该内容已被发布者删除 该内容被自由微信恢复
文章于 2021年9月25日 被检测为删除。
查看原文
被用户删除
其他

王岗著《明代王府与道教》

转载 川大老子研究院 2021-02-06

The Ming Prince and Daoism: Institutional Patronage of an Elite  BY Richard G. Wang. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.


出版信息


The Ming Prince and Daoism: Institutional Patronage of an Elite

 

作者:Richard G. Wang(王岗)

 

出版:Oxford University Press, 2012

 

页码:301

 

ISBN:978-0199767687

 

 

作者简介


王岗(Richard G. Wang),美国芝加哥大学东亚语言文明系博士,现执教于美国佛罗里达大学语言文学文化系,兼任复旦大学古籍整理研究所、中文系客座教授。主要从事明代的道教、历史文化及文学研究。

 

《茅山志》

《中国近世地方社会中的宗教与国家》

著有The Ming Prince and Daoism,《明代艳情传奇小说:文化操作中的文体、消费与宗教性》、《浪漫情感与宗教精神——晚明文学与文化思潮》等书。点校《茅山志(上、下)》(2016;2018)。合编《中国近世地方社会中的宗教与国家》。


 

内容简介

This book argues that while the promotion of Daoism was a national policy of the Ming (1368–1644) court, the activities and maintenance of local Daoist institutions were the result of royal support from the Ming princes (wang) enfeoffed in provinces. Barred from any serious political or military engagement due to the fanjin (“restrictions towards princes”) system, the Ming princes were ex officio managers of state rituals at the local level, with Daoist priests as key performers, and for this reason they became very closely involved in Daoist clerical and liturgical life. In addition, as the regional overlords, the Ming princes saw financing and organizing temple affairs and rituals, patronizing Daoist priests, or collecting and producing Daoist books as a chance to maintain their influence and show off their power. The prosperity of Daoist institutions also demonstrated the princes’ political success. Like the Six Dynasties Southern aristocrats, or the local elites in Jiangxi and Jiangnan in late imperial times, the Ming princes were subordinated to a higher authority. By aligning themselves in this way with local religious traditions, including Daoism, spiritually as well as politically, the Ming princes ensured themselves a place on the winning side. This kind of enforced relinquishment of autonomy turned many members of Ming princedoms to the spiritual planes not completely controlled by the Confucian state ideology and scholar-officials. In presenting the role the Ming princes played in local religion, this book shows that the princedom served to mediate between the official religious policy and the commoners’ interests.

 

 

目录(简目)

 

Acknowledgments

 

Prologue

 

1. Ming Princes: An Overview

 

2. Princely Ritual Institutions

 

3. Ming Princes and Daoist Ritual

 

4. Cultivation and Books

 

5. Temple Patronage

 

6. Literary Patronage

 

7. Contacts with Clerics and Fashion of Daoist Names

 

Epilogue: The Multifaceted Princely Patronage of a Daoist Temple

 

Appendix A: Genealogical Chart of the Ming Emperors and Their Lines of Descent

 

Appendix B: Numbers of Princes under Each Emperor

 

Notes

 

Bibliography

 

Index



相关阅读

名山志① |《茅山志》(上、下)

致读者 | 四川大学老子研究院2018年图文选辑

回顾 | 2018年度道家道教研究著作概览

刘迅著《摩登道:民国时期上海内丹学的创新、俗众修炼和社团》

书讯 | 高万桑、刘迅主编 Daoism in Modern China

刘迅、高万桑编 Quanzhen Daoists in Chinese Society and Culture,1500-2010

海外道教学④ | 朱越利主编:《理论•视角•方法——海外道教学研究》

欢迎关注四川大学老子研究院

    您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

    文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存