这届奥斯卡没乌龙！但这些昔日陪跑影片却狠狠diss了评委会一把...
雅思神级工厂，重塑英语思维
全球第一家雅思微课堂
5日第90届奥斯卡颁奖礼落下帷幕，
全程很稳，没有乌龙！
因为主办方真的很耿直，
专门在信封上用大字写清楚所颁发的奖项！
超大超清晰↓↓↓
再也不用担心尬颁了...
有人收割大奖，
也就有人落寞陪跑，
不过得不到的未必不好！
今天就给大家盘点
奥斯卡历史上一些惜败的好影片，
一些评论家还将其与获奖影片对比，
这波diss也是很服气了！
你怎么看呢？
SHOULD HAVE WON: "The Ten Commandments" (1956)
本该获奖：《十诫》（1956年）
Cecil B. DeMille’s final directing effortstill holds strong today. With its all-star cast, particularly the incredibleperformance by Charlton Heston as Moses (he didn’t even get an Oscar nominationfor the role), and its remarkable effects for that era, it’s a movie thatshould have been recognized with the top prize.
西尔.B.戴米尔导演的封山之作时至今日仍然影响深远。这部电影的全明星阵容，尤其是摩西扮演者查尔顿.赫斯顿出神入化的表演（他当年连奥斯卡提名都没得到），还有这部影片在当时引起的轰动效应，都是这部电影应该获得奥斯卡最高奖项的理由。
WINNER: "Around the World in 80 Days"
当年赢家：《环游世界八十天》
Based on the Jules Verne novel, this filmused all of Hollywood’s resources (a $6 million budget in the 1950s was farfrom cheap) to create a sprawling look at the world, but the story of asuper-rich English gentleman Phileas Fogg who attempts to win his wager tonavigate the globe is silly and far from memorable.
这部基于儒勒.凡尔纳小说的电影为了拍出环游世界的画面，动用了好莱坞的所有资源（耗资高达600万美元，在当时算是很高的），但是电影中讲述的超级富有的英国绅士斐利亚.福克为了打赌获胜而环游世界的故事却很傻而且没给人留下什么印象。
SHOULD HAVE WON: "RagingBull" (1980)
本该获奖：《愤怒的公牛》（1980年）
What might be Martin Scorsese’s masterpiece, this look inside the madness ofmiddleweight boxer Jake LaMotta had an incredible performance from Robert DeNiro. Beyond that, the cinematography, the deranged writing of Paul Schrader,and the editing of Thelma Schoonmaker (which marked the first time she andScorsese worked together; she’s done his films ever since) were so on the mark,it’s baffling how the Academy didn’t get it.
这部电影堪称马丁.斯科塞斯的杰作，影片窥探了中量级拳击手杰克.拉莫塔内心的疯狂，罗伯特.德尼罗的表演也十分出彩。除此以外，该片的摄影、保罗.施拉德的疯狂剧本、塞尔玛.斯昆梅克的剪辑（这是她和斯科塞斯首次合作，自那以后她就一直给他的电影做剪辑）都恰到好处，所以最终没能获评奥斯卡奖真是让人费解。
WINNER: "Ordinary People"
当年赢家：《普通人》
The late 1970s and early 1980s were whenthe melodrama was at its zenith in movie theaters, and "OrdinaryPeople" came around at the perfect time. The film didn’t just win bestpicture — it also achieved best director for Robert Redford and best actor forTimothy Hutton. Granted, the film has explosive performances in it, but thereneeds to be more than great acting to win best picture.
上世纪70年代末和80年代初正值情节剧电影的鼎盛时期，而《普通人》上映的正是时候。电影不光获得了奥斯卡最佳影片奖，还将最佳导演奖（罗伯特.雷德福）和最佳男演员奖（蒂莫西.哈顿）收入囊中。诚然，这部电影的表演是很有爆发力，但是出色的表演还不足以让这部电影获得奥斯卡最佳影片奖。
SHOULD HAVE WON: "L.A. Confidential" (1997)
本该获奖：《洛城机密》（1997年）
Curtis Hanson’s adaptation of JamesEllroy’s pulp novel of crooked cops in the City of Angels is one of the bestmodern-day noirs ever made. And with actors Kevin Spacey, Russell Crowe, andGuy Pearce owning their roles in an ensemble, the movie is a gripping dramawith a lot more suspense than "Titanic" had.
柯蒂斯.汉森的这部电影改编自詹姆斯.艾尔罗伊关于洛杉矶坏警察的低俗小说，是有史以来最出色的现代黑色电影之一。凯文.史派西、罗素.克劳和盖.皮尔斯对各自角色的演绎都很到位。相比《泰坦尼克号》，《洛城机密》的悬念更多，更扣人心弦。
WINNER: "Titanic"
当年赢家：《泰坦尼克号》
James Cameron’s love story on the doomedship was a box-office sensation that made Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winsletsuperstars. But a best picture winner? It’s one of the rare times that theAcademy went with what the mass audience liked, but we feel there was a more deservingwinner ...
