WeChat ID APAPA-OHIO About Feature 通过教育、参与和领导能力的培养，加强亚太裔美国人对政治和公共事务的影响。 2019年10月1日，联邦法官伯劳斯（Allison D. Burroughs）在反平权组织“学生支持公平入学”（SFFA）对哈佛大学提出的诉讼案中裁定，支持哈佛基于种族考虑的入学政策。 “哈佛的多样性在一定程度上取决于考虑种族因素的入学政策。哈佛大学的录取计划满足了严格的法律标准，符合宪法之要求。”伯劳斯在裁决书中写道。 SFFA于2014年对哈佛提出诉讼，称该校的考虑种族的入学政策歧视亚裔美国人。在诉讼过程中，哈佛的秘密招生政策的一些细节浮出了水面。 该案于2018年10月开始审理。在该诉讼案交由伯劳斯处理之前，哈佛大学和SFFA对该校的招生政策进行了三周的辩论。专家们最初预测她将在今年夏天公布裁决。 伯劳斯在裁决书中写道，哈佛的政策符合最高法院关于可接受的平权入学政策的先例。 她写道：“法庭认为，哈佛已经证明其录取程序符合最高法院在费希尔第二判例（Fisher II*）中阐明的原则。” SFFA主席布卢姆（Edward Blum）在一份新闻稿中说，他的组织计划将这一裁决上诉至第一巡回上诉法院。 “学生支持公平入学组织对法院维持哈佛的歧视性入学政策感到失望。我们相信，在审判中提交的文件、电子邮件、数据分析和SFFA的陈述有力地揭示了哈佛对亚裔申请人的系统歧视。” 深红报尚未联系到哈佛官方对此置评。 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_v._University_of_Texas_(2016) （中文编译：殷余民） 英文原文：Harvard Crimson BREAKING: Federal Judge Rules Harvard's Admissions Policies Do Not Discriminate Against Asian-American Applicants Federal Judge Allison D. Burroughs ruled Tuesday to uphold Harvard’s race-conscious admissions policies in the lawsuit filed against the University by anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions. “Ensuring diversity at Harvard relies, in part, on race conscious admissions. Harvard’s admission program passes constitutional muster in that it satisfies the dictates of strict scrutiny,” Burroughs wrote in her decision. SFFA filed the lawsuit against Harvard in 2014, alleging that the College's race-conscious admissions policies discriminates against Asian-American applicants. Over the course of the lawsuit, details about Harvard’s notoriously secretive admissions policies have emerged. The case went to trial in October 2018. Harvard and SFFA sparred over the College’s admissions policies for three weeks before the decision was left at the hands of Burroughs. Experts intially predicted she would issue her ruling over the summer. In her ruling, Burroughs wrote that Harvard’s policies meet the Supreme Court’s precedent for acceptable affirmative action admission policies. “Ultimately, the Court finds that Harvard has met its burden of showing that its admissions process complies with the principles articulated by the Supreme Court in Fisher II,” she wrote. Edward Blum, the president of SFFA, said in a press release that his organization plans to appeal the ruling to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. “Students for Fair Admissions is disappointed that the court has upheld Harvard’s discriminatory admissions policies. We believe that the documents, emails, data analysis and depositions SFFA presented at trial compellingly revealed Harvard’s systematic discrimination against Asian-American applicants,” he said. Harvard officials could not immediately be reached for comment. —This is a developing story. Check thecrimson.com for updates. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2019/10/2/admissions-suit-decision/ 【编者按】本文仅代表作者观点，不代表APAPA Ohio及OCAA官方立场。所有图片均由作者提供或来自网络。如存在版权问题，请与我们联系。更多精彩文章，请查看我们公众号的主页。欢迎大家积极投稿！ 【近期文章】 生命最后时刻，美国修车人才知道世界首富是自己的儿子 反S386法案进入“深水区”，请把握好方向 美国华人为什么在职场会输给印度人？ 美国移民律师界“教父”撰文反对HR1044/S386绿卡改革 2019美国公民领袖论坛成功召开 HR1044/S386法案背后，是华人微弱的参政力量 美国华人为什么反对S386法案？该如何操作？ 什么样的学生受名校青睐？哈佛2023届新生背景调查 一道加了排华调料的大菜 传奇华人罗杰刘：从中学肄业生到名震美国政坛的“扫地僧” 关于俄州亚太联盟公众号 俄州亚太联盟公众号是APAPA Ohio在俄亥俄华人协会(OCAA)的支持下办的公众号，旨在为俄亥俄的亚裔群体、尤其是华人群体提供一个分享、交流、互助的平台，宣传APAPA Ohio 、OCAA和其他亚裔团体的活动，促进亚裔社区对美国社会、政治、文化、教育、法律等的了解。APAPA的全名是Asian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs Association (美国亚太联盟)，是在美国联邦政府注册的501(c)(3)非营利组织。网址：APAPA.org 我们的宗旨：通过教育、参与和领导能力的培养，加强亚太裔美国人对政治和公共事务的影响。我们的公众号将继续围绕这个宗旨，记录我们的社区活动，刊登社区关心的教育、文化、艺术、体育、时事和政论文章。请大家长按下面的二维码关注、支持我们，谢谢！ Go to "Discover" > "Top Stories" > "Wow" Posted Sending Comment Scan with WeChat tofollow the Official Account