查看原文
其他

《Plant direct》| wiley又添一植物新期刊!!

2017-10-24 PaperRSS PaperRSS




欢迎点击「PaperRss」↑关注我们!


今天早上起床,刷微信朋友圈,发现一位来自海归(现某高校教授)朋友发布了一个推送《plant direct是今年由wiley出版集团联合aspb和seb共同打造的一份新的开源杂志。创刊以来一直在关注,前几期稿源很少,第四期有增加文章的质量不好不差,估计自身定位是从aspb的pc,pp和seb的pj捡漏。对文章研究内容不讲究novelty和impact,接受negative result和重复性实验结果。》,突然意识到,Plant direct是继plant physiology、plant cell、plant journal 又一新创刊植物杂志,以后植物研究发表又多添一渠道。 当然,新鲜出炉,暂时没有影响因子的,但地位绝对是和3P同一档次的。以下是搜集到的一些关于《plant direct》的介绍


1  Plant direct 在ASPB,wiley 正式亮相






2 《plant direct》开源期刊,免费下载




 Plant Direct (plantdirectjournal.org), a new journal from Wiley and the societies behind Plant Physiology, The Plant Journal, and The Plant Cell. Although there is a crowded landscape of journals to choose from, we believe that Plant Direct fills an unserved role for the plant community. We seek to be the sound science plant journal for the community of ASPB members, Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) members, and the authors who publish in our society journals. By “sound science,” Plantdirect 主编在介绍 plant direct植物期刊说道。该杂志有以下几个亮点值得推崇!



1 strong promotion of preprint posting at submission (预印本发布)


2 referred reviews from Plant Physiology, The Plant Cell, and The Plant Journal—that is, manuscripts will be easily transferred for consideration along with any accompanying reviewer reports; 


3 publication of anonymous reviewer reports upon acceptance.



从上述特点可以看出,Plant direct 提交预印本可以加快出版过程通过减少或消除步骤导致延误,其次,允许编辑受益于先前的评论和可以完全消除需要发送稿件审查,从而期刊Reviewer工作量,此外同行评论的公开发表,将确保文章审查的流程的完整性和透明度。


3 《plant direct》第一期文章对自己的介绍


    

    Plant Direct is now fully up and running and accepting manuscripts and publishing papers. We are very excited to see the great science that has been submitted. But many have asked me what our statement "We seek to be the sound science plant journal for the community of ASPB members, SEB members, and the authors who publish in our society journals" indicates about our scope—in terms of both subjects and types of papers. In this editorial, I will attempt to answer those questions in some detail.

    We are hoping to fill a niche for the entire plant science community—a place for everyone to publish all of their sound science. The inaugural Editorial for Plant Direct provides more details about our mission as a community journal. The scope of Plant Direct includes all of the original research that you might submit to Plant Physiology, The Plant Cell, or The Plant Journal—we simply apply different review criteria and make judgments on sound science rather than impact or novelty. In addition, we are also interested in the following types of research:

    Negative results: Do you have a research project that, while well executed, did not produce a significant result around which to frame your manuscript? For example, did you identify a set of genes—a gene family, candidates from quantitative genetics or transcript profiling experiments, and screen mutants of the genes for a given phenotype—but none were different from wild type? Those results still have value to our community, and we would be happy to publish them. You just have to convince your reviewers that you conducted the experiments rigorously and to the technical standards of the community.

Replication Experiments: Have you intentionally, or unintentionally, repeated an experiment that other researchers have already published? Just like with negative results, knowing that these results are or are not replicable has value to the community.

    Methods, software tools, and datasets: These represent incredibly important components of any research project, and many times it can be useful to publish them quickly as a discreet, citable unit. Plant Direct is happy to provide a venue for our community to rapidly disseminate these contributions.

    Functionally, the subject matter scope is defined by the members of our editorial board: An editor has to make an affirmative decision to handle a manuscript, so they need to feel that its subject matter is close enough to their expertise for them to evaluate. The effective scope will expand as our board grows. To give you a feel for the current board, our editors selected keywords representing their expertise. You can find a full listing of the keywords and associated editors here, and the figures represent the breadth of the terms they used. However, authors should not consider these lists to strictly define our scope; we are happy to consider manuscripts on subjects related to our expertise—for example, work on plant species that are not listed.

    I hope that this editorial has answered your questions about whether Plant Direct is the right place for your next manuscript. But if you still have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at PlantDirect@wiley.com.



欢迎点击「PaperRss」↑关注我们!


资料来源:https://blog.aspb.org/2017/03/14/introducing-plant-direct/


Introducing Plant Direct

March 14, 2017 

As the editor-in-chief, I am excited to introduce Plant Direct (plantdirectjournal.org), a new journal from Wiley and the societies behind Plant Physiology, The Plant Journal, and The Plant Cell. Although there is a crowded landscape of journals to choose from, we believe that Plant Direct fills an unserved role for the plant community. We seek to be the sound science plant journal for the community of ASPB members, Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) members, and the authors who publish in our society journals. By “sound science,” we mean that instead of trying to determine the novelty or impact of a paper, we will judge manuscripts based on whether the experiments and analysis are performed to an acceptable technical standard and described in adequate detail in standard English, how well the conclusions are supported by the data, and whether the manuscript and contents meet all ethical and research integrity standards (as the person who will have to deal with it if it occurs, can we please not violate the last one, pretty please?).

