associated with significant changes in CEO pay policies.


5. Cyclicality, performance measurement, and cash flow liquidity in private equity

David T. Robinson, Berk A. Sensoy

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):521-543

Abstract:We study the liquidity properties of private equity cash flows using data from 837 buyout and venture capital funds from 1984 to 2010. Most cash flow variation at a point in time is diversifiable — either idiosyncratic to a given fund or explained by the fund’s age. Both capital calls and distributions also have a procyclical systematic component. Distributions are more sensitive than calls, implying procyclical aggregate net cash flows. A consequence is that the well-known finding that funds raised in hot markets underperform in absolute terms is sharply attenuated when comparing to public equities. Consistent with a liquidity premium for calling capital in bad times, we find that funds with a relatively high propensity to do so perform better in both absolute and relative terms. Venture capital cash flows and performance are considerably more cyclical than buyout, and the links between cyclical cash flows and performance are likewise stronger.


6. Short selling meets hedge fund 13F: An anatomy of informed demand

Yawen Jiao, Massimo Massa, Hong Zhang

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):544-567

Abstract:The existing literature treats the short side (i.e., short selling) and the long side of hedge fund trading (i.e., fund holdings) independently. The two sides, however, complement each other: opposite changes in the two are likely to be driven by information, whereas simultaneous increases (decreases) of the two may be motivated by hedging (unwinding) considerations. We use this intuition to identify informed demand and document that it exhibits highly significant predictive power over returns (approximately 10% per year). We also find that informed demand forecasts future firm fundamentals, suggesting that hedge funds play an important role in information discovery.


7. Information tradeoffs in dynamic financial markets

Efstathios Avdis

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):568-584

Abstract:In dynamic financial markets the stochastic supply of risky assets has a significant informational role. Contrary to static models, where it acts as “noise,” in dynamic markets stochastic supply contains information about risk premiums. Acquiring private dividend information helps investors disentangle dividend information from discount-rate information contained in prices. For uninformed investors, however, as more informed investors enter the economy prices become more informative about dividends but less informative about discount rates. This tradeoff creates complementarities in information acquisition and multiple equilibria in the information market.


8. Socially responsible firms

Allen Ferrell, Hao Liang, Luc Renneboog

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):585-606

Abstract:In the corporate finance tradition, starting with Berle and Means (1932), corporations should generally be run to maximize shareholder value. The agency view of corporate social responsibility (CSR) considers CSR an agency problem and a waste of corporate resources. Given our identification strategy by means of an instrumental variable approach, we find that well-governed firms that suffer less from agency concerns (less cash abundance, positive pay-for-performance, small control wedge, strong minority protection) engage more in CSR. We also find that a positive relation exists between CSR and value and that CSR attenuates the negative relation between managerial entrenchment and value.


9. Limited attention, marital events and hedge funds

Yan Lu, Sugata Ray, Melvyn Teo

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):607-624

Abstract:We explore the impact of limited attention by analyzing the performance of hedge fund managers who are distracted by marital events. We find that marriages and divorces are associated with significantly lower fund alpha, during the six-month period surrounding and the two-year period after the event. Busy managers who manage multiple funds and who are not part of a team are more affected by marital transitions. Inattentive managers place fewer active bets relative to their style peers, load more on index stocks, exhibit higher R-squareds with respect to systematic factors, and are more prone to the disposition effect.


10. Have financial markets become more informative?

Jennie Bai, Thomas Philippon, Alexi Savov

Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 122(3):625-654

Abstract:The finance industry has grown, financial markets have become more liquid, information technology has been revolutionized. But have financial market prices become more informative? We derive a welfare-based measure of price informativeness: the predicted variation of future cash flows from current market prices. Since 1960, price informativeness has increased at longer horizons (three to five years). The increase is concentrated among firms with greater institutional ownership and share turnover, firms with options trading, and growth firms. Prices have also become a stronger predictor of investment, and investment a stronger predictor of cash flows. These findings suggest increased revelatory price efficiency.

 



其他刊文信息:



Accounting, Organization, and Society | 2016年第3期目录摘要

The Journal of Finance|2016年第11月目录摘要

Accounting, Organizations and Society|2016年第1期目录摘要

Accounting, Organizations and Society|2016年第2期目录摘要

Journal of Financial Economics|2016年第1期目录及摘要推送



公众号菜单栏目


【线上直播间 】学术大咖与联盟小伙伴对话

【线下研讨会 】不论资排辈,挖坑进行到底

【研究方法论 】论文研读,写作与投稿分享

【学术圈动态 】论文录用,课题中标新鲜事

【硕博 报考 】公布最新招生目录与导师介绍

【硕博 复试 】学长可知道你所不知道的秘密

【硕博 攻读 】过来人说,方法对,没那么难

【硕博 招聘 】推出最新的会计硕博招聘信息

【文献 速递 】传递国内外顶级期刊最新论文

【学术 会议 】分享国内外近期学术会议信息

【校际 联盟 】推送校际联盟成员的宣传稿件

【会员 之家 】发布会员活动信息,宣传会员


欢迎加入

全球最大会计博士QQ群(1793人):

群号:336218567


欢迎加入会计学术联盟QQ]硕士群

加群申请:称呼+专业+学历+单位
讨论考博、考研、找工作,情怀



欢迎关注“会计学术联盟”

助力个人学术成长


全球11400+会计硕博都在关注

会计学术领域NO.1自媒体


合作微信:13810834596

邮箱:Accounting_AU@yeah.net

网站:www.kjxslm.com

会议、招生、招聘,广告、合作

中会智库“精心打造”



本期小编:南开大学商学院 陈沉 博士

                   河北工业大学 马焕超

本期审核:北京物资学院  陈前前博士

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存