詹姆斯.卡梅隆这部讲述沉船上的爱情故事的电影创下了票房奇迹，并让莱昂纳多.迪卡普里奥和凯特.温斯莱特成为了超级巨星。至于获得奥斯卡奖？这一次奥斯卡评委罕见地选择了大众喜欢的电影，然而更有资格获得奥斯卡奖的影片上面已经提过了。
SHOULD HAVE WON: "Goodfellas" (1990)
本该获奖：《好家伙》（1990年）
Scorsese was snubbed once more with"Goodfellas." One of his more popular films, this one was thought tobe what would finally get not just a best picture win for a Scorsese film but abest director honor for the legend. But it was Costner’s night.
斯科塞斯导演的作品再次受到了冷落。作为斯科塞斯比较受欢迎的电影之一，《好家伙》在当时被认为不仅会得到奥斯卡最佳影片奖，还会得到最佳导演奖。但这个奥斯卡之夜是属于凯文.科斯特纳的。
WINNER: "Dances with Wolves"
当年赢家：《与狼共舞》
Kevin Costner directs and stars in thislook at a soldier on a remote Western Civil War outpost who befriends NativeAmericans. Though it initially received positive reviews, many in the NativeAmerican community began highlighting its inaccuracies about their culture.Also, there’s one film that was up for the prize that many felt was moredeserving.
凯文.科斯特纳导演并主演的这部电影讲述了美国内战时期一名士兵在遥远的西部前线和美洲印第安人结下友情的故事。尽管这部影片一开始获得了正面的评价，但是原住民区的很多人指出这部影片关于印第安文化的描述不实。此外，许多人认为另一部电影更有资格获得奥斯卡奖。
SHOULD HAVE WON: "The Pianist" (2002)
本该获奖：《钢琴家》（2002年）
What should have won the prize was RomanPolanski’s unflinching look at a Jewish musician’s struggle to survive theWarsaw Ghetto in World War II. Polanski himself received an Oscar, as did leadactor Adrien Brody, but the voters went with something more upbeat than thismoving work in the final round.
本应获得奥斯卡奖的是罗门.波兰斯基导演的这部电影，该片赤裸裸地呈现了二战期间一名犹太音乐家在华沙犹太人区艰难存活的故事。波兰斯基和主演阿德里安.布劳迪都获得了奥斯卡奖，但是评委却在最后一个回合放弃了这部感人的电影，选择了另一部更欢乐的电影。
WINNER: "Chicago"
当年赢家：《芝加哥》
The movie musical suddenly became hot againin the early 2000s, with "Chicago" winning six Oscars, including bestpicture. But honestly, unless you happen to be obsessed with musicals, have youeven thought about this movie in the past decade?
本世纪初，音乐电影突然又火了起来，《芝加哥》一举斩获6个奥斯卡奖项，包括最佳影片奖。但是说实话，除非你正好对音乐剧特别痴迷，不然的话你过去十年可曾想起过这部电影？
SHOULD HAVE WON: "The Social Network" (2010)
本该获奖：《社交网络》（2010年）
In a perfect example of the age bias of theAcademy, more members could relate with a movie set in the late 1930s than withthe birth of Facebook. David Fincher’s dramatization of the rise of MarkZuckerberg is a movie looking at the now and most likely went over the heads ofthe older voters.
《社交网络》没有获评奥斯卡奖是评委年龄偏见的一个绝佳例子，比起脸谱网诞生的时代，以上世纪30年代末为背景拍摄的电影能让更多评委产生共鸣。大卫.芬奇这部讲述马克.扎克伯格崛起的电影关注的是当代，所以那些年长评委很可能根本就没有考虑这部影片。
WINNER: "The King’s Speech"
当年赢家：《国王的演讲》
Colin Firth (who won an Oscar for hisperformance) and Geoffrey Rush are great in the movie, but there really isn’tmuch else to go crazy about in this look at King George VI’s (Firth)public-speaking woes.
科林.菲尔斯（他凭借在此片中的表演获得奥斯卡奖）和杰弗里.拉什在电影中的表现都很出色，但是除此以外，这部关于乔治六世（科林.菲尔斯饰演）公共演讲苦恼的电影真没什么好看的。
看完上面的新老影单推荐，
你最喜欢哪部电影？
博昂思提分工厂
微信号:Bangs_Education
长按下方二维码，更可预约试听课程
更多惊喜等着你。快来关注我们吧~