查看原文
其他

Call for Papers || Forum Kritika on Ethical Literary Criticism..

秘书处 文学伦理学批评研究 2022-04-24


国际文学伦理学批评研究会 //

Call for Papers

Forum Kritika

on Ethical Literary Criticism, Brain Text, and New Readings of World Literature

Guest Editors

Prof. Biwu Shang 

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Prof. Maria Luisa T. Reyes

 University of Santo Tomas

01



  About the Forum Kritika 



The second decade of the 21st century witnessed a quick upsurge and rapid development of ethical literary criticism, which seeks “to unpack the ethical features of literary works, to describe characters and their lives from the vantage point of ethics, and to make ethical judgments about them.” ( Nie, “Towards an Ethical Literary Criticism” 83 ) The boom of ethical criticism in the West may be gleaned from the proliferation of works by such renowned scholars as Martha Nussbaum, Tobin Siebers, Wayne C. Booth, Charles Altieri, J. Hillis Miller, James Phelan, Adam Zachery Newton, and many others. Interestingly and surprisingly, however,  contemporary Western ethical theories have been further promoted, strengthened and enriched by their Chinese counterpart, though its own ethical turn occurred two decades later and ascended against a different background.

 

Unlike moral criticism, ethical literary criticism does not simply evaluate a given work as good or bad from the vantage of today’s moral principles. Instead, it emphasizes what might be deemed to have come under the rubric of "ethical historicism"—that is, the examination of the ethical values in a given work with reference to a particular historical context or period in which the text under discussion was written. The overarching goal of ethical literary criticism is to uncover ethical factors that bring literature into existence and the ethical elements that underpin the development of characters or events in literary works. As such, it seeks to illuminate issues concerning the events, characters, their action, and other textual features from an ethical perspective, and to make an ethical judgment about them accordingly.

 

One of the theoretical models in ethical literary criticism which has gained considerable traction among its practitioners in the last several years posits that the text as the literary work’s embodiment which comes in three basic forms: brain text, written text, and electronic (digital) text. Conceived thus, brain text is a kind of text stored in the human brain and thus acquires a distinctive biological form. It mainly preserves human beings’ experience of perception and cognition through memory. Before the creation of written symbols, there appeared a wide array of brain texts displaying such salient features of literature as myth, heroic epics, folk tales, and historical narratives. To a large degree, brain text is the prototype of oral literature in its textual form, though it is not hereditary and can only be passed down orally from one generation to another. However, it is unlikely for people to perceive and receive brain text before it gets externalized orally or converted into written text which is perceived via visual and auditory organs, and the electronic text which may be interpreted with the aid of appropriate tools.

 

Brain text, as a form of text, did not only exist in the early period of human civilization or before the invention of written symbols, as might be construed; rather, it has continued to be the source of written text and electronic text. Before producing a literary work, the writer usually has the "raw materials" such as the basic story and narrative structure stored in his mind in the form of brain text, which can be generally seen as a mother text that generates various forms of literature. In other words, brain text can be fruitfully seen as a prototype of other texts. It is from the brain text that stories could be presented orally, semiotically or electronically. From this perspective, it may be said that as long as the human brain works, it will produce various brain texts. In fact, it is arguable that literary creation and circulation, either in the form of written text or in the form of digital text, cannot do without brain text. In this sense, there would be no literature without brain text. Unlike the existing conceptions of ethical literary criticism coming from both the West and the East, brain text enables critics to pin down the very mechanism of production, reception and circulation of literature. As such, it is suggested that the investigation of world literature take its departure from brain text, which may not only bring out insights about the production and circulation of world literature but also reveal what is traditionally referred to as the "moral" dimension of world literature within the framework of ethical literary criticism.  

 

To further explore brain text and its relevance to ethical literary criticism, Kritika Kultura will be initiating a forum on “Ethical Literary Criticism, Brain Text, and New Readings of World Literature,” slated for the journal’s August issue in 2022. The forum not only aims to reveal the material nature of literature and its form of brain text, but also attempts to investigate the ethical function and educational value of brain text in the arena of world literature. Contributions are invited from the perspective of ethical literary criticism and might include, but will not be limited to, the following topics:

 

1.Brain text and oral literature  

2.Brain text and moral teaching function

3.Brain text and written text

4.Brain text and literary adaptation

5.Brain text and theatrical performance

6.Brain text and the formation of world literary canons

 

Contributions should be 7,000-8,000 words in length and should follow the conventions of MLA 8th ed. The aim is to have a diversity of methodological approaches, theoretical underpinnings, and objects of study represented in the forum.

 

Proposals of 500 words maximum, accompanied by a biographical note of 150 words, should be sent to: 


Biwu Shang 

biwushang@sjtu.edu.cn

Shanghai Jiao Tong University


Maria Luisa T. Reyes 

lu2reyes2x@gmail.com

University of Santo Tomas

cc: kk.soh@ateneo.edu 


Any inquiries should be sent to the same email addresses. Proposal deadline is Aug. 1, 2020. All communication should use the subject heading “Ethical Literary Criticism.”

 

For authors with accepted proposals, the deadline for submission of the essay will be Sept. 1, 2021. Each essay will undergo double blind peer review.

02  


 About Kritika Kultura



Kritika Kultura is acknowledged by a host of Asian and Asian American Studies libraries and scholarly networks, and indexed in the MLA International Bibliography, Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Clarivate), Scopus, EBSCO, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs (ICCTP). For inquiries about submission guidelines and future events, visit 

https://journals.ateneo.edu/ojs/index.php/kk/announcement/view/115

【END】  责任编辑 | 任洁、汤轶丽

审校 | 杨革新

往 期 回 顾

会议延期通知 ‖ 第十届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会

会议通知 || 第十届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会(第一号通知会议通知 || 文学伦理学批评国际研修班(第一期)第1号通知第九届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会在浙江大学隆重开幕第九届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会在浙江大学盛大闭幕会长致辞 || 第九届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会文学伦理学批评与脑文本:聂珍钊与王永的学术对话刘茂生 ||《社会与政治的伦理表达:萧伯纳戏剧研究》
郭雯 ||《克隆人科幻小说的文学伦理批评研究》

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存