【EOS Gov】Thomas:EOS.IO宪法草案第四条——不买卖选票
版权声明：
以下内容来自微信公共帐号“EOS技术爱好者”，搜索“EOSTechLover”即可订阅，译者Lochaiching。转载必须保留以上声明。仅授权原文转载。
本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/646/article-iv-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-no-buying-or-selling-of-votes/，Thomas Cox在EOS GO中更新了宪法草案第四条的内容，由本号“EOS技术爱好者”翻译。
本文为中英文对照版本内容，第一部分内容为宪法草案第四条的正文，第二部分为lan的评论。
Article IV - v0.3.0 Draft EOS.IO Constitution - No Buying or Selling of Votes
第四条 ：0.3.0版本EOS.IO宪法草案 - 不买卖选票
Thomas Cox
Purpose
As previously discussed in the Design Principles of this Draft, the EOSIO Software will provide a mechanism for Token Holders electing Block Producers. Voting will be by weight of staked tokens as detailed elsewhere.
目的
正如之前的设计原则草案（https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/424/design-principles-of-my-v0-1-draft-eos-io-constitution）中所讨论的那样，EOSIO软件将为代币持有者选出区块生产商提供一种机制。投票将按照其他详细说明（本文不赘述）那样来按质押代币的权重计算。
Text of Article
No Member shall accept anything of value in exchange for a vote of any type, including Block Producer candidates or Worker Proposals. Penalties for violation may include, but are not limited to, fines, account freezing, and reversal of transactions.
本文内容
任何成员都不能接受任何有价值的东西来交换任何类型的选票，包括区块生产者候选人或工作者建议（译者注：Worker，可以理解为一同维护链上生产及相关机能的非BP工作者）。违规处罚可能包括但不限于罚款、账户冻结和撤销交易。
Discussion
Votes represent a public good. When a token holder takes the time to become informed and cast a wise vote, the whole chain benefits from this effort.
This topic has been discussed extensively, for example here and here.
讨论
选票代表公共利益。当代币持有者真正花时间去了解情况并明智地投票时，整条链也将会因此受益。
这个话题已经被广泛讨论过了，例如在这里（https://medium.com/@thomas.cox_39839/whither-the-6-month-vote-lockup-f683d31d8de2）和这里（https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/353/why-paying-for-votes-is-bad）。
References
none yet
参考链接
还没有
(all opinions are my own)
（所有的观点都代表我自己）
Comments
评论部分
SunTzuPosts: 19 Jr. Member -
April 18
As we know from the politics, the ability to interfere with voting is a dark art. Simple vote buying is just the start. Votes can be interfered with, deflected, blocked in any number of ways.
E.g., if I put up a website with lots of hard core stats on BPs and "cast your vote here" which I redirect to my BP, I have not exchanged nor bribed.
If I write a virus that slides through idle machines looking for keys and votes them my way, no money has changed hands.
If I DDOS the primary voting site for one BP while my BP slides in, I've not bought off the voters.
What I have done is breached the independence of the voters. For that reason I'd say we need to set the principle of independence in voting, and raise a high standard against that. So that whenever we find any evidence that interferes with the independence of any voting, we can pursue it.
Something like:
The voting of BPs must be conducted independently.
And then wait for the evidence.
正如我们从政界得知的那样，干涉投票是一门黑暗的艺术。简单的买选票只是开始。选票在很多方面可以被干扰、被导向、被阻止。
例如，如果我在BP上建立了一个有很多核心统计数据的网站，并且设置“在这里投下你的选票”，我就会把他们导向到支持我这个BP，我并没有交换，也没有贿赂。
如果我写了一种病毒，通过闲置的机器来寻找突破口并按我的方式投票，也没有钱转过手。
如果我用DDOS攻击BP的主要投票网站插入我这个BP介绍的幻灯片，我也没有收买选民。
我所做的一切都违背了选民的独立性。因此，我认为我们需要在投票中确立独立原则，并用高标准来拥护它。所以只要我们发现任何干扰投票独立性的证据，我们都要追究。
就像是:
BP的投票必须独立进行。
然后等待证据。
本文内容不代表本号任何立场
本文图片来源于网络
本文原文链接为https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/646/article-iv-v0-3-0-draft-eos-io-constitution-no-buying-or-selling-of-votes/，作者Thomas Cox，译者Lochaiching。转载请参照本文文首说明。
更多内容，关注“EOS技术爱好者”
要是这篇文章对你有用，扫描下面erc-20地址给我们赞赏吧 !