查看原文
其他

重点关注丨12月17日雅思阅读/听力考情回顾与备考建议!

2016-12-20 新东方南京学校IELTS中心


12月17日听力

一、考试概述:

本场考试题型配置中规中矩,20个选择类题目,20个填空类题目。2015年-2016年常规的题型包括:笔记、表格、单选、配对、地图基本等都已经出齐。并且在题目场景方面有三个section与雅思真题中的题目在题型配置和内容方面有极高的相似度。相信这一场题型常规、场景对于认真刷题的同学来说很熟悉的考试,应该可以算是对2016年雅思考试的一个总结。

 

Section 1 银行保险——保险索赔  10笔记

Section 2 相互介绍——接人  4单选+6地图搭配

Section 3 学生讨论——艺术学校选课场景  5单选+5配对

Section 4 历史——事件测量的历史  10笔记

 

二、具体题目分析:

Section 1

新旧情况:09147

场景: 银行保险——保险索赔

题型:10笔记

 

参考答案:

1. phone number : (答案待补充)

2. Address: (答案待补充)

3. date of shipping arrival: 27th February

4. lost 10 paintings

5. mirror in a golden frame

6. a whole box of books

7. a/an old table/desk

8. a Chinese gift of a plate

9. desk and chairs: the leg is broken

10. total value to be claimed is : $ 3450

(答案仅供参考)


备考建议:

本场S1的10个个人信息表题,内容方面和剑8的一套题目有极高的相似度。刷过题的同学相信应该游刃有余。个别词汇如February, mirror拼写上如果出现问题实属不该,最后一题的数字考点也是在学习过程中反复强调的,虽然这次的金钱考到了四位数,但是写出来并不难,也不易混淆。

参考练习:C8T2S1


Section 2

新旧情况:11104

场景:相互介绍——接人

题型:4单选+6地图搭配

11-14)

11. What did T say not to take the Super Shuttle bus

A. it only access to certain hotels

B. it takes longer time

C. it does not have regular depart time

 

12. What does T say about the Shuttle bus?

A. it is not convenient to get to the station

B. it does not i service during night

C. no suitable bus stop

 

13. third kind of bus: about the airport Station Monorails

A. sign in the stop

B. get off at the third stop

 

14. what did T tell Jane about the ticket?

A. she needs to buy two tickets

B. check the ticket during the journey

C. she can use the ticket for both leave and return

 

15-20)配对地图

15. Linkin Avenue -B

16. Hall - C

17. Taxi Rank - E

18. Bus Stop - I

19. Cafe - D

20. Restaurant - G

(答案仅供参考)

备考建议:

本次考试又出现了难度相对来说比较大的地图搭配题,虽然有指引方位的图例,但是考生很可能因为大量的街道和地点名词出现,从而在听题过程中错失答案句位置。所以审题时就要熟记这些地点名词,并在听题过程中跟紧文本内容,不要走神,用这些已知地点名词去定位。

参考练习:C8T4S2

Section 3

新旧情况:07307

场景:学生——艺术学校选课场景

题型:5选择+5配对

参考答案:

21. Why did James Choose to study in the Baker?

A. it is located near his home

B. good reputation in his subject area

 

22. What he found in his study?

B. surprised that he can finish the theoretical courses

 

23. What about the assessment of James course?

A. done by himself

B. marks given by students with each other

C. marked by teachers' comment

 

24. The girl enquire the English language course for what?

A. make an artist living

B. selling art pieces in a galleries

C. to have a future career as artist

 

25. before she go to this collage, to get more information about?

A. date of the course

B. scholarships

C. choice of modules

 

26-30) matching

A. A lot of back ground reading

B. Stay at the Studio long

C. Many outside speakers

D. the most difficult course

E. Student do their own research

F. focus on display

G. using materials

   

26. history of art- C

27. sculpture option -G

28. painting digital - B

29. Theory of Art - E

30. Photograph - F

备考建议:

本场考试S3内容和剑10T3的戏剧课程和未来发展讨论内容、题型高度重合。单选题和搭配题结合起来也增加了整个section的难度。

参考练习:C10T3S3

Section 4

版本号:10154

场景:历史——事件测量的历史

题型:10笔记

参考答案:

