胡鑫宇事件新闻发布会:那只高举的手

美国梭哈,日荷跟进,中国芯片奋力一搏还是盖牌走人?

百思不得其解,为什么要让胡鑫宇的家属签保密承诺书?

龙多坛城投放仪轨之《大自在祈祷文——大加持云》

母子乱伦:和儿子做了,我该怎么办?

生成图片,分享到微信朋友圈

自由微信安卓APP发布,立即下载! | 提交文章网址
查看原文

纪念罗尔斯逝世20周年丨如何研读文本

Let me say that in looking at a text of this sort, which is so large, and with so many elements in it, if you are to get as much out of it as you can, you must try to interpret it in the best and most interesting way. There is no point in trying to defeat it, or to show the author was wrong in some way, or that his argument doesn’t follow. The thing is to make as much out of it as you can and to try to get a sense of how the overall view might go, if you put it in the best way. Otherwise, I think it is a waste of time to read it, or to read any of the important philosophers.


John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed.Samuel Freeman (MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), pp.52.

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存