涉借贷纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例

北大法宝出“法宝双语案例”栏目。本栏目选取近期热门司法案例进行双语发布，每两周一期，欢迎关注！感谢新老朋友对北大法宝的大力支持，我们会持续为大家提供更好的法律信息服务。本周推送第九十七期，主要关注涉借贷纠纷案例！

本期双语案例推送梁翰辉与翁秀聪民间借贷纠纷再审案等涉借贷纠纷案例。

目录

Contents

1.梁翰辉与翁秀聪民间借贷纠纷再审案

Liang Hanhui v. Weng Xiucong (retrial case regarding dispute over private lending)

2.黄金龙、莆田市东南香米业发展有限公司民间借贷纠纷二审民事判决书

Huang Jinlong v. Putian Dongnanxiang Rice Industry Development Co., Ltd. (civil judgment for second instance regarding dispute over private lending)

3.潘新群、潘铁民民间借贷纠纷二审民事判决书

Pan Xinqun v. Pan Tiemin (civil judgment for second instance regarding dispute over private lending)

一、梁翰辉与翁秀聪民间借贷纠纷再审案

Liang Hanhui v. Weng Xiucong (retrial case regarding dispute over private lending)

【裁判摘要】

借贷关系纠纷中的当事人对自己诉讼请求，应当提供能够证明借贷关系的相关证据。对于此种证据形式，法律有明确的规定，只有具备法定形式要件的证据才具有证明力。当事人向人民法院提供相应的证据材料，仅加盖单位印章，而没有单位负责人及制作证明材料的人员签名或者盖章，不符合法定的证据的形式要件，人民法院不予采信。

[Judgment Abstract]

A party to a lending dispute should, in order to support its claims, provide competent evidence on the debtor-creditor relationship which, pursuant to laws, should be of no probative value unless it holds statutory formal elements. The evidence without statutory formal elements provided by a party concerned is not admitted by people’s courts if it only bears the enterprise’s seal and has no signature or seal of the person in charge or the person who has made supporting materials.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.118614332

[CLI Code] CLI.C.118614332(EN)

二、黄金龙、莆田市东南香米业发展有限公司民间借贷纠纷二审民事判决书

Huang Jinlong v. Putian Dongnanxiang Rice Industry Development Co., Ltd. (civil judgment for second instance regarding dispute over private lending)

【裁判摘要】

恶意串通，订立损害国家、集体或第三人利益的合同无效。实践中，借款协议明确约定，为筹备上市公司全权委托股东代表公司办理全部借款所需资金手续，公司以保证人身份对该借款提供连带责任担保，故股东的借款行为系公司授权，非用于个人目的，公司主张股东超出授权范围与债权人恶意串通签订的借款担保合同损害其利益，但不能提供事实依据予以证明的，公司应当按约承担连带保证责任。

[Judgment Abstract]

A contract is invalid if it is concluded by the parties thereto through malicious collusion against the interests of the country, groups, or any third party. In legal practice, a loan contract clearly stipulates that the shareholder of the company is fully and duly authorized to undertake loan business for the purpose of raising funds for the company’s listing, and the company assumes joint and several liability as the surety for the loan. Therefore, the shareholder is deemed to borrow the money upon the authorization of the company for a purpose other than personal needs. If the company complains that its interests are damaged as the shareholder signs the loan contract in collusion with the creditor beyond the extent of the authorization, but fails to produce factual evidence to prove its charge, then the company should assume the joint and several liability as agreed in the contract.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.108379136

[CLI Code] CLI.C.108379136(EN)

三、潘新群、潘铁民民间借贷纠纷二审民事判决书

Pan Xinqun v. Pan Tiemin (civil judgment for second instance regarding dispute over private lending)

【裁判摘要】

当事人提交记载款项往来和备注的对账单、借据、欠条等证据能够印证双方当事人之间借款事实发生的，可以认定双方间系民间借贷法律关系。当事人一方依据在民间借贷合同之后签订的投资合作协议提出抗辩,主张双方已由民间借贷法律关系变更为合伙协议法律关系，但不能提供依据证明的，应当基于民间借贷关系按约返还对方当事人的借款本金及利息。

[Judgment Abstract]

A private lending relationship can be determined to exist if the reconciliation statements recorded with account current and accounting remarks, the certificates of indebtedness, and the IOUs are sufficient to prove the occurrence of lending between the lender and the borrower. In the present case, a party enters a plea on the ground of an investment cooperation agreement signed after the execution of the private lending agreement, claiming that the private lending relationship has been altered into a partnership relationship, but he fails to produce evidence to prove his claim. Hence, he should repay the loan principal and interest as agreed in the private lending contract.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.96624823

[CLI Code] CLI.C.96624823(EN)

更多详情请关注我们的海外社交平台，有更多的双语资讯内容等着您！（PS：Facebook和Twitter需要外网访问权限）

LinkedIn

北京北大英华

科技有限公司

LinkedIn

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

Facebook

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

Twitter

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

北大法宝·司法案例库

北大法宝·司法案例库全面收录我国各级法院审理的各类案例，数据总量已达1.4亿余篇，包括司法案例、裁判规则、指导性案例实证应用、破产信息、案例报道、仲裁案例以及港澳案例等子库。在长期探索与研究中，不断拓宽案例采集渠道，深度挖掘整合案例信息，形成了指导性案例、公报案例、典型案例等丰富优质的案例资源种类，并与“北大法宝”各库之间形成立体化的知识关联体系，可满足多维度全方位的检索需求，为用户提供更便捷、更良好的检索体验。

北大法宝·司法案例库：

http://www.pkulaw.com/case/

北大法宝·英文译本库

北大法宝·英文译本库，是集中国法律法规、司法案例、法学期刊、国际条约、法律新闻等重要信息于一体，高效检索、及时更新的英文法律信息系统。由“北大法宝”翻译中心人工翻译，多重校对，更符合中文原意。翻译范围覆盖法律、行政法规、司法解释、部门规章及地方性法规，最高人民法院公报案例、指导性案例、典型案例以及国务院、各部委、各地方发布的具有涉外因素的规范性文件等等。

北大法宝·英文译本库：

https://www.pkulaw.com/english

-END-

责任编辑 | 张馨予

稿件来源 | 北大法宝英文编辑组（Mani）

审核人员 | 伍小凤 张文硕

本文声明丨本文由北大法宝原创整理，转载请注明来源。▼往期精彩回顾▼房屋买卖合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
婚姻家庭、继承纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例保证合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
劳动纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例2022年5-6期最高院公报案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
涉继承纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例涉继承纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
涉侵权责任纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例仿冒混淆不正当竞争案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
买卖合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
环境损害赔偿纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
子女抚养纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例

点击下方公众号名片

获取更多信息