Charles Tilly教你评估自己的研究选题与研究贡献:一份checklist
首发时间:2018年12月20日
Ortheory网站贴出了蒂利在2003年10月在一个工作坊上提交的一份checklist,以供各位评估自己的研究选题和研究贡献。转载见下:
AN ALL-PURPOSE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RESEARCH PROPOSALS
研究计划的选题与贡献的checklist
CharlesTilly, Columbia University, October 2003
1. What main questions will your study address?
2. Why, how, and to whom do those questions matter?
3. What sorts of answers to those questions are worth considering?
4. How will your study address the questions? 问题
5. What form will the evidence take? 证据
6. What are some possible conclusions from the evidence? 结论
7. What are the main technical problems you will have to solve? 技术
8. What are the main conceptual problems you will have to solve? 概念
9. What are the main theoretical problems you will have to solve? 理论
10. What are the main practical problems you will have to solve? 实际
11. Where will you start? Why there? 着手点
12. What form will the final product(s) take?成果形式
AN ALL-PURPOSE QUESTIONNAIRE FO RPAPERS, THESES, AND BOOKS
研究成果的价值评估
CharlesTilly, Columbia University, October 2003
1. In one sentence, what question(s) does this work answer?用一句话说你的研究问题是什么
2. In one sentence, what answer(s) does it give?用一句话说你的研究结论是什么
3. Who should care about the question(s)? Why and how?读者是谁?
4. What other answers must we reject if we accept yours?挑战了谁的已有结论?
5. Why should we prefer your answer(s)?凭什么你的就更好
6. How have you investigated the question(s)? 你怎么做的?
7. What arguments and evidence are you presenting for your answer(s)?证据和论证呢?
8. Why should we believe your arguments? Your evidence?
9. If you are right, what general conclusions should we draw?
THE RISK AND LIKELY IMPACT OF SUCCESSFUL INVESTIGATIONS
风险与影响
Charles Tilly, Columbia University, October 2003
RESULTS有几类
Changes Accepted Questions and Answers
Provides New Answers To Old Questions
Challenges Accepted Answers to Old Questions
Confirms Contested Answers To Old Questions
Modifies Accepted Answers To Old Questions
Confirms Accepted Answers To Old Questions
Fills an Information Gap
(Sociological理论大缸第255期)
链接:
纪念蒂利逝世十周年|Sewell:写《旺代》的那位Tilly
反驳蒂利:亦是历史社会学家的涂尔干(Emirbayer,1996)