GCB | 土壤微生物碳泵:从概念认识到实证评估
文献信息:
Zhu Xuefeng, Jackson Randall D, DeLucia Evan H, Tiedje James M, Liang Chao*. The soil microbial carbon pump: from conceptual insights to empirical assessments. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(11): 6032-6039. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15319
Figure 1 Brief illustration of soil organic carbon (C) formation paradigms that demonstrate microbial activity to “process” C, in which the evolved understanding highlights microbial ability to produce long‐lasting compounds that accumulate in soil. Arrows represent fluxes among pools. Traditional knowledge of soil C formation focused on partial degradation of plant detritus by microbial catabolism (black lines), as shown in the left‐hand panel. However, there is mounting evidence that microbial anabolism (red lines) also plays an important role—microorganisms can directly transform C into persistent forms via necromass depositions, as shown in the right‐hand panel. The thickness of the arrow representing pathways may vary depending on the ecosystems
Figure 2 Illustration of the changes in microbial necromass carbon (C) and soil organic carbon (SOC). Changes to 100 cm depth under restored perennial grassland communities sown with two levels of plant species richness at the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST), where the “additional SOC” pool under high diversity prairie was comprised of ~92% microbial necromass C (a); after 6 years of alternative bioenergy cropping systems in the University of Illinois Energy Farm (UIEF), where the “additional SOC” pool under swichgrass was comprised of ~76% microbial necromass C and under mixed prairie was ~93% (b)
Figure 3 Relative changes in amino sugars (AS) and soil organic carbon (SOC). Relative changes in AS and SOC to 100 cm depth under restored perennial grassland communities sown with two levels of plant species richness at the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST; a), and alternative bioenergy cropping systems in the University of Illinois Energy Farm (UIEF) after 6 years (b), where the WICST calculates the relative changes between diversity treatments and the UIEF calculates the relative changes between years within each cropping system (see Supplementary File S3 for specific calculations). In (a), HD and LD mean high and low diversity plantings, respectively. In (b), MMS means maize–maize–soybean rotation