31-40)笔记题

Primitive measurements by observing

Two time keepers : 31. the sun's position

Tell cycles or migration of 32. animal's behaviour

33. years later, precise measurement became important for organising activities for religions

34. connected with government

35. the earliest ancient time keepers were discovered in Mesopotamia and North Africa

(答案仅供参考)

备考建议:

本题是笔记填空题与表格类填空题混合而成的题型。并且出现了religions,temperature和duration这样的长难词以及Sandglasses这样的专有名词,整体难度是相对来说比较大的。建议考生在复习时注意积累这样的长难词和场景词汇,同时在平时练习过程中要掌握根据发音规则拼写单词的能力。

参考练习:C6T2S4

12月17日阅读


一、考试概述:

本次考试的文章是两篇旧文章,一篇新文章,难度中等。第一篇讲了某位学者发现的顺势治疗法,第二篇讲了环境对孩子的影响,第三篇讲了棱皮龟。


二、具体题目分析

Passage 1:

题目:Overdosing on nothing

题号:旧题

文章大意:某位学者发现的顺势治疗法,直到现在都还很流行。讲了这种疗法的发展,以及它在英国和欧洲带来的影响。

 

Overdosing on nothing

A

An international protest this week aims to demonstrate the truth about homeopathy-that there’s literally nothing in it, says Martin Robbins AT 10.23am on 30 January, more than 300 activists in the UK, Canada, Australia and the US will take part in a mass homeopathic “overdose”. Skeptics will publicly swallow an entire bottle of homeopathic pills to demonstrate to the public that homeopathic remedies, the product of a scientifically unfounded 18th-centuryritual, are simply sugar pills. Many of the skeptics will swallow 84 pills of arsenicum album, a homeopathic remedy based on arsenic which is used to treat a range of symptoms, including food poisoning and insomnia. The aim of the “10:23” campaign, led by the Merseyside Skeptics Society, based in Liverpool, UK, is to raise public awareness of just exactly what homeopathy is, and to put pressure on the UK’s leading pharmacist, Boots, to remove theremedies from sale. The campaign is called 10:23in honor of the Avogadroconstant (approximately 6 x 1023, the number of atoms or molecules in onemole of a substance), of which more later.

B

That such a protest is even necessary in 2010 is remarkable, but somehow the homeopathic industry has not only survived into the 21st century, but prospered. In the UK alone more than £40 million is spent annually on homeopathic treatments, with £4 million of this being sucked from the National Health Service budget. Yet the basis for homeopathy defies the laws of physics, and high-quality clinical trials have never been able to demonstrate that it works beyond the placebo effect.

C

The discipline is based on three “laws”; the law of similars, the law of infinite simals and the law of succession. The law of similars states that something which causes your symptoms will cure your symptoms, so that, for example, as caffeine keeps you awake, it can also be a cure for insomnia. Of course, that makes little sense, since drinking caffeine, well, keeps you awake. Next is the law of infinitesimals, which claims that diluting a substance makes it more potent. Homeopaths start by diluting one volume of their remedy arsenic oxide, in the case of arsenicumalbum-in 99 volumes of distilled water oralcohol to create a “centesimal”. They then dilute one volume of the centesimal in 99volumes of water or alcohol, and so on, up to 30 times. Application of Avogadro’s constant tells you that a dose of such a“30C” recipe is vanishingly unlikely to

contain even a single molecule of the active ingredient. The third pillar of homeopathy is the law of succession. This states-and I’m not making this up-that by tapping the liquid in a special way during the dilution process, a memory of the active ingredient is somehow imprinted on it. This explains how water is able to carry a memory of arsenic oxide, but apparently not of the contents of your local sewer network.

D

The final preparation is generally dropped onto a sugar pill which the patient swallows. Homeopaths claim that the application of these three laws results in a remedy that, even though it contains not a single molecule of the original T-T-J.— ingredient, somehow carries an “energy signature” of it that nobody can measure or detect. Unsurprisingly, when tested under rigorous scientific conditions, in randomized, controlled and double blind trials, homeopathic remedies have shown to be no better than a placebo. Of course, the placebo effect is quite powerful, but it’s a bit like justifying building a car without any wheels on the basis that you can still enjoy the comfy leather seats and play with the gear shift.

