查看原文
其他

拉加德:如何确保国际发展融资的有效性和可持续性

克里斯蒂娜拉加德 IMI财经观察 2022-05-03

导读


可持续发展目标,即经济繁荣、社会包容和环境可持续性的三位一体,是世界各国努力的方向。但在朝着这一目标前进时,许多国家遇到了不小的挑战。

为了在2030年完成可持续发展目标,各国需要大幅提高自己在医疗、教育及基础设施建设方面的支出,这些额外支出在低收入发展中国家的GDP中平均占15个百分点,这显然是一个相当大的挑战。IMF认为,各国可通过增加税收,提高支出效率,减少腐败,改善商业环境等手段来缓解这一矛盾,同时,发展中国家还需要来自国际社会的双边资助者、国际机构以及私营部门的援助。

债务融资也使一些国家陷入了困境。虽然近年来,全球融资条件相对宽松,许多官方债权人正加紧提供资金,使得低收入国家能够获得更多的融资,但并不是所有的融资人都能很好地管理资金。目前,43%的低收入发展中国家要么面临债务危机的高风险,要么已经陷入债务危机,而在2013年这一比例仅为21%。那么在各国宏观经济局势不稳的情况下,他们该如何克服高支出所带来的挑战呢?

借款国首先应提高公共投资的收益,加强对债务的管理能力,更好的债务管理能够提高透明度,透明度是可持续融资的基础。债权人也应努力促进更高的融资透明度,推动债权人协调机制的改革,帮助债务重组遇阻的国家。最后,各国也可寻求巴黎俱乐部的帮助或借鉴巴黎俱乐部在协调债务危机中的经验和准则。

作者:克里斯蒂娜·拉加德(Christine Lagarde),国际货币基金组织总裁

英文原文如下:


How to Ensure the Effective and Sustainable Financing of International Development

  By Christine Lagarde, IMF Managing Director
                               Paris Forum

                               May 7, 2019

                       As prepared for delivery

Good morning Excellencies, honorable guests, friends, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to thank Minister Le Maire and the organizers of the Paris Forum for inviting me to address this important topic.

Our focus today is on sustainability. Sustainable debt for sustainable growth—and, may I add, on a sustainable planet and for a sustainable future.

The challenge of attaining the SDGs

    


We are all committed to see low-income countries make decisive and lasting advances in development.

This commitment is embodied in the Sustainable Development Goals, or SDGs—the noble trifecta of economic prosperity, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability.

Attaining the SDGs is both an economic and ethical imperative.

Yet we face a steep uphill climb. Our work at the IMF has shown that many countries need to significantly scale up spending to meet the SDGs by 2030.

The additional spending needs in vital areas such as health, education, and priority infrastructure represent as much as 15 percentage points of GDP on average in low-income developing countries—which is equivalent to about half a trillion US dollars in 2030. This is clearly a considerable challenge.

How can this be financed in a way that is sustainable? This is the key question. The first step begins at home—raising more domestic revenue, making spending more efficient, reducing corruption, and improving the business environment.

We believe that countries can raise as much as 5 percentage points of GDP in additional tax revenue—ambitious, but doable.

But this alone will not be enough. Developing countries will also need support from the international community—from bilateral donors, international institutions, and the private sector.

On the latter: It is high time for the private sector to embrace a greater sense of social responsibility, focusing more on long-term development and less on short-term profit. Fortunately, we are seeing far greater interest in “impact investing” and financial instruments that embrace environmental, social, and governance issues. This certainly bodes well for the SDGs.

The financing conundrum


We also need to talk about debt financing, which has become again an issue of concern. Let me drill down a little on this topic.

On one level, of course, there is nothing wrong with borrowing for development—if it is done sustainably. Here, let me share some good news and some not-so-good news.

First, the good news. In recent years, low-income countries have been able to access more financing. This partly reflects relatively easy global financing conditions.

More importantly, we have also seen a diverse group of official creditors step up to make funding available, and sometimes on a very significant scale in support of potentially transformative infrastructure investment.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative has attracted considerable attention in this regard. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has also emerged as an important source of financing, and the Islamic Development Bank’s capital was more than tripled recently.

Now for the not-so-good news. Unfortunately, not all borrowers have managed this increased financing well, and others have been hit by significant economic shocks.

The result has been a rapid rise in the median debt burden to 47 percent of GDP in 2018 for low-income developing countries. The rise has been particularly concentrated in commodity producers.

Forty-three percent of low-income developing countries are currently assessed at either high risk of debt distress or are already in debt distress, compared with 21 percent in 2013.

So how can we get past the conundrum that countries need to spend more while their macroeconomic stability is in jeopardy?

International initiatives


As I survey the landscape, I do see a lot of efforts in the global community to find solutions that contain debt vulnerabilities.

Just to give some examples:

· The German Presidency of the G-20 initiated the Compact with Africa. It stressed the need for better public financial and macroeconomic management, as well as legal and regulatory frameworks to encourage private investment and strengthen borrowing countries’ ability to better manage debt.

· China just announced a new framework for evaluating debt sustainability in Belt and Road recipients—closely aligned with the framework employed by the World Bank and the IMF. We welcome this initiative by an important official creditor.

