《JAE》| Ye et al:面积产量指数保险还是农作物产量保险?中国视角下的农民福利与政府补贴有效性
摘要:我们使用来自中国的农场产量数据评估面积产量作物保险(AYCI)和农场产量作物保险(FYCI)的绩效,重点关注它们对农民福利的影响,以及它们在政府补贴方面的成本效益。给定补贴率(补贴率使得参与水平达到政治上可接受),AYCI的价格优势可能不再抵消其较高的基础风险,因此FYCI可能会受到农民的青睐。从政府角度来看,AYCI是保持农民合理参保最低成本的选择,但不一定是最划算的选择。我们的研究结果表明,与许多发展中国家农业保险计划的假设相反,AYCI计划不一定比FYCI更受青睐。关于国家农业保险方案结构的决定应基于对当地条件的考虑。
关键词:面积产量作物保险;农作物产量保险;农民福利;补贴成本效益
Abstract: We evaluate the performance of area yield crop insurance (AYCI) and farm yield crop insurance (FYCI) using farm-level yield data from China, focusing on their effects on farmers’ welfare, and their cost-effectiveness in terms of government subsidy. Given a subsidy rate sufficient to generate a politically acceptable participation level, the price advantage of AYCI may no longer offset its higher basis risk, and consequently FYCI may be preferred by farmers. From the government’s perspective, AYCI is the cheapest option to maintain reasonable farmer participation in insurance, but is not necessarily the most cost-effective choice. Our findings suggest that, contrary to an assumption that informs many developing country agricultural insurance programmes, AYCI schemes are not necessarily preferred to FYCI. Decisions on the structure of a national agricultural insurance programme should be based on careful consideration of local conditions.
Keywords: area yield crop insurance; farm yield crop insurance; farmers’ welfare; subsidy cost-effectiveness.
原文链接:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12326
●《AJAE》| Yu Na Lee:价格风险厌恶会推动迁移吗?来自埃塞俄比亚农村的证据
●《JDE》| Shapiro & Mandelman:发展中国家数字化、自动化的采用和劳动力市场
●《管理世界》| 徐志刚等:新农保与农地转出:制度性养老能替代土地养老吗?——基于家庭人口结构和流动性约束的视角
●《AE》| Hou et al:风险偏好、知识、土地整理和景观多样化对农药使用的影响
●《World Development》| He et al:农村低保项目提高农村儿童教育成果
●《JRS》| Qu et al:农村住区转型如何促进农村可持续发展?来自中国山东的证据
●《World Development》| Acosta et al:应对气候冲击:牲畜投资组合的复杂作用
●《Agribusiness》| Liang & Wang:合作社作为生猪行业的竞争标准?来自中国的证据
●《World Development》|Acosta et al:城市邻近性对公共区域集体行动的中介效应: 来自中国得理论与实证
●《AE》|商品作物生产者和特种作物生产者的风险偏好:前景理论的应用
●《JRS》|Penghui et al:农田景观破碎化演化及其从农村到城市的驱动机制——以常州市为例
————END