E

Even some retailers who sell the treatments have admitted there is no evidence that they work. In November, Paul Bennett, the super intendent pharmacist at Boots, appeared before the UK parliament’s Commons Science and Technology Committee’s “evidence check” on homeopathy. He was questioned by Member of Parliament Phil Willis, who asked: “Do they work beyond the placebo effect?” I have no evidence before me to suggest that they are efficacious,” Bennett replied. He defended Boots’s decision to sell homeopathic remedies on the grounds of consumer choice. “A large number of our consumers actually do believe they are efficacious, but they are licensed medicinal products and, therefore, we believe it is right to make the mavailable,” he said.

F

You might agree. You might also argue that homeopathy is harmless: if people want to part with their money for sugar pills and nobody is breaking the law, why not let them? To some extent that’s true-there’s only so much damage you can do with sugar pills short of feeding them to a diabetic or dropping a large crate of them on someone’s head. However, we believe there is a risk in perpetuating the notion that homeopathy is equivalent to modern medicine. People

may delay seeking appropriate treatment for themselves or their children.

G

We accept that we are unlikely to convince the true believers. Homeopathy has many ways to sidestep awkward questions, such as rejecting the validity of randomized controlled trials, or claiming that homeopathic remedies only work if you have symptoms of the malady they purport to cure. Our aim is to reach out to the general public with our simple message: “There is nothing in it”. Boots and other retailers are perfectly entitled to continue selling homeopathic remedies if they so wish and consumers are perfectly entitled to keep on buying them. But hopefully the 10:23 campaign will ram home our message to the public. In the 21st century, with decades of progress behind us, it is surreal that governments are prepared to spend millions of tax pounds on homeopathy. There really is nothing in it.

 

Passage 2:

题目:The Impact of Environment to Children

题型:判断+填空+主旨

题目:新题

 

Questions 14-18

Complete the table now. Choose No More Than Three Words from the Reading Passage for each answer.

Type of Impact to ChildrenRange of Reference to SiblingsRate of Influence

14 background from parents and familyIncluding to all of siblings40%-50%

Shared Environment to 15 less than 16

17 to part of siblings 18 -50%

Questions 19-21

Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using No More Than Three Words from the Reading Passage for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 19-21 on your answer sheet.

Research in recent years illuminated that the impact from parents will frequently be 19 by the peers pressure. It was also indicated that 20 of knowledge that children learned from other culture is increasing. Study has found quantities of competing 21 between parents and children or even between parents themselves.

Questions 22-25

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage?

In boxes 22-25 on your answer sheet, write

YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer

NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer

NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

22. The more children there are in a family, the more impacts of environment it is.

23. Methods based on twin studies still meet unexpected differences that can not be ascribed to be purely genetic explanation.

24. Children prefer to speak the language from the children of the same age to the language spoken by their parents.

25. The Study of non-shared environment influence can be a generally agreed idea among researchers in the field.

 

参考答案:

14.genetic

15. all of siblings

16. 10%

17. Non-shared environment

18. 40%

19. interrupted

20. variations

21. interests

22. NG

23. Y

24. NG

25. N

26. B

(答案仅供参考)

备考建议:可以用C7T2R2来练习,该篇题目同样为判断+填空+段落匹配(主旨题)。

 

Passage 3:

题名:A Warm-Blooded Turtle

题型:匹配+摘要+判断

文章大意:说的是一种海中的鱼。一开始先讲了说发现乌龟的尸体,然后说人们开始研究为什么这种不属于这里的乌龟会死在海滩上。然后就说这种乌龟很难研究,因为它整天在水底,而且游得比较深,只有等母乌龟生蛋的时候它才会上岸。好多的方法都勇于保护乌龟。

备考建议:可以用C4T1R1来练习,题型与该篇一致。

推荐阅读

预立废退!记雅思项目组秋季第十二次教研

简单粗暴!原价1500元的雅思全真模考限时免费送!

重要!12月3日雅思阅读/听力考情回顾与备考建议!

南理工留学讲座丨雅思明星教师讲解留学规划

新东方雅思点题班口语话题妥妥命中,你还不来?



南京出国交流QQ群汇总>>>

南京中学生留学家长群 111204577

南京中学留学家长2群 564118435

南京大学生留学公益群 399342761

托福备考群 328900909

雅思备考群 546314913

ACT答疑群 244508043

AP备考群 547160919

GRE、GMAT备考群 547206181




您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存