查看原文
其他

顶级期刊 | Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2018年第1期目录|摘要

2018-04-03

作者 李婷婷 张俊娜


青年会计学者联合发起会计领域NO.1高端自媒体


传播会计前辈思想,引领青年一代成长

因缘分相聚,因互助成长,因智慧光华


35所国外院校学者加入"华人高端会计金融学术群"


 第一时间关注会计学术联盟的精彩推送

目   录

1.Accounting and economic consequences of CEO paycuts

Gerald J.Lobo ,Hariom Manchiraju and SriS.Sridharan

2.Effects of SOX 404(b) implementation on audit fees by SEC filer size category

Michael Ettredge,Matthew G. Sherwood and Lili Sun

3.Political uncertainty and firms' information environment: Evidence from China

Yunsen Chen ,Deqiu Chen ,Weimin Wang and Dengjin Zheng

4.The influence of business strategy on annual report readability

Edwin KiaYang Lim ,Keryn Chalmers and Dean Hanlon

5.Determinants and economic consequences of cash flow restatements

Elio Alfonso,Andrew Christie,Dana Hollie and Shaokun (Carol) Yu

1

1.Accounting and economic consequences of CEO paycuts

Gerald J.Lobo ,Hariom Manchiraju and SriS.Sridharan

Abstract: Boards sometimes cut a CEO’s pay following poor performance. This study examines whether such CEO paycuts really work. We identify 1,496 instances of large CEO paycuts during the period 1994–2013. We then create a propensity-score-matched control group of firms that did not cut their CEOs’ pay and employ a difference-in-differences approach to examine the consequences of paycuts. Our results show that, following a paycut, CEOs are likely to engage in earnings management in an attempt to accelerate improvement in the reported performance and to achieve a speedier restoration of their pay to pre-cut levels. Further, we find that improvement in long-term performance after a paycut occurs only for those firms with lower levels of earnings management after the paycut. Finally, we show that paycuts are more likely to lead to unintended value-destroying consequences in the absence of high institutional ownership or when the CEO is sufficiently entrenched, thereby impairing the effectiveness of internal monitoring by boards.

Key  words:Executive compensation; Pay cut; Earnings management; Agency theory


2

2.Effects of SOX 404(b) implementation on audit fees by SEC filer size category

Michael Ettredge,Matthew G. Sherwood and Lili Sun

Abstract: This study provides novel information about the consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) by documenting differential audit fee shocks accompanying implementation of SOX 404(b) internal control tests and reports for clients in three size categories: large accelerated filers (LAFs), small accelerated filers (SAFs), and non-accelerated filers (NAFs). First, we find that although both LAFs and SAFs experience audit fee shocks attributable to 404(b), SAFs on average experience relatively greater fee shocks than LAFs (107.8% versus 84.6%; Table 6). Second, even though NAFs are not subject to 404(b) procedures, we document a 42.7% fee shock for NAFs. Our interpretation is that 404(b) generated an immediate increase in demand for audit services with no corresponding sudden increase in supply of experienced audit personnel, enabling audit firms to charge higher prices for all filers including NAFs. We find that audit fee shocks attributable to 404(b) are positively associated with audit offices’ bargaining power relative to clients, and that the effect of offices’ bargaining power is strongest for SAFs and weakest for NAFs. Although higher audit fees (with client characteristics held constant) are often considered an indicator of better audit quality, we find virtually no evidence that the massive fee increases in 2004 are accompanied by improvements in same-year or next-year audit quality, measured as decreases in discretionary accruals and a lower likelihood of subsequent restatements of audited financial reports.

Key  words:SOX 404(b); Internal controls; Audit fees; Accelerated filers; Non-accelerated filers; Audit office; Bargaining power


3

3.Political uncertainty and firms' information environment: Evidence from China

Yunsen Chen ,Deqiu Chen ,Weimin Wang and Dengjin Zheng

Abstract: How political uncertainty affects the supply of value relevant information about a firm is an important but unresolved question. Using an emerging market setting where political leaders are expected to exert significant influence on economic activities, we examine the effect of political uncertainty caused by turnovers of local government leaders on a firm’s information environment. We find that during periods of political uncertainty, the total amount of idiosyncratic information about a firm that is available to the market is reduced. The adverse effect on information supply is manifest in firms that are more politically dependent and stronger when uncertainty is more severe. Further, we provide evidence suggesting that firms react to political uncertainty by reducing the amount and the quality of information provided to investors. We find that information intermediaries such as financial analysts and the media have a moderating effect on the information environment as they increase the production of information during periods of political uncertainty. However, these intermediaries do not negate the net loss of information.

