查看原文
其他

啥?美国人奋起保卫言论自由啦!160位美学者教授联名呼吁

在路上 CAAOC一SNNnews 2020-09-05

点上蓝字关注SNN美国

新闻相约南加尔湾


SNN:7月7日 美国知名杂志Harpers发表160多位美国作家学者教授记者等知识分子的联名信,核心内容就是:请给我们言论自由,别搞一言堂啦。背景是BLM种族抗议活动下,美国任何不同声音会遭到大量攻击,连UC伯克利教授只敢用匿名信表达不同意见,纽约时报编辑发表不同意见文章遭解雇,主流媒体更是选择性失声。相关:UCLA教授被请愿辞退之后  斯坦福大学等5所大学又来

图源自BBC历史资料

01

编辑发表有争议文章被解雇;

书籍因所谓不实信息遭撤回;

记者被禁止发表某些话题;

教授因课堂上引用作品被调查

这还是那个自我标榜的美国吗?


一封呼吁正义和公平辩论的公开信

2020年7月7日



我们的文化机构正面临审判的时刻。强力的种族和社会正义抗议活动,带来对警察系统改革的更多要求,以及对整个社会更大程度的平等和包容的广泛呼吁,这些呼声尤其出现在高等教育,新闻业,慈善事业和艺术领域。

但是,这类重要的行动也同时加剧了一套新的道德标准和政治承诺的出现,这些倾向和态度在削弱我们对公开辩论和对分歧的容忍尺度,表现为要求意识形态的统一整合。

当我们为前者的现象喝彩时,我们也同时反对第二种情况的发展。反自由主义的力量在全世界范围内不断增强,并在川普(Donald Trump)集团中拥有强大的盟友,这对民主构成了真正的威胁。但是,决不能允许抵抗力量把教条或强制性变成自己的品牌——而右翼煽动者已经在利用这些。我们必须通过反对任何一方出现的不宽容的现象,才能维护民主的包容。

信息和思想的自由交换,本是自由社会的命脉,而现在每天都变得越来越受限。虽然我们早已知道极端的权利喜欢这些,但在我们的文化中,审查做派也越来越广泛地传播起来:不宽容反对的声音,将公开羞辱和排斥作为一种新时尚,以及试图用盲目的道德确定性去解决复杂的政策问题。

我们曾经坚持维护来自各个角度的声音,包括那些大声的甚至是苛刻的反对。但是现在,那些呼吁针对不同言语和思想做出迅速而严厉的报复的声音,开始变得很普遍。更令人不安的是,一些机构的领导们,以弥补损害为出发,采取草率而过度的方式施行惩罚,而不是进行深思熟虑的改革。

编辑因发表有争议的文章而被解雇书籍因所谓的不真实信息而遭到撤回记者禁止发表某些话题;教授因为课堂上引用某些文学作品而被调查;研究员因传播一个被同行评审的学术研究而被解雇;组织负责人因偶然的笨拙错误而被赶下台。

无论围绕每个特定事件的争论如何,其结果都是进一步缩小言论自由的范围,且不用担心被惩罚的后果。我们已经为规避风险付出了更多的代价,在作家、艺术家和新闻记者圈子里,他们担心如果自己偏离共识,甚至如果没有对共识表现出来足够的热情,就无法维持生计。

这种令人窒息的气氛,最终将损害我们这个时代最重要的东西。无论是专制政府还是不宽容的社会,限制辩论总是首先会伤害到那些缺乏权力的人,并使每个人都减少民主参与的能动性。挫败坏主意的方法是通过曝光,争论和说服,而不是通过沉默或希望他们消失。我们拒绝在正义与自由之间进行任何错误的选择,而这些离不开彼此。

作为作家,我们需要一种文化,让我们有进行实践、冒险甚至犯错误的空间。我们需要保留真诚分歧的可能性,且不会由此产生影响工作的严重后果。如果我们不捍卫我们的职业所依赖的这种生命线,那么我们就不要指望公众或国家替我们去捍卫。

(联署发表此封信件的知识分子包括,哈利波特的作者JK Rowling,知名学者福山,美欧多所知名高校如哈佛 普林斯顿 耶鲁等大学知名教授等,一起超过一百六十人。完整名单参考下面清单:中文来自 在路上)


图源自杂志网站
02

美国教授作家记者等

160多名知识分子联名

还能让我们有不同意见吗 

原文:


Our cultural institutions are facing a moment of trial. Powerful protests for racial and social justice are leading to overdue demands for police reform, along with wider calls for greater equality and inclusion across our society, not least in higher education, journalism, philanthropy, and the arts. 

