In any discussion of the 2020 election, it is critical to remove the word "stolen." Why? Because the election was only "stolen" if a specific amount of fraud resulted in a specific number of fraudulent ballots in a specific number of states.
If the actual, legal balloting would have resulted in a certain result, and the fraud added X number of Biden votes and subtracted Y number of Trump votes, but not enough to result in Biden "winning", we should be equally exercised at there being fraud, whether or not it was enough to swing the election. That it may have happened to be enough to swing it, is actually less important than the fact that there was fraud.
I don't know about any of my colleagues here, but I watched 40 hours of testimony, about eight hours each in five states (PA, WI, GA, MI and AZ) in December and January after the election. The venues were public hearings of committees of the state's Legislatures. The witnesses each had about 5-10 minutes to speak, so there were a lot of them. They were not sworn for the spoken testimony, but provided their testimony separately as sworn documents subject to perjury; many simply read their already-sworn testimony.
It was awful. The witnesses were primarily election workers and poll-watchers, and most of the testimony related to gross mishandling of ballots, re-processing of already-counted ballots, mail-in ballots in stacks, all somehow without the creases a mail-in ballot would have, and all having only the presidential race voted, machine-filled-in ballots, the strange shutting down of counting in those states (but counting proceeded without oversight) ... you get the idea.
If any court in the country actually allowed this testimony it would have blown up the election. The fact that NO court would grant standing, for evidence to be heard, leaves a lot of us with grave concern as to whether the 2022 election will have any of that fixed, let alone 2024. If it was gotten away with once, after all, well, you get the idea.
Was it enough to "steal" the election? It certainly could have been. But it happened, and will happen again. The left is using the strawman of whether the election was "stolen" to deflect from the real issue -- the massive fraud that did take place.
A replay can only be prevented at the state level. Either the legislatures take over, as the Constitution actually addresses, or the cities will continue to fraud their brains out.
Supplementary Discussion：
At the same time those five states were holding hearings -- they were the ones with the strange suspensions of counting in the middle of the nights -- many people were trying to get a court to hear actual evidence. Not a single court would grant "standing" (the right to bring legal action) to any entity, so none of the evidence, including the testimony of all those people, ever was heard by a judge, anywhere.
Clearly the left did some very strange things to try to fix the election, and they may have been successful; the idea that Joe Biden got 81 million votes while essentially staying in his basement and not campaigning is ludicrous. But the election and the fraud needed to come before a court, and it never got to happen.