查看原文
其他

Vol.265 域外法学 | Law and Philosophy Volume 36 / 2017(Issue 4-6)

法律思想 2022-03-20



关于Law and Philosophy 


 内容简介


Law and Philosophy创刊于1982年,每年一卷,每卷六期。 

越来越多的学者认为,如果能够利用法学和哲学的研究成果,我们可以更好地理解很多问题。但是,法学与哲学这两个领域的期刊并不总是赞同学者们的文章,部分是由于文章的形式(format),更多则是出于方法(approach)的差异。因此,学者们倾向于在自己所属的领域内写作和发表文章,这在一定程度上影响了我们对问题的研究和推进,也抑制了变化的发生。

Law and Philosophy旨在为法理学与法哲学( the disciplines of jurisprudence and legal philosophy)提供讨论的平台,所刊登的文章主要从法学与哲学两种进路展开,促进法律学者与哲学家之间的交流。具体来说,本刊将发表从短论到连续评论不定的文章,并不以文章形式来阻止双方之间的交流(exchange)。比如本刊设立书评栏目,帮助读者了解相关的法学与哲学学术推进。

就文章内容而言,本刊主要面向普通法、大陆法和社会主义法系 (common law, civil law, and the socialist tradition.)等法律传统,主题包括法理论、正义与法律、道德与法律、法效力、法的本质、法律体系、惩罚与责任、正当性、法律推理、义务、职业道德、证据与程序所涉及的认识论问题等。

(摘自发刊词 Volume.1 Issue.1)



 现任编辑


Editors-in-Chief:
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA, USA
John Oberdiek, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA


Associate Editors:       
Larissa Katz, University of Toronto, Canada 
Alec Walen, Rutgers University, USA
Wil Waluchow, McMaster University, Canada
Lorenzo Zucca, Kings College London, UK

Book Review Editor:
Martin Stone, Cardozo Law School, USA


Editorial Board:

B. Bix, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,USA

J. Dickson, University of Oxford, UK

R. A. Duff, University of Stirling, UK 

J. Gardner, University of Oxford, UK

M. Greenberg, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA
A. Kavanagh, University of Oxford, UK
G. Keating, USC Gould School of Law Los Angeles, CA, USA

M. Kramer, University of Cambridge, UK

J. Raz, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

……





文章信息


 Vol. 36, Issue 4


 1、作为代理人犯罪的毒品禁令

Drug Proscriptions as Proxy Crimes

  Douglas Husak  Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 345-366

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9289-1


 2、比较性应得与公平

Comparative Desert Vs. Fairness

  Kerah Gordon-Solmon  Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 367-387

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9293-5


 3、人权的不可分割性

The Indivisibility of Human Rights

  Ariel Zylberman  Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 389-418

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9296-2


 4、什么是仇恨言论?

 第一部分:关于仇恨的谬见

What is hate speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate

  Alexander Brown  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 419–468

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9297-1.pdf


 5、作为最高法则的公共理由

Public Reason as Highest Law

  Gordon Ballingrud  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1-29

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9308-2


 6、清除性杀戮和针对非战斗人员为目标

 关于Seth Lazar的《拯救平民》的评论

Eliminative Killing and the Targeting of Noncombatants 

Comments on Seth Lazar’s Sparing Civilians

  Alec Walen  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1-13

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9310-8


 7、私人正义:超越罗尔斯的框架

Justice in Private: Beyond the RawlsianFramework

  Hanoch Dagan, Avihay Dorfman  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1-31

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9309-1


 8、义务的概念被道德化了吗?

Is the Concept of Obligation Moralized? 

  Kenneth Einar Himma  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1-25

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9311-7


 9、《保护平民》中两害相权取其轻的困境

The Lesser Evil Dilemma for Sparing Civilians

  Yitzhak Benbaji  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1-25

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9312-6




 Vol. 36, Issue 5


 1、实践态度与法律的规范性

Attitude and the normativity of law

  Jeffrey Kaplan  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 469-493

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9304-6


 2、作为自治权的主权

Sovereignty as Autonomy

 Raf Geenens Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 495–524https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9295-3


 3、边沁对普通法的阐述

Bentham’s Exposition of Common Law

  Xiaobo Zhai  Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 525–560

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9298-0


 4、法律中的客观性与道义性语言

Detachment and Deontic Language in Law Robert Mullins Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 1-34

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9313-5

 

 5、国际法,制度化的道德推理与国家分离

International Law, Institutional Moral Reasoning, and Secession 

 David Lefkowitz Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 1-29

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9316-2


Book Review


 6、Christopher J.Finlay 的恐怖主义与抵

 抗权:一个关于正义的革命性战争的理论

Christopher J.Finlay’s Terrorism and theRight to Resist: A Theory of Just Revolutionary War.

 Hadassa Noorda Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp.339. $99.00.


 7、世界性义务与合法的国家权威

Cosmopolitan Duty and Legitimate State Authority

 Jamie Robertson Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 1-30

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9318-0


 8、对开放性未来的权利的重新阐释:

从自治性到真实性

Reinterpreting the Right to an Open Future: From Autonomy to Authenticity

 Scott Altman Published online: April 2017, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 1-30

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9317-1





 Vol. 36, Issue 6



 1、反思犯罪化中的错误性约束

Rethinking the Wrongness Constraint on Criminalisation

 Andrew Cornford
 Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 615-649

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9299-z.pdf


 2、立法中的三种意图

Three Kinds of Intention in Lawmaking

 Marcin Matczak
 Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 651-674

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9302-8.pdf


 3、公共理由与宗教:

 关于管制的神学-伦理平衡论证

Public Reason and Religion: The Theo-Ethical Equilibrium Argument for Restraint

 Paul Billingham Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 675-705

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9303-7.pdf


 4、谁在乎你想什么?

 刑事罪责与未显明的精神状态的不相关性

Who Cares What You Think? Criminal Culpability and the Irrelevance of Unmanifested Mental States

 Alexander Sarch Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 707-750

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9301-9.pdf


 5、建构性“共识”:一个成问题的虚构

Constructive “Consent”: A Problematic Fiction

 M. Beth Valentine Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1-23

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10982-017-9320-6


 6、诽谤定义的规范性基础

The Normative Foundations of Defamatory Meaning

 Adam Slavny Published online: February 2017, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1-25

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10982-017-9321-5.pdf




本期由中国政法大学2016级法学理论专业硕士研究生王蕾、孙莎莎、陈皓翔翻译

译责由法思承担








法律思想





本文系“域外法学”系列第3期

感谢您的阅读  欢迎关注并分享





往期推荐 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.154 乌尔弗里德·诺依曼:法律方法论与法律论证理论 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.155 罗伯特·阿列克西:作为理性商谈的法律论证 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.156 雷 磊:法律论证的功能、进路与立场 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.157 冉 杰:法律论证理论评述 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.158 王 琳:试析法律论证理论的性质 | 法律论证的定位


更多专题 关注我们

法思百期精选:Vol 101.2【法思】百期特辑

教师节专题:Vol.216 法思专题索引






法律思想|中国政法大学法理学研究所

微信ID:lawthinkers

邮箱:lawthinkers@126.com

法律思想,每周一三五19:00为您推送


您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存