But this needed reckoning has also intensified a new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity. 

As we applaud the first development, we also raise our voices against the second. The forces of illiberalism are gaining strength throughout the world and have a powerful ally in Donald Trump, who represents a real threat to democracy. But resistance must not be allowed to harden into its own brand of dogma or coercion—which right-wing demagogues are already exploiting. The democratic inclusion we want can be achieved only if we speak out against the intolerant climate that has set in on all sides.

The free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society, is daily becoming more constricted. While we have come to expect this on the radical right, censoriousness is also spreading more widely in our culture: an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty. 

We uphold the value of robust and even caustic counter-speech from all quarters. But it is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought. More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panicked damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms. 

Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study; and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes. 

Whatever the arguments around each particular incident, the result has been to steadily narrow the boundaries of what can be said without the threat of reprisal. We are already paying the price in greater risk aversion among writers, artists, and journalists who fear for their livelihoods if they depart from the consensus, or even lack sufficient zeal in agreement.

This stifling atmosphere will ultimately harm the most vital causes of our time. The restriction of debate, whether by a repressive government or an intolerant society, invariably hurts those who lack power and makes everyone less capable of democratic participation. The way to defeat bad ideas is by exposure, argument, and persuasion, not by trying to silence or wish them away. We refuse any false choice between justice and freedom, which cannot exist without each other. 

As writers we need a culture that leaves us room for experimentation, risk taking, and even mistakes. We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences. If we won’t defend the very thing on which our work depends, we shouldn’t expect the public or the state to defend it for us.

Elliot Ackerman
Saladin Ambar, Rutgers University
Martin Amis
Anne Applebaum
Marie Arana, author
Margaret Atwood
John Banville
Mia Bay, historian
Louis Begley, writer
Roger Berkowitz, Bard College
Paul Berman, writer
Sheri Berman, Barnard College
Reginald Dwayne Betts, poet
Neil Blair, agent
David W. Blight, Yale University
Jennifer Finney Boylan, author
David Bromwich
David Brooks, columnist
Ian Buruma, Bard College
Lea Carpenter
Noam Chomsky, MIT (emeritus)
Nicholas A. Christakis, Yale University
Roger Cohen, writer
Ambassador Frances D. Cook, ret.
Drucilla Cornell, Founder, uBuntu Project
Kamel Daoud
Meghan Daum, writer
Gerald Early, Washington University-St. Louis
Jeffrey Eugenides, writer
Dexter Filkins
Federico Finchelstein, The New School
Caitlin Flanagan
Richard T. Ford, Stanford Law School
Kmele Foster
David Frum, journalist
Francis Fukuyama, Stanford University
Atul Gawande, Harvard University
Todd Gitlin, Columbia University
Kim Ghattas
Malcolm Gladwell
Michelle Goldberg, columnist
Rebecca Goldstein, writer
Anthony Grafton, Princeton University
David Greenberg, Rutgers University
Linda Greenhouse
Rinne B. Groff, playwright
Sarah Haider, activist
Jonathan Haidt, NYU-Stern
Roya Hakakian, writer
Shadi Hamid, Brookings Institution
Jeet Heer, The Nation
Katie Herzog, podcast host
Susannah Heschel, Dartmouth College
Adam Hochschild, author
Arlie Russell Hochschild, author
Eva Hoffman, writer
Coleman Hughes, writer/Manhattan Institute
Hussein Ibish, Arab Gulf States Institute
Michael Ignatieff
Zaid Jilani, journalist
Bill T. Jones, New York Live Arts
Wendy Kaminer, writer
Matthew Karp, Princeton University
Garry Kasparov, Renew Democracy Initiative
Daniel Kehlmann, writer
Randall Kennedy
Khaled Khalifa, writer
Parag Khanna, author
Laura Kipnis, Northwestern University
Frances Kissling, Center for Health, Ethics, Social Policy
Enrique Krauze, historian
Anthony Kronman, Yale University
Joy Ladin, Yeshiva University
Nicholas Lemann, Columbia University
Mark Lilla, Columbia University
Susie Linfield, New York University
Damon Linker, writer
Dahlia Lithwick, Slate
Steven Lukes, New York University
John R. MacArthur, publisher, writer

