英文不好，在辟谣的同时，请不要造谣，更不要洗地
今天看到一微信公众号的文章，言辞凿凿，说不能相信简体中文报道。
感兴趣的可以自己去看
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Na6yf-d9IsPsoigoEeBqFQ
里面最关键是这段
那么我们来打开这个网页，看看说了什么？
https://norwaytoday.info/news/photo-67-year-old-svein-andersen-is-the-first-norwegian-to-receive-the-corona-vaccine/
链接大家自己去看
我复制和翻译一下英文到下面：
POSTED BY: ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27. DECEMBER 2020
67-year-old nursing home resident Svein Andersen at Ellingsrudhjemmet in Oslo is the first person to receive the corona vaccine in Norway.
Nurse Maria Golding at Ellingsrudhjemmet will administer the vaccine.
Doctor Ingvild Glende Svanstrøm will also be involved in the process.
The first 10,000 vaccine doses arrived in Norway on December 26 and will be given to around 5,000 people, who will receive one dose now and one dose in three weeks, the Ministry of Health and Care Services announced.
Sunday is also World Pandemic Prevention Day.
Nursing home residents in seven municipalities in Eastern Norway will get the honor of being the first 5,000.
In total, just under 35,000 doses will arrive in Norway before the New Year. After that, there will be weekly deliveries of approximately 40,000 doses.
Nursing home residents first in line
Nursing home residents across the country are currently first in line to get the vaccine, followed by people over the age of 75.
The third category in the vaccine queue includes people between the ages of 65 and 74, as well as people between the ages of 18 and 64 with serious underlying diseases.
The vaccine must be taken in two doses at 21-day intervals to give the full effect.
The first dose of the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine was administered in Mjölby in Östergötland.
91-year-old Gun-Britt Johansson at the nursing home Boken was first out in the queue, SVT reports.
© NTB Scanpix / #Norway Today
照片：67岁的斯维因-安德森是第一个接受电晕疫苗的挪威人。
发布者：ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27: ROBIN-IVAN CAPAR 27. 2020年12月27日
奥斯陆Ellingsrudhjemmet的67岁的养老院居民Svein Andersen是挪威第一个接受电晕疫苗的人。
Ellingsrudhjemmet的护士Maria Golding将为其注射疫苗。
Ingvild Glende Svanstrøm医生也将参与这一过程。
卫生和护理服务部宣布，首批1万支疫苗已于12月26日运抵挪威，将为约5000人接种，他们将在现在和三周内各接种一剂。
周日也是 "世界大流行病预防日"。
挪威东部7个城市的养老院居民将有幸成为首批5000人。
总共不到35000剂将在新年前抵达挪威。此后，每周将有约4万剂的运送量。
养老院的居民最先排队
目前，全国各地的养老院住户都是最先排队接种疫苗的人群，其次是75岁以上的人群。
第三类疫苗排队人群包括65岁至74岁的人群，以及18岁至64岁患有严重基础疾病的人群。
该疫苗必须分两次使用，间隔21天才能充分发挥作用。
辉瑞和BioNTech公司的第一剂疫苗是在Östergötland的Mjölby接种的。
据SVT报道，养老院Boken的91岁的Gun-Britt Johansson是第一个排队的人。
© NTB Scanpix / #Norway Today
就上面的文字，然后大家再对比下这么大段的红字。
Nursing home residents first in line
养老院的居民首先要排队
Nursing home residents across the country are currently first in line to get the vaccine, followed by people over the age of 75.
目前，全国各地的养老院住户都是最先排队接种疫苗的人群，其次是75岁以上的人群。
The third category in the vaccine queue includes people between the ages of 65 and 74, as well as people between the ages of 18 and 64 with serious underlying diseases.
第三类疫苗排队人群包括65岁至74岁的人群，以及18岁至64岁患有严重基础疾病的人群。
The vaccine must be taken in two doses at 21-day intervals to give the full effect.
疫苗必须分两次使用，每次间隔21天，才能充分发挥作用。
你特么截图的内容，是你说的这个意思吗？
你自己添加了那么一堆内容，对比一下好么？
他这一堆红字，有哪些内容是我没找到“出处”的呢
1、死了的是临终关怀机构的晚期患者，没看到西方媒体报道
2、西方媒体报道死亡病人是超过80岁，被作者改成85岁
3、老人优先注射（目前只发现挪威第一批是这样，第二批就不是了，目前挪威已经注射了42000人了，其他国家不是）
4、最开始是注射了1万人而不是“两万多人”，
然后作者又来了个评论
作者估计忘了，在挪威发布死亡消息的时候，就已经确认了其中13人是因为副作用太严重导致死亡。
在新的这段内容里面，作者又一次充满了猜想。目前的公开信息中，西方疫苗注射顺序是这样：
In line with planning in the US, British front-line healthcare workers, care home residents, the very elderly and people with underlying conditions that make them particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 complications are expected to get the first doses of the vaccine.
与美国的规划一致，英国的前线医护人员、护理院居民、非常年长的老人和有基础疾病的人，使他们特别容易受到COVID-19并发症的影响，预计将获得首批疫苗。
被作者变成了“80岁以上，虚弱人群”，年岁都排出来了。
所以，说瞎话，真的不好！
实际上，西方这次导致老年人大量死亡，其实就是个事故。
根子不在挪威，而是在疫苗公司。辉瑞的疫苗试验，根本没老年人数据。
While I perfectly agree that we need full data release for those trials, I find it strange that he only mentions the Oxford/AZ in passing, for which much less and much more disconcerting data is published, changing after the political need and pandemic situation. For the less effective (62%) Oxford vaccine with half the number of participants (is also if vaccinated volunteers), 87% were under 55, and similar percentages were white, all healthy, and there is no data, how effective this vaccine is in over 65s. The others have a proven efficacy in older people. So, why you vaccinate over 70s with the vaccine with no data for its efficacy for that age group and make unsubstantiated claims that they are 70% protected after one dose for at least 12 weeks suggests that price, supply and logistics are the main criteria for the choice, NOT the protection of the vulnerable from severe disease or death. We need proper publication of all trials and the dosage/timing regime, which has turned out most effective.
虽然我完全同意我们需要全面公布这些试验的数据，但我觉得很奇怪，他只顺便提到了牛津/AZ，对于这些试验，公布的数据要少得多，也多得多，令人不安，在政治需要和疫情之后，就会发生变化。对于效果较差（62%）的牛津疫苗，参与人数只有一半（也是如果接种志愿者），87%的人在55岁以下，类似比例的人都是白人，都是健康人，没有数据，这种疫苗在65岁以上的人中效果如何。其他的对老年人有疗效。所以，为什么你给70岁以上的老年人接种疫苗，却没有数据显示其对该年龄组的疗效，并毫无根据地声称他们在接种一剂疫苗至少12周后就能得到70%的保护，这说明价格、供应和物流是选择疫苗的主要标准，而不是保护弱势群体免受严重疾病或死亡的伤害。我们需要适当公布所有试验和剂量/时间制度，哪种制度最有效。
这也是为什么挪威死亡事件出来，引发爆炸性关注的原因
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/944544/COVID-19_mRNA_Vaccine_BNT162b2__UKPAR___PFIZER_BIONTECH__15Dec2020.pdf
辉瑞公司的报告！
所以啊，还是那句话，英文不好，在辟谣的同时，请不要造谣，更不要洗地。
往期推荐