Why Do Human Beings Speak so Many Languages?

↑ Click above to follow us!

点击上方 宝安外语协会 关注我们

There are as many as 7,000 different languages spoken worldwide. How did we get so many? Environment may have played a role.  

Scientists have long known that voices carry differently in dense forests and open plains and in humid air and dry air. Researchers say that the ecosystem and climate in which languages developed might have actually helped shape how they sound.  

"At least some characteristics of different languages were shaped by the climatic and ecological environment in which they were being used," says phonetician and linguist Ian Maddieson.  

"In the clear environment, you can use speech sounds that have very rapid changes and very high-frequency components, but these would be disrupted in transmission if it’s in the more difficult kinds of environment, such as a forested area," says Dr. Maddieson. In an environment with more disruption, languages tend to have more steady sounds, particularly vowels.  

"The basic theory we have is that you’ll have a more kind of consonant-rich language in some environments compared to a more vowel-rich language in others, simply because of the effectiveness of transmission of different types of sounds in different environments," Maddieson says.  

But trees aren’t the only environmental disruption for sound. Maddieson and Dr. Coupé looked at other variables, including elevation, terrain, temperature, and precipitation.  

The researchers found languages with more consonants were associated with rugged terrain and higher elevation. Less consonant-heavy languages tended to match regions with higher tree-cover, warmer temperatures, and more precipitation.  

To determine the relationship between these environmental factors and language development, the researchers compared the sound properties of languages from around the world with the regions in which they originated. To do this, they compared sound and language data with information from the International Steering Committee for Global Mapping, which provides ecosystem and climate data from around the world.  

The scientists evaluated and compared the languages using an index of consonant heaviness, the number of consonants in a language, and how those consonants cluster around syllables.  

The researchers excluded English, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish, and other global languages whose present-day sounds are unlikely to retain links with the environments in which they first developed.  

After looking at over 600 indigenous languages from all over the globe, the researchers concluded that tree-cover and temperature best predicted the consonant heaviness of a region’s language.  

Transmission of sound may not be language’s only environmental hangup.  

Caleb Everett, an anthropological linguist at the University of Miami, has also investigated an environmental link to the evolution of language. Dr. Everett found that languages with complex tones are unlikely to evolve in dry climates.  

"In really dry contexts the human vocal cords operate a little less efficiently," Everett tells the Monitor, in what should not be a surprise to singers.  

After looking at data about how the human larynx works, Everett checked his prediction across databases of languages. He confirmed that languages with complex tone, requiring precise manipulations of pitch, were associated with more humid regions.  

In a 2013 study, Everett examined the link between altitude and ejective consonants, produced by compressing a pocket of air in the throat rather than the lungs, a sound we don’t have in English.  

At the time, he surmised that one explanation could be that the reduced atmospheric pressure made it easier to hold such air pockets in the throat.  

The environment may not be the only factor in language evolution.  

“There’s no reason to think that there are not a lot of other factors that are involved,” says Maddieson.  

Those factors might be social. For example, the way you interact with other people might influence how language might be needed to communicate. Or perhaps the frequency of these interactions might play a role.  

Or perhaps social influences are linked to environmental ones. A 2004 study linked sonority – a measure of loudness and vowel-heaviness — to warmer climates. These researchers suggested that it wasn’t the temperature that lead to increased sonority, it was the intermediate step: how much time people spent indoors.  

People spending a lot of time indoors wouldn’t have to project their voices over far distances, they suggested, while those outdoors might have needed to shout across fields or up mountains.  

End

Editor's Picks 往期推荐

✨👍👏

***所有文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本站立场*** 

---

邮箱：[e-mail]

扫码关注我们  获取更多公益活动信息

▼Extract the QR code to follow us▼

FLA

Official Account

Follow us

     FLA

QQ Group

815613448

Join  us