· And Caribbean countries have been exploring ways to adapt their debt instruments to build resilience against shocks—with the support of the Paris Club, the World Bank, and the IMF.

These are all excellent examples of multilateralism at work, of global solidarity. We need to continue to push these initiatives forward together.

The role of borrowing countries


Of course, borrowing countries themselves have a role to play, first and foremost by raising the payoff from public investment.

Moving from the lowest to the highest public investment efficiency quartile could double the impact of investment on output, and thereby better underpin debt sustainability.

Strengthening debt management will also be crucial. This can be quite tricky. As debt instruments get more complicated, debt management capacity needs to become more sophisticated.

Yet today, only 40 percent of countries meet basic standards for debt recording, while just a third meet standards for reporting and monitoring of guarantees.

Technical assistance will be critical here. Many of you have made contributions to the World Bank-IMF Debt Management Trust Fund, to support this kind of capacity building, and I am extremely grateful for your support.

Backed by this Trust Fund, we will scale up our assistance over the next five years, with the aim to double it.

Better debt management also leads to greater transparency. This is fundamental to sustainable financing.

The role of creditors


Let me now talk about the role of creditors, who have a vital role to play in encouraging greater transparency.

As we have seen in Mozambique, private lenders can effectively facilitate hidden debt. Even for official creditors, non-disclosure agreements or complicated financing modalities can work against transparency.

I therefore welcome the work being done by the Institute of International Finance (IIF) on Principles for Debt Transparency of private creditors.

I also welcome the G-20’s self-assessment relative to its operational guidelines for sustainable financing. I encourage all G-20 members to participate.

It is vitally important to push ahead with further reforms. The new creditor and instrument landscape is making it much harder to help countries restructure their debt.

Recent cases, such as the Republic of Congo and The Gambia, showed that restructurings can be drawn out, in part because we cannot rely on established creditor coordination mechanisms.

And there is no one-size-fits-all solution here. In each of these cases, there was a different set of creditors. There is no one creditor to single out; it is a deeper and broader problem.

Yet there are potential solutions on the table.

The role of the Paris Club


Most importantly, the Paris Club can play an important role in coordinating debt resolution because it incorporates best practices and has a wide membership—recently expanded to include Korea and Brazil.

Wider membership of the Paris Club, including new official and plurilateral creditors, could help secure more rapid and coordinated debt resolutions.

Short of that, any debt restructuring efforts involving non-members would do well to closely follow the tested rules that Paris Club members have used for many years.

Conclusion


Let me conclude this morning by mentioning the role of the IMF and the World Bank in all of this.

Our two institutions have been collaborating closely on a detailed multi-pronged work program to address debt vulnerabilities.

This includes strengthening debt analytics to help lenders and borrowers better understand risks. It also includes improving the quality, comprehensiveness, and transparency of debt data; and strengthening countries’ capacity to manage debt.

Over the coming decade, mobilizing financing to support the SDGs will be one of the most important challenges faced by the global community, but financing needs to be more sustainable than before.

We look forward to working with the international community to develop and implement the ideas to resolve these issues, and welcome today’s forum to help advance our efforts.

After all, it is about the flourishing of all people in a way that respects the limits of nature. What can be more important?

We have identified and acknowledged the challenge, now we must act together to deliver.

Thank you.

编译  韩子砚

编辑  孙建秋

来源  IMF

审校  蒋旭

责编  胡晓涛 金天

监制  朱霜霜


 | 

 | ?

 | 使

 | IMI

欢迎加入群聊

为了增进与粉丝们的互动,IMI财经观察建立了微信交流群,欢迎大家参与。


入群方法:加群主为微信好友(微信号:imi605),添加时备注个人姓名(实名认证)、单位、职务等信息,经群主审核后,即可被拉进群。


欢迎读者朋友多多留言与我们交流互动,留言可换奖品:每月累积留言点赞数最多的读者将得到我们寄送的最新研究成果一份。

关于我们


中国人民大学国际货币研究所(IMI)成立于2009年12月20日,是专注于货币金融理论、政策与战略研究的非营利性学术研究机构和新型专业智库。研究所聘请了来自国内外科研院所、政府部门或金融机构的90余位著名专家学者担任顾问委员、学术委员和国际委员,80余位中青年专家担任研究员。


研究所长期聚焦国际金融、货币银行、宏观经济、金融监管、金融科技、地方金融等领域,定期举办国际货币论坛、货币金融圆桌会议、大金融思想沙龙、麦金农大讲坛、陶湘国际金融讲堂等高层次系列论坛或讲座,形成了《人民币国际化报告》《天府金融指数报告》《金融机构国际化报告》《中国财富管理报告》等一大批具有重要理论和政策影响力的学术成果。2018年研究所荣获中国人民大学优秀院属研究机构奖,在182家参评机构中排名第一。

国际货币网:www.imi.ruc.edu.cn


微信号:IMI财经观察

(点击识别下方二维码关注我们)

理事单位申请、

学术研究和会议合作

联系方式:  

010-62516755 

imi@ruc.edu.cn

只分享最有价值的财经视点

We only share the most valuable financial insights.

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存