Plant Direct is a society journal, and we think the service-to-community part of our mission statement is incredibly important. Publishing has changed dramatically over the past two decades, and many of the services that journals have provided are no longer essential. The single most important service that journals provide now is managing the peer review process. But the effort of peer review at a sound science journal is done entirely by the community; active scientists are both the editors and reviewers (helped out by the great management staff at Wiley). When the community is doing the work, the community should reap the benefits. Our societies support our community, and the two sponsoring societies, ASPB and SEB, will be able to use the revenues from this journal to support their important work in education, outreach, networking, and the advancement of plant science.

Starting a new journal also allowed us to look at the way we run our journals with a fresh eye. The past 20 years have seen a wide variety of innovations in scientific publishing, including journals moving online and the proliferation of open access journals. Nonetheless, for many researchers the publishing process continues to be slow, frustrating, and wasteful of authors’ and reviewers’ time. Manuscripts pass through multiple stages of review and revision, sometimes spanning multiple journals, each using new reviewers. Although this process improves many papers, it also greatly delays when the science becomes available to the scientific community. There are three features of Plant Direct that will improve the speed, efficiency, and openness of the publication process:

  • strong promotion of preprint posting at submission;

  • referred reviews from Plant Physiology, The Plant Cell, and The Plant Journal—that is, manuscripts will be easily transferred for consideration along with any accompanying reviewer reports; and

  • publication of anonymous reviewer reports upon acceptance.

These features will speed scientific communication in two ways. The preprint is visible to the scientific community immediately, although readers must judge for themselves the work’s technical merit. This visibility has major benefits for authors, especially junior scientists applying for fellowships, grants, and jobs, by showing their great science to the world. It also benefits readers who are not in the author’s close-knit network and thus may not be able to put the author’s hard work to use to move their field forward until it is published as a peer-reviewed article. We think that preprints offer such a strong benefit to the community that we will give you a discount on your publication charges if your manuscript is posted on a preprint server at the time of submission to Plant Direct.

The other features of Plant Direct speed the publication process by reducing or eliminating steps that contribute to delays. Allowing transfer of manuscripts from referring journals, or from the bioRxiv preprint server, will save authors the hassle of entering manuscript metadata multiple times. Referred reviews from participating journals allow the editor to benefit from previous reviews and may remove altogether the need to send the manuscript out for review, thereby reducing reviewer workload. The publication of reviewer comments will make the process more open and help to ensure the integrity and transparency of the review process.

We are also going to be working with our author, reviewer, and editor community to identify and implement new ways to reduce the bottlenecks in the publication process. We will host a series of discussions in spring/summer 2017, both online (at Plantae.org) and at scientific meetings, to brainstorm new ideas and gauge the support for these ideas and ideas already in circulation. Please let us know your thoughts on these efforts as well as how we can make the publishing process better. We are also interested in ideas on how to incorporate mentorship and training of postdoctorals and graduate students into the publishing process.



往期文章推荐:(直接点击浏览)

Plant Physiology:lncRNA增强植物抗旱、盐分等非生物胁迫

简讯:全球首例便携式DNA测序仪完成田间病害测序

Cell Host & Microbe:新基因编辑工具CRISPR-Cas10效率更高!

2017中科院院士候选人:植物生命科学领域何祖华、刘耀光、谢道昕、种康等光荣上榜

震撼:党的十八大以来中国科学院重大科技成果展

方舟子:“双一流学科主任”涉嫌论文造假被撤稿

Nature plants:醋能帮助作物抗旱

学术老虎?一长江学者被50万元“绊倒”

福建农林大学海峡联合研究院:打造东南沿海的“植物界硅谷”(视频)

这项"诺奖"不管颁给谁,中国已经走在世界前列

2017/10/03 生命科学类就业岗位信息发布(含国外博后)

PaperRSS:公众号后台下的科研实力分布(深度好文)

Science: 利用工程肠道共生细菌助力蚊子抵抗疟原虫

20171006 生命科学领域三篇文献updates:眼泪发电:光遗传学:CRISPR在植物中的应用(综述)

诺贝尔奖为何最权威?——因为获奖者不用像乞丐一样填表和自吹!(深度好文)

2017/10/03 生命科学类就业岗位信息发布(含国外博后)

今天刷屏了:研究生的未来在哪里?(深度好文)

18岁少女的发明获国家专利,让你再也不怕远光灯

《中国普通高校创新能力监测报告2016》出炉: 全国八成SCI论文出自高校

20171014植物界文献更新:番茄纳米孔测序;植物Cas9优化;水稻BR发现新蛋白;下胚轴伸长机制;两小花穗增产

Nature Communications:水稻去驯化及杂草稻环境适应遗传机制被揭示

UCLA招聘biomedicine方向博士后,起始年薪$48214+benefits

快讯:全球最大的植物工厂在中国诞生

1149.02公斤!超级杂交稻亩产创世界新纪录

重磅推出:《2017海归就业力调查报告》发布




免责声明

部分文章和信息来源于互联网,不代表本订阅号赞同其观点并对其真实性负责。如转载内容涉及版权等问题,小编将迅速采取删除措施。本订阅号原创内容,转载时,请注明来源“PaperRSS”。







温馨提示

为方便小木虫里研究生们的科研生活交流。PaperRss微信公众平台特建立了两个全国博士就业交流群。建群半年已来,两群成员已经达到700多人。成员包含了美国、欧洲、日本、清华北大、中科院名校、地方大学博士以及企业经理,HR等;涉及各学科领域方向。欢迎各位新人直接搜索 IGDB2010 刚哥微信号申请加入,入群请务必注明“姓名-单位-研究方向”。





您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存