Key  words:Political uncertainty; Information environment; Emerging market; China

4

4.The influence of business strategy on annual report readability

Edwin KiaYang Lim ,Keryn Chalmers and Dean Hanlon

Abstract: Concerns about the complexity of firm disclosures have prompted regulators to initiate projects to improve the readability of annual reports. We investigate business strategy as a determinant of annual report readability. As business strategy fundamentally determines a firm’s product and market domain, technology, and organizational structure, it influences a firm’s operating complexity, environmental uncertainty and information asymmetry. Consequently, business strategy frames the level, wording, and complexity of disclosures. We capture a firm’s business strategy based on the Miles and Snow (1978) strategic typology and measure 10-K readability with Li’s (2008) Fog index. We find that firms pursuing an innovation-oriented prospector strategy have less readable 10-Ks relative to firms pursuing an efficiency-oriented defender strategy. We also find that prospectors display more negative and uncertainty tones while defenders exhibit more litigious tone in their 10-Ks. Our study provides useful insights to policy makers as it suggests that efforts to improve annual report readability may be limited for some firms given that business strategy is a fundamental determinant of readability and pronouncements accommodating different strategic orientations are not feasible.

Key  words:Annual report readability; Business strategy; Fog index

5

5.Determinants and economic consequences of cash flow restatements

Elio Alfonso,Andrew Christie,Dana Hollie and Shaokun (Carol) Yu

Abstract: The FASB, PCAOB, SEC, and AICPA have all acknowledged that the accounting field needs to revisit the statement of cash flows (SCF). While the overall number of restatements has held steady over the past five years, the percentage of cash flow restatements (CFRs) has risen from 8.7% of all restatements in 2009 to 20.2% of all restatements in 2014. We examine the determinants of CFRs, investors’ differential beliefs about CFRs, and the information content of CFRs by focusing on abnormal trading volume and price reactions to CFRs. We then examine whether the guidance the SEC/AICPA published in early 2006 changed the information content of CFRs. Finally, since the proper classification within the SCF is a current regulatory issue, we examine whether classification shifting within the SCFs impacts the market. The market finds CFRs to be informative with some investor disagreement as shown by higher abnormal trading volume. We also find an incremental volume reaction to changes in operating cash flows after the SEC allowance period. While the market responds negatively to CFRs, we find that the market does not differentiate between whether classification shifting occurs or does not occur with the CFR. This study has implications for policymakers, auditors, and investors since it is one of the first to examine the capital market consequences of CFRs

Key  words:Trading volume reaction; Stock price reaction; Cash flow restatement; Statement of cash flows; Cash flows; Reclassifications

推荐阅读

中国会计学会2018年学术年会(安徽财经大学,7月14-15日)

中国会计学会会计基础理论专业委员会 2018年学术研讨会(北方民大,6月2日-3日)

中国会计学会财务管理专业委员会2018学术年会(吉林财大,6月23-24日)

中国会计学会高等工科院校分会第25届年会(西安理工,10月27-28日)

中国会计学会审计专业委员会2018年学术年会(铜陵学院,9月21-23日)

第七届“公共管理、公众财政与政府会计跨学科研究论坛”暨第九届“政府会计改革理论与实务研讨会”征文

第二届“龙马会计与财务国际研讨会”征稿通知(中央财经大学,6月16日)

第三届生态文明审计理论创新发展论坛 暨2018当代会计两岸研讨会 (6月23日. 济南)

China Journal of Accounting Studies 2018年第一次学术研讨会(重大,5月11日)

The 2nd CCGAR Research Camp on Auditing and Accounting(西南财经大学,5月25-26日)

