Legislative Updates (1.3-1.9) | 法宝双语新闻
目录 Contents
【立法】 1. 反垄断法迎来大修 Anti-Monopoly Law Faces An Overhaul 【司法】 2. 最高法发布《善意文明执行意见》 SPC Issued Opinions on Implementing Law with Goodwill and Politeness 3. 《关于深入开展价格争议纠纷调解工作的意见》发布 Opinions Issued on Further Developing the Mediation of Price Disputes 【行政】 4. 中国银保监会发布修订《中国银保监会外资银行行政许可事项实施办法》 Implementation Measures of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission for Administrative Licensing Items concerning Foreign-Funded Banks Revised and Issued by CBIRC
1. 反垄断法迎来大修
Anti-Monopoly Law Faces An Overhaul
1月2日,国家市场监管总局发布《<反垄断法>修订草案(公开征求意见稿)》,意见截止日期为2020年1月31日。
On January 2, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued the Revisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law (Public Draft), and comments may be submitted until January 31, 2020.
《草案》主要包含以下变化:一、新增互联网领域反垄断条款。《草案》明确除现行《反垄断法》规定的普遍适用的依据外,认定互联网领域经营者具有市场支配地位还应当考虑网络效应、规模经济、锁定效应、掌握和处理相关数据的能力等因素。二、加大处罚力度。经营者违反本法规定,达成并实施垄断协议的,罚款上限提至五千万元,是之前的100倍。行业协会违反本法规定,组织经营者达成垄断协议的,处罚上限由五十万元增至五百万元。三、新增公平竞争审查有关条款。征求意见稿拟规定:国家建立和实施公平竞争审查制度,规范政府行政行为,防止出台排除、限制竞争的政策措施。
The Draft mainly includes the following changes:
First, anti-monopoly provisions on Internet field have been added. The Draft clarifies that in addition to the generally applicable basis stipulated in the current Anti-Monopoly Law, elements such as network effects, economies of scale, locking effects, and capacity of mastering and handling relevant data should be taken into account in the determination of whether an operator of Internet has a dominant market position.
Second, the punishment has been increased. For operators concluding and implementing a monopoly agreement in violation of this Law, the maximum penalty is raised to 50 million yuan, which is 100 times the previous level. For industry associations organizing operators to reach a monopoly agreement in violation of this Law, the maximum penalty is increased from 500,000 yuan to 5 million yuan.
Third, relevant clauses on fair competition review have been added. The Public Draft proposes that China establishes and implements a fair competition review system to regulate administrative acts by governments and prevent the unveiling of policies and measures that exclude or restrict competitions.
2020年1月2日上午,最高人民法院召开新闻发布会,发布《最高人民法院关于在执行工作中进一步强化善意文明执行理念的意见》。
On the morning of January 2, 2020, the Supreme People’s Court held a press conference to release the Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Further Strengthening the Ideal of Implementing Law with Goodwill and Politeness.
《意见》分为6大部分,共计22条,主要包括以下三点内容:
一是严格禁止超标的查封和乱查封。冻结被执行人银行账户内存款的,应当明确具体数额,不得影响冻结之外资金的流转和账户的使用;对于体量较大的不动产,如果其价值明显超出债权额,就应当对相应价值部分进行查封。冻结上市公司股票的,应当以债权额为限计算出需要冻结的股票数量。在计算时,每股股票的价值以冻结前一交易日收盘价为基准,一般在不超过20%的幅度内确定。
With a total of 22 articles in six parts, the Opinions mainly include the following three points.
First, strict prohibition of excessive and unauthorized sealing up. In the case of freezing bank savings of the party against whom enforcement is sought, the specific amount shall be specified and the transfer of savings that are outside the frozen assets and the use of the savings account shall not be affected. For a high value real estate, if its value clearly exceeds the number of claims, only the corresponding value portion can be frozen. In the case of freezing stocks of listed companies, the number of shares shall be calculated according to the number of claims, which means that the value of blocked stocks shall not exceed the number of claims. When calculating the number of shares, the value of each stock is based on the closing price of the trading day prior to freezing, generally within a range of no more than 20%.
二是在财产变价环节确保双方当事人利益最大化。如直接变卖的变价款足以清偿执行债务且不损害第三人利益的,即使执行债权人不同意,也可以不经拍卖直接变卖;如被执行人认为法院的评估价过低,通过拍卖方式可能会损害他的利益,而申请以不低于评估价的价格自行变卖财产的,法院经过审查也可以准许。
Second, guarantee of maximizing the interests of both parties through the process of realization of the assets. Where the amount of direct sale is sufficient to pay off the debt and would not harm the interests of a third party, even if the execution creditor does not agree, the property may be sold directly without the process of auction. Where the party against whom enforcement is sought is of the opinion that the appraisal by the court is too low and that their interests may be damaged through auction, they may sell property on their own at a price no lower than the appraisal amount, subject to the examination and approval of the court.
三是严格适用失信名单和限制消费措施。还规定各地法院可结合案件实际情况,给予被执行人一至三个月的宽限期;被限制消费的个人因本人或近亲属罹患重大疾病,或近亲属去世等情形,法院应暂时解除对其乘坐飞机、高铁等限制。
Third, strict application of a dishonesty list and consumption restriction measures. The Opinions also stipulate that local courts may grant a grace period of one to three months to the party against whom enforcement is sought in accordance with the facts of the case. If an individual whose consumption is restricted suffers from a major illness of his own or a close relative or a death of a close relative, the court shall temporarily lift the restriction on their travel by air or high-speed railway.
4. 中国银保监会发布修订《中国银保监会外资银行行政许可事项实施办法》
Legislative Updates(12.27-1.2)
Legislative Updates(12.6-12.12)
客服 | 法小宝
微信 | pkulaw-kefu
微博 | @北大法宝
点击相应图片识别二维码
获取更多信息
北大法宝
北大法律信息网
法宝学堂
法宝智能