查看原文
其他

论文快递:第一百三十三期

Urban Studies UrbanStudies 城市研究 2023-11-10
yi利物浦

编者按

Urban Studies 每年投稿量为1000多篇,每年发表16期,共180篇论文左右。由于稿件量大,文章从接收到正式出版周期较长,因此编辑部会在稿件接收排版后的第一时间在网上发布论文全文 (Online First) 。"论文快递" 栏目将同步推出网上刊登的最新论文,方便读者了解Urban Studies的最新动态,敬请关注!


本期为“论文快递”栏目的第一百三十三期,将介绍Urban Studies Oline First 的1篇论文以及Urban Studies Current Issue的4篇论文。主题包括跨国市政网络,动态集合住宅模型,爱彼迎与伦敦住房市场,非正规住房与环境设施,国际学校在中国的(去)领土化吸引力,欢迎阅读。

01

Institutionalising city networking: Discursive and rational choice institutional perspectives on membership of transnational municipal networks

城市网络的制度化:关于跨国市政网络成员资格的话语和理性选择的制度视角

Solveig Grønnestad(挪威斯塔万格大学)Anne Bach Nielsen(丹麦哥本哈根大学)首次出版时间:2021/12/28|研究论文
Abstract

This article analyses participants’ reasoning for their city’s membership in transnational municipal networks and the extent to which this changes over time. Theoretically, we build on new-institutional theory and conclude that although parts of the members’ reasoning have rational components, a discursive institutional perspective improves the understanding of cities’ membership of transnational municipal networks. This perspective uncovers how important aspects of transnational municipal network participation are motivated by a different logic than that of measurable output. Cities use transnational municipal networks as sources of internal and external legitimacy, to legitimatise their position in domestic politics and their international position among other ‘global’ cities.


摘要本文分析了参与者对其城市在跨国市政网络中的成员资格的论证,以及这种论证如何随时间而变化。从理论上而言,我们建立在新制度理论的基础上并得出结论认为,尽管成员的部分论证具有合理的成分,但论述制度论的视角能让我们更好地理解城市为何参与跨国市政网络。这个观点揭示了,在一些重要方面,城市参与跨国市政网络是由与可衡量输出不同的逻辑驱动的。城市利用跨国市政网络作为内部和外部合法性的来源,以使其在国内政治中的地位以及在其他“全球”城市中的国际地位合法化。
Keywords institutional theory, local government, networks, place branding, theory, transnational municipal networks
关键词制度理论, 地方政府, 网络, 地方品牌, 理论, 跨国市政网络
原文地址https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211061450

02

On the long-run solution to aggregate housing systems

集合住房系统的长期解决方案

Geoffrey Meen(英国雷丁大学)Alexander Mihailov(英国雷丁大学)Yehui Wang(山东财经大学)首次出版时间:2021/1/24|研究论文
Abstract

This paper explores the properties of dynamic aggregate housing models. In conventional models, in response to demand shocks the primary adjustment mechanism is through prices and changes in housing supply. However, the size of the supply response depends on the price elasticity of supply and in countries such as the UK where the elasticity is low, house prices can rise sharply, worsening affordability. But this ignores the roles of housing risk and credit markets which affect the user cost of capital and the paper demonstrates that models that explicitly introduce a housing risk premium have an additional price stabiliser. The importance is shown through stochastic simulations; these simulations also demonstrate that conventional models used for forecasting and policy analysis may overstate future house price growth.


摘要 

本文探讨动态集合住宅模型的特征。在传统模型中,为了应对需求冲击,主要的调整机制是通过价格和住房供应的变化。然而,供应反应的规模取决于供应的价格弹性,在英国等弹性较低的国家,房价可能会大幅上涨从而降低可负担性。但这忽略了住房风险和信贷市场的作用,它们影响资本的使用成本,本文证明,明确引入住房风险溢价的模型具有额外的价格稳定因素。重要性通过随机模拟显示;这些模拟还表明,用于预测和政策分析的传统模型可能高估了未来的房价增长。


Keywords economic processes, finance, housing, affordability, housing risk
关键词 经济过程, 金融, 住房, 可负担性, 住房风险
原文地址 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020976019

