区域平衡性干预政策对共同富裕影响机制研究——兼论要素投入与效率的“得”与“失”

The Impact Mechanism of Regional Balanced Intervention Policies on Common Prosperity: Also on the “Gains and Losses” of Factor Input and Efficiency

《财经研究》2023年49卷第12期 页码：48-61 online：2023年12月3日

作者

中：洪竞科1 , 蒋静雅1 , 刘炳胜2

英：Hong Jingke1, Jiang Jingya1, Liu Bingsheng2

作者单位：1. 重庆大学 管理科学与房地产学院，重庆 400045; 2. 重庆大学 公共管理学院，重庆 400045

摘要及关键词

摘要：在新时代国家区域协调战略和共同富裕理念背景下，文章探究空间尺度干预政策调控个体层面共同富裕过程中存在的“得”与“失”，这对发挥区域协调政策调控的精准性具有重要意义。文章运用2001—2017年中国30个省份的面板数据，研究了区域平衡性干预政策对共同富裕的影响及作用机制。实证结果表明，平衡性干预政策对共同富裕有显著促进作用。在此作用中，资本存量发挥正向中介作用，全要素生产率对共同富裕存在“遮掩效应”，而劳动存量中介作用有限。进一步研究表明：第一，平衡性干预政策主要通过提升居民富裕水平以促进共同富裕；第二，平衡性干预政策主要通过要素质量、配置、流动与升级影响全要素生产率；第三，劳动力流动在平衡性干预政策影响共同富裕过程中发挥中介作用。文章以区域平衡性干预政策为出发点，评估该政策对推进共同富裕的有效性，为共同富裕的理论与实践提供参考。

关键词：平衡性干预政策；共同富裕；劳动力流动

Summary: The pursuit of common prosperity constitutes a foundational tenet of socialism and stands as a prominent facet of the Chinese-style modernization paradigm. The advancement of harmonized regional development emerges as an inexorable requisite and the fundamental rationale for realizing common prosperity of the society. Within the present historical epoch dedicated to the enhancement of societal common prosperity, it becomes paramount to scrutinize the efficacy of spatial-scale intervention policies in engendering common prosperity at the individual level. Using the panel data encompassing 30 provinces in China from 2001 to 2017, this paper employs the econometric model to delve into the ramification and underlying mechanism of regional balanced intervention policies on common prosperity. The results show that the policies markedly elevate common prosperity. This effect is underscored by a positive mediating role of capital stock, a negative mediating impact of TFP, and a delimited contribution from labor stock. Subsequent investigations elucidate the following aspects: First, balanced intervention policies advance common prosperity by enriching the citizenry. Second, balanced intervention policies yield their impact on TFP through the enhancement of factor quality, the judicious allocation of resources, the facilitation of factor mobility, and the promotion of technological upgrading. Third, labor mobility plays a pivotal mediating role in the positive effect of balanced intervention policies on common prosperity, with its significance being particularly pronounced in instances of familial labor mobility. Henceforth, governmental authorities are well-advised to synergistically deploy policy instruments encompassing income distribution, industrial division, digital transformation, and household registration to harness the precision of balanced intervention policies in the pursuit of common prosperity. The contributions of this paper are as follows: First, from an empirical perspective, it evaluates the effectiveness of balanced intervention policies on common prosperity. Second, from a theoretical perspective, it examines “gains and losses” of factor input and efficiency in shaping common prosperity. Third, it unveils the mechanism by which the institutional threshold for settlement exerts an impact on common prosperity. Fourth, it develops a more comprehensive index system for common prosperity measurement.

Key words:balanced intervention policy; common prosperity; labor mobility

其他信息

DOI：10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20230920.401

收稿日期：2023-04-18

基金项目：国家自然科学基金委员会与美国国家科学基金会可持续区域系统合作研究项目（T221101034）；教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（21JZD029）

点

这里“阅读原文”，查看更多