Response Letter写法(三)：分享一些常见语句
前言：
前期的分享中主要强调了一些回答问题的格式与基本原则，今天再具体分享一些可能会用到的回复意见的回答语句，希望对大家有所帮助，也欢迎大家指正。
1. 审稿人对语言不满意怎么办？The paper is poorly written, the use of English need to be improved all over the manuscript.
个人意见：回复简单一点没有关系，重点是让审稿人看到你确实对论文的语言做出了相应的修改，下面是一些实例：
A: We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
B：Thanks for your suggestion. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.
C. Thanks for your suggestion. We have tried our best to polish the language in the revised manuscript.
2. 单词拼写错了怎么办？On page X, line Y, "XXX" should be "YYY".
A：We sincerely thank the reviewer for careful reading. As suggested by the reviewer, we have corrected the “___” into “___”.
B. We feel sorry for our carelessness. In our resubmitted manuscript, the typo is revised. Thanks for your correction.
C. We have carefully checked the manuscript and corrected the errors accordingly.
3. 审稿人让加文献怎么办？Ref. 14, e.g., is certainly not the only paper on XXX but there is tons of papers on this very subject! Please check the literature!
A：We sincerely appreciate the valuable comments. We have checked the literatures carefully and added more references on ___ and___ into the INTRODUCTION part in the revised manuscript.
On XXX，Chen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 2, 34-56; Li et al., Science. 2011, 2, 34-56;
On YYY, Chen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 2, 34-56; Li et al., Science. 2011, 2, 34-56;
B. As suggested by the reviewer, we have added more references to support this idea (Chen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 2, 34-56; Li et al., Science. 2011, 2, 34-56). According to Chen et al., ___ is ...
4. 审稿人让补实验怎么办？It would be nice to see what happens to the catalytic system after the first run.
A. 如果能补：
We have investigated the recyclable property for ___ by using ___ that have the best activity. Figure 1 reveals only slight decrease in the ___ after the three-run test, indicating very good stability of ___ in photocatalytic reactions.The manuscript has been revised accordingly to clarify the above concerns.
B. 如果补的实验没有得到预期的结果（一般应该找文献来支撑相应结果）：
As suggested by the referee, we have tried our best to verify XXX by____. However, no ___ signal has been detected in our synthesis system. Other researchers also found that it is very difficult to obtain a well-resolved hyperfine structure for ___. As suggested in the literatures, ____; Some researchers even think that it is impossible to obtain a well-resolved hyperfine structure by ___.
C. 如果实验条件或者客观条件不允许(上次已更新)：
We agree that more study would be useful to understand details of interaction and enhancement. At this point we do not have the necessary tool-set to study the ___. We hope, in the future, to employ ___ techniques to determine ___. This study is beyond the scope of this report which focuses on answering critical questions regarding the ___. We note also that since submission of our manuscript there has been apublication by Alex Bell and Martin Head-Gordon at Berkeley showing that Fe on Au2O3 has enhanced OER activity with DFT calculations (Ref. 79). We have added this citation and reference to the manuscript.
5. 一些体现对审稿人表示尊敬的套话总结（部分内容来源于网络）：
A. general response：
示例1：We sincerely thank the editor and all reviewers for their valuable feedback that we have used to improvethe quality of our manuscript. The reviewer comments are laid out below in italicized font and specific concernshave been numbered. Our response is given in normal font and changes/additionsto the manuscript are given in blue text.
类似的：On behalf of all the contributing authors, I would like to express our sincere appreciations of your letter and reviewers’ constructive comments concerning our article entitled “XXX文章” (Manuscript No.:XXXX). These comments are all valuable and helpful for improving our article. According to the associate editor and reviewers’ comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing. In this revised version, changes to ourmanuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text. Point-by-point responses to the nice associate editor and two nice reviewers are listed below this letter.
B. We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft, the detailed corrections are listed below.
C. According to the reviewer’s comments, we have revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. We hope that our manuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you very much for your help.
D. Thank you again for your positive comments and valuable suggestions toimprove the quality of our manuscript.
E. We were really sorry for our careless mistakes. Thank you for your reminding.
F. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. Thank you very much for your help.