Susan Madrak, writer

Phoebe Maltz Bovy, writer
Greil Marcus
Wynton Marsalis, Jazz at Lincoln Center
Kati Marton, author
Debra Mashek, scholar
Deirdre McCloskey, University of Illinois at Chicago
John McWhorter, Columbia University
Uday Mehta, City University of New York
Andrew Moravcsik, Princeton University
Yascha Mounk, Persuasion
Samuel Moyn, Yale University
Meera Nanda, writer and teacher
Cary Nelson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Olivia Nuzzi, New York Magazine
Mark Oppenheimer, Yale University
Dael Orlandersmith, writer/performer
George Packer
Nell Irvin Painter, Princeton University (emerita)
Greg Pardlo, Rutgers University – Camden
Orlando Patterson, Harvard University
Steven Pinker, Harvard University
Letty Cottin Pogrebin
Katha Pollitt, writer
Claire Bond Potter, The New School
Taufiq Rahim
Zia Haider Rahman, writer
Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen, University of Wisconsin
Jonathan Rauch, Brookings Institution/The Atlantic
Neil Roberts, political theorist
Melvin Rogers, Brown University
Kat Rosenfield, writer
Loretta J. Ross, Smith College
J.K. Rowling
Salman Rushdie, New York University
Karim Sadjadpour, Carnegie Endowment
Daryl Michael Scott, Howard University
Diana Senechal, teacher and writer
Jennifer Senior, columnist
Judith Shulevitz, writer
Jesse Singal, journalist
Anne-Marie Slaughter
Andrew Solomon, writer
Deborah Solomon, critic and biographer
Allison Stanger, Middlebury College
Paul Starr, American Prospect/Princeton University
Wendell Steavenson, writer
Gloria Steinem, writer and activist
Nadine Strossen, New York Law School
Ronald S. Sullivan Jr., Harvard Law School
Kian Tajbakhsh, Columbia University
Zephyr Teachout, Fordham University
Cynthia Tucker, University of South Alabama
Adaner Usmani, Harvard University
Chloe Valdary
Helen Vendler, Harvard University
Judy B. Walzer
Michael Walzer
Eric K. Washington, historian
Caroline Weber, historian
Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers
Bari Weiss
Sean Wilentz, Princeton University
Garry Wills
Thomas Chatterton Williams, writer
Robert F. Worth, journalist and author
Molly Worthen, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matthew Yglesias
Emily Yoffe, journalist
Cathy Young, journalist
Fareed Zakaria

阅读原文链接-https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/



一位耶鲁学生一场成功营销100桶媒体汽油

 少年:祝贺让BLM黑人运动成为笑话

终于 我看到了美国黑人中的老人

真正的加州平权组织CFER浮出水面 

反ACA5美民权领袖81岁披挂再上阵

为什么阻击ACA5 十个理由甩给他们



END


扫码帮你入SNN教育和时事群



扫上码留言X学院也行



A  X学院公益课启动

 招募X同学X老师

B   X学院公益课堂 

面向3-8年级学生

尔湾高中生授课

网页小程序编程公益课报名

C  X学院定制课堂  

面向1-3年级学生

大语文定制团购课报名

扫上码留言:公益课or定制课


SNN南加自动新闻 扫码

学生新闻机器人SNNnewsus.com

家长中文社区SNNnewsus.com/d




部分文字图片来自网络,版权归原作者.有问题请联系 谢谢!



妈妈说:好东西要分享给朋友哦

有感觉的文章,只要三步:谢谢!

1.分享在朋友圈

2.点赞+在看

3.留个言让思想留下来闪亮

 戳鼓励


    您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

    文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存