03

Airbnb and its potential impact on the London housing market

爱彼迎及其对伦敦住房市场的潜在影响

Zahratu Shabrina(英国伦敦大学学院)Elsa Arcaute(英国伦敦大学学院)Michael Batty(英国伦敦大学学院)首次出版时间:2021/1/16|研究论文
Abstract

This article identifies proxies which account for the impacts that the Airbnb platform is having on housing in Greater London. We identify these by analysing the relationships between possible Airbnb misuse and the attributes of housing in the same locations. We assume misuse when listings of entire properties within the Airbnb platform do not conform with local regulations and where hosts who offer such housing have multiple listings. In particular, we examine (1) the dwelling type based on building typology; (2) the type of housing tenure, whether it is owned or rented; and (3) the spatial distribution of changes in rent payable. Three important findings emerge from our analysis. First, based on 2018 data, we estimate that more than 2% of all properties in London, and up to 7% in some local areas are being misused through Airbnb as short-term holiday rentals. Second, the location of these particular Airbnb rentals is negatively correlated with the diversity of dwelling types and positively correlated with dwelling type such as an apartment (or flat) in areas of high private rental stock. Last, we show that a 100% increase in the density of possible Airbnb misuse can be associated with up to an 8% increase in unit rental price per-bedroom per-week, an equivalent to up to an average of £90 price increase per year. Finally, we discuss how this type of analysis can help build instruments to inform policies associated with the platform economy in relation to increasing polarisation in the London housing market.


摘要 本文识别了一些指标,这些指标说明了爱彼迎 (Airbnb) 平台对大伦敦住房市场的影响。我们通过分析同一地段可能的爱彼迎误用与住房市场特征之间的关系来识别这些指标。当爱彼迎平台内的整体房产放租信息不符合当地法规,并且放租者有多个放租信息时,我们推定存在误用。具体而言,我们研究(1)住宅的建筑类型学分类;(2)住房使用权的类型,是自有的还是租赁的;(3)应付租金变化的空间分布。我们的分析得出了三个重要发现。首先,根据2018年的数据,我们估计伦敦超过2%的房产和一些分区高达7%的房产作为短期度假出租物业而发生了爱彼迎误用。第二,这些特定爱彼迎出租物业的位置与住宅类型的多样性负相关,与住宅类型(例如私人出租房屋存量高的地区的公寓)正相关。最后,我们表明可能的爱彼迎误用的密度增加100%可能会导致每间卧室每周的单位租赁价格增加8%,相当于每年平均增加90英镑。最后,我们讨论这种类型的分析如何有助于建立一些工具,面对伦敦住房市场日益严重的两极分化,这些工具能为与平台经济相关的政策的制定提供参考。
Keywords Airbnb misuse, dwelling types, entropy statistics, London housing market, rental values
关键词 
爱彼迎误用, 住宅类型, 熵统计, 伦敦住房市场, 租赁价值

原文地址 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020970865

04

The effects of land price in the peri-urban fringe of Mexico City: Environmental amenities for informal land parcel purchasers

墨西哥城城郊边缘土地价格的影响:非正规地块购买者的环境设施

Estebania Teyeliz Martínez-Jiménez(墨西哥国立自治大学)Julie Le Gallo(法国第戎农学研究所)Enrique Pérez-Campuzano(墨西哥国立自治大学)等四位作者首次出版时间:2020/11/6|评论论文

Abstract

In many developing countries, urban growth is characterised by the emergence of informal housing at the periphery. Nevertheless, there is little evidence based on data from informal land markets and, in general, studies focusing on such markets often neglect environmental factors. Therefore, to contribute to these research gaps, this article aims to enhance our understanding of land markets in informal land parcels and their relationship to environmental amenities, by providing empirical evidence from Mexico City. The article estimates a hedonic pricing model using robust ordinary least squares with a SHAC (Spatial Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent) inference, including structural, environmental, neighbourhood and accessibility features. Results provide empirical insights regarding the way this land market behaves in the peri-urban area. Our findings reveal that informal land parcel purchasers are willing to pay for basic services such as access to piped water, proximity to schools and accessibility features such as being close to city centre, motorways and underground stations. Although a positive relationship between land price and distance to the nearest forest or Protected Natural Area is highlighted, it is low, meaning that individuals are largely ambivalent about environmental amenities. Therefore, the problem of irregular settlements could be approached from two different angles. Firstly, informal land buyers will not desist from invading and modifying natural areas without a comprehensive urban and environmental policy, oriented towards changing the perception of green areas as potential urbanisation opportunities. Secondly, public policy needs to solve the housing supply crisis, considering the characteristics presented here.



