查看原文
其他

Vol. 284 域外法学|The Journal Jurisprudence 2017年卷

法律思想 法律思想 2022-03-20



关于The Journal Jurisprudence1


内容简介


在2008年,澳大利亚一所重要的大学开始用一个口号来推广其研究生法学项目:“不要迷失在法律理论中,到法律实践中去!”你们可能认为我比较老派,但我相信,如果要成为一名高效的律师,法官,甚或是法律秘书,他们应该从根本上理解其所处法律体系的潜在依据。法哲学,或者法理学,对法律的实际应用至关重要。

当代法学教育割裂了实践与理论,在筹办《法理学杂志》的过程中,我试图弥合这个裂隙。法理学领域处于法律与政治、实践与哲学的联结之处。通过理解法律的理论基础,法理学能够启发我们在更大的哲学框架中去理解法律结构。

本刊每年出版四次。每一期都会关注本学科中的一个核心问题。欢迎律师、哲学家、法学家、学者及非专业人士提交与当期核心问题直接或间接相关的文章。除其他因素外,文章将会根据对非专业读者而言的可读性进行收录。如果我们试图弥合理论与实践之间不断扩大的裂隙,本刊的读者必须不能只是法理学学者。

In 2008, a major Australian university began promoting its new graduate lawprogram with the tag line, “Don’t get lost in legal theory, get into practice!”Call me old fashioned, but I believe that to be an effective lawyer, judge oreven legal secretary, one should understand the underlying rational for one’slegal system. Legal philosophy, or jurisprudence, is central to practicalapplication of law.

Contemporary legal education has disconnected practice and theory, and in convening TheJournal Jurisprudence, I am seeking to bridge this gap. The field ofjurisprudence lies at the nexus of law and politics, the practical and thephilosophical. By understanding the theoretical foundations of law,jurisprudence can inform us to the place of legal structures within largerphilosophical frameworks.

The Journal is issued four times per year. Each edition will focus on a keyquestion of the discipline. Lawyers, philosophers, jurists, academics and layindividuals are welcome to submit articles addressing, directly or indirectly,the edition’s key question. Articles will be curated based upon, among otherthings, accessibility to lay readers. If we are to bridge the ever-widening gapbetween theory and practice, this journal must be read by more than just jurisprudentialscholars.

主编:Dr Aron Ping D’Souza

来源:http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/index.htm



现任编辑

Editor(主编):


Dr Aron Ping D'Souza

Stawell Chambers, Melbourne and

Lately =of theUniversity of Melbourne

 


Past Guest Editors(往期客座编辑):

 

Dr. Jur. Eric Engle

Harvard University

 

Richard Mullender

Reader, Newcastle Law School

Newcastle University

 

Professor ThomasBoudreau

Salisbury University 

 

Associate Professor Juan Carlos Sainz-Borgo

The University for Peace

 

Professor BrianPolkinghorn

Salisbury University

 

Mr Trent J Smyth

Consul of the Republicof Malawi for Australia

 

Stephen Keim, SC

Higgins Chambers,Brisbane

 


Past Contributors(过去的贡献者):

 

Assistant Professor Kyle A. Scott

University of North Florida

 

Dr Ofer Raban

University of Oregon

 

Mr Jesse Ram Merriam

Johns Hopkins University

 

Dr Nehaluddin Ahmad

Multimedia University of Malaysia

 

Mr Jason S. Crye

Roger Williams University

 

Mr Benjamin Taibleson

Yale University

 

Dr. Jur. Eric Engle

Harvard University

 

Professor NicholasMercuro

Michigan State University

 

Dr Martin Gramatikov

Tilburg University

 

Associate ProfessorAdam J. MacLeod

Faulkner University

……




文章信息2


Volume 31, Hilary Term 2017

 



1


对自由意志论者的挑战的挑战

A Challenge to the Libertarian Challenge

 Bret N. Bogenschneider http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris31/bb.pdf



2


性别:澳大利亚法律中的“发展”

GENDER: ‘DEVELOPMENTS’ IN AUSTRALIAN LAW

 Allan Ardill 

http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris31/aa.pdf


 


3


宪法文化,宪法典籍,宪法粘合度:正式与非正式的匹配

ConstitutionalCulture, Constitutional Parchment and ConstitutionalStickiness: Matching the Formal and the Informal

 Nikolai Wenzel http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris31/nw.pdf





Volume 32, Trinity Term 2017

 


1


现代美国商法的背景

The Background of Modern American Business Law

 William J. Carney http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris32/carney.pdf



2


法律中的人权结构:为所谓合法的权利设立标准

THE STRUCTURE OF AHUMAN RIGHT IN LAW: SETTING THE CRITERION FOR A RIGHT LEGALLY SO-CALLED

 

Catherine S. Namakula

 http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris32/namakula.pdf




3


《错误定罪中的安全问题》(作者:Boaz Sangero)——书评

Safety from FalseConvictions by Boaz Sangero – Book Review

 Doron Menashe, Sivan Biber http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris32/menasche.pdf




4


对州主权豁免的原始理解

The OriginalUnderstanding of State Sovereign Immunity

 Tristan Dunford http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris32/dunford.pdf




Volume 33, Michaelmas Term 2017

 


1


一种更好的失败方式:向中国律师教授批判性思维

A Better Wayto Fail: Teaching Critical Thinking to Chinese Lawyers

 Robin Nilon http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris33/nilon.pdf




2


利用法律的不确定性:犹太法理学中的法治

Leveraging Legal Indeterminacy: The Rule of Law in Jewish Jurisprudence

 Shlomo C. Pill http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris33/pill.pdf




Volume 34, Hilary Term 2017



1


主权的诠释学:古罗马帝国晚期的书面语、国家主权与宗教自由

The Hermeneutics of Sovereignty: The Written Word, State Sovereignty, and Freedom of Religion in the Late Antiquity Roman Empire

 C.G. Bateman http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris34/bateman.pdf




2


司法系统在剥夺土著居民土地中的作用:以色列的贝都因人案

The Role ofthe Judiciary in Dispossessing Indigenous Peoples’ Land: The Bedouin Case inIsrael

  Morad Elsana  http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris34/elsana.pdf





本期由中国政法大学2016级法学理论专业硕士研究生王蕾、孙莎莎翻译




法律思想



本文系“域外法学”系列第9期

感谢您的阅读  欢迎关注并分享



往期推荐 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.154 乌尔弗里德·诺依曼:法律方法论与法律论证理论 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.155 罗伯特·阿列克西:作为理性商谈的法律论证 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.156 雷 磊:法律论证的功能、进路与立场 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.157 冉 杰:法律论证理论评述 | 法律论证的定位

Vol.158 王 琳:试析法律论证理论的性质 | 法律论证的定位


更多专题 关注我们

法思百期精选:Vol 101.2【法思】百期特辑

教师节专题:Vol.216 法思专题索引

2017推送合集:Vol.263 法思2017推送合辑





法律思想|中国政法大学法理学研究所

微信ID:lawthinkers

邮箱:lawthinkers@126.com

法律思想,每周一三五19:00为您推送



您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存