第十一届(2018年)中国金融评论国际研讨会(上海,6月9-10日)

第十一届中国北美会计教授年会 (南京,7月19-21日)

第十届会计史学术研讨会征文(佳木斯,8月中下旬)

第十届(2018)金融风险与公司金融国际研讨(大连,7月6日-8日)

《当代会计评论》2018春季学术研讨会(长春)

The International Accounting Symposium(ARA

中国商业会计学会2018年学术年会(郑州航院,6月2-3日)

中国会计学会审计专业委员会2018年学术年会(铜陵学院,9月21-23日) 


重磅|2018年审计理论研究指南

2018年中国MPAcc学生案例大赛|第一阶段案例公布

中山大学林斌教授|喜获国家社科基金重大项目立项

秦荣生:管理会计是提高会计服务质量的重要手段

田高良:财务管理(ACCA)国家级双语教学示范课

CJAS、CJAR 首次进入ABS Academic Journal Guide 2018期刊目录


学术热点|IASB发布修订版《财务报告概念框架》

人大复印报刊资料《财务与会计导刊》理论版近三年选题侧重与转载主题分析

人大复印报刊资料《财务与会计导刊》理论版近三年研究热点和研究范式分析

人大复印报刊资料《财务与会计导刊》理论版近三年重要转载来源作者、机构和期刊分析

本期编审人员

材料提供 | 石河子大学   在读会计硕士生   李婷婷

执行编辑丨沈阳理工大学  在读会计硕士生  张俊娜

审核编辑 | 青岛科技大学 在读会计硕士生 王宏斌

终审 | 西北师范大学大学 在读会计硕士生  杨   阳

主编|北京交通大学会计系博士生  水皮(李高波)

欢迎大家分享和转发朋友圈



“会计学术联盟”旗下优质社群推荐

“打造全球会计生态圈,服务有缘成长~”


欢迎诸位加入会计学术联盟旗下的“微信群”,希望大家积极贯彻联盟发展理念:传播会计前辈思想,引领青年一代成长;发扬联盟发展文化:传正能量,广交朋友,整合资源,服务成长~


1、会计学院院长(系主任)交流群(218人)

邀请人品正,热心、靠谱、积极、上进的愿意促进校际合作,推动会计学术联盟研讨会或报告进校园的朋友加入,加群请联系微信610997158,申请好友主题:“称呼+单位简称+学历+职称”


2、中国高校会计师联盟群(715人)

邀请人品正,热心、靠谱、积极、上进的一线教学的朋友加入,加群请联系微信610997158,申请好友主题:“称呼+单位简称+学历+职称”


3、财务报表分析特色微信群(395人)

财务报表分析领域大咖在群里不定期答疑,邀请人品正,热心、靠谱、积极、上进的学术界、教育界、实务界朋友加入,加群请联系微信610997158,申请好友主题:“称呼+单位简称+学历+职称”


4、中华会计博士开心驿站群(426人),仅海内外会计领域博士(生)加入,管理严格。邀请人品正,热心、靠谱、积极、上进的朋友加入,加群请联系微信610997158,申请好友主题:“称呼+单位简称+学历+职称”


5、华人高端会计金融学术交流群(157人)

加强对象A、首先人品好;B、活跃在会计科研一线的有缘朋友,能认同广交朋友,传正能量,热心助人成长的理念,博士或在读博士,且满足以下其一:


1)有在国外SSCI期刊发表文章;2)在国外大学任教或读会计金融领域博士;

3)在国内《经济研究》《管理世界》《会计研究》《审计研究》《金融研究》《中国会计评论》CJAR、CAFR、CJAS、国家自科基金委A刊、发表文章,或至少发表三篇CSSCI有冲劲的优秀盟友!


目前已有100多位学者加入,全部为会计金融领域博士,其中50%以上具有教授职称,30多位博导,近一半是来自英国、北美、澳洲、新西兰、新加坡的教授或博士。加群申请,请联系群主(微信610997158),加好友请注明:称呼+单位+学历/职称,感谢您的配合


会计学术联盟-社群管理部

2018年4月3日


投稿或合作,请联系微信:610997158


    您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

    文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存