摘要在许多发展中国家,城市增长的特点是城市周边出现了非正规住房。然而,基于非正规土地市场数据的证据很少,总体而言,关注此类市场的研究往往忽视环境因素。为了填补这些研究空白,本文旨在通过提供来自墨西哥城的经验证据,增强我们对非正规地块土地市场及其与环境设施的关系的理解。本文使用稳健的普通最小二乘法来估计享乐定价模型,并得出了一个SHAC(空间异方差性和自相关一致性)推断,其中涵盖结构、环境、邻里和可达性特征。研究结果提供了关于城市周边地区土地市场行为方式的经验见解。我们的调查结果显示,非正规的地块购买者愿意为基本服务付费,如通水、靠近学校和无障碍设施(如靠近市中心、高速公路和地铁站)。虽然研究结果显示了地价和与最近的森林或自然保护区的距离之间的正相关关系,但这种相关性很低,这意味着个人一般对环境设施抱有矛盾心理。因此,不正规住区的问题可以从两个不同的角度来看待。首先,在没有全面的城市和环境政策(这些政策旨在纠正人们把绿地当做潜在城市化开发机会的错误看法)的情况下,非正规土地购买者不会停止入侵和改造自然区域。其次,考虑到研究呈现的特点,公共政策需要解决住房供应危机。
Keywordsagglomeration/urbanisation, environment, environment/sustainability, hedonic model, housing, informality, land use
关键词

集聚/城市化, 环境, 环境/可持续性, 享乐模型, 住房, 非正规性, 土地使用


原文地址https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020960968

05

The (de)territorialised appeal of international schools in China: Forging brands, boundaries and inter-belonging in segregated urban space

国际学校在中国的(去)地域化吸引力:在隔离的城市空间中打造品牌、边界和相互归属

Lily Kong(新加坡管理大学)Orlando Woods(新加坡管理大学)Hong Zhu(广州大学)首次出版时间:2020/9/19|评论论文
Abstract

This paper considers how the (de)territorialised appeal of international schools in China can reflect, enforce and expand pre-existing patterns of urban segregation. Whilst exploration of the effects of educational marketplaces on urban environments has become a focus of scholarly research, the recent expansion in the supply of, and demand for, international education has caused these effects to become more nuanced. As (de)territorialised entities, international schools can cause multiple forms of spatial and psycho-social distinction and (dis)association to become intertwined, the effects of which start from the school and radiate out from there. International schools can therefore cause segregation to become a structurally entrenched phenomenon. These ideas are illustrated through an empirical examination of three international schools located in the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou. We explore the ways in which these schools are branded spaces that reproduce socio-spatial boundaries and thus foster a (de)territorialised sense of inter-belonging amongst their students.


摘要
本文探讨了国际学校在中国的(去)领土化吸引力如何反映、强化和扩展原有的城市隔离模式。虽然探索教育市场对城市环境的影响已经成为学术研究的焦点,但最近国际教育供求的扩大导致这些影响变得更加微妙。作为(去)领土化实体,国际学校可能导致多种形式的空间和心理-社会区隔和联合/割裂交织在一起,其影响从学校开始扩散开来。因此,国际学校可能导致隔离成为一种结构性的、根深蒂固的现象。这些观点通过对位于中国东部城市苏州的三所国际学校的实证研究得到了印证。我们研究这些学校如何成为再现社会空间边界的品牌空间,从而培养学生中间的一种(去)领土化的相互归属感。
Keywords(de)territorialisation, China, inter-belonging, international schools, segregated urban space
关键词领土化, 中国, 相互归属, 国际学校, 隔离的城市空间
原文地址https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020954143

扫码关注我们

微信号|USJ_online

Urban Studies期刊官方微信公众号


继续滑动看下一个

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存