顶刊《Journal of Accounting Research》最新刊发九篇文章!
出品@会计学术联盟(ID:KJXSLM),顶刊推送管理部、案例研究专栏;信息来源:wiley、金蓓科研;
Volume 60, Issue 5;Pages: 1647-2027;December 2022
目录
Facilitating Tacit Collusion Through Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Common Ownership The Roles of Data Providers and Analysts in the Production, Dissemination, and Pricing of Street Earnings Do Borrowers Intentionally Avoid Covenant Violations? A Reexamination of the Debt Covenant Hypothesis How Do Disclosure Repetition and Interactivity Influence Investors’Judgments? The Costs of Waiving Audit Adjustments Relative Performance Evaluation and Competitive Aggressiveness The Relationship Between Non-GAAP Earnings and Aggressive Estimates in Reported GAAP Numbers Audit Implications of Non-GAAP Reporting Limited Attention: Implications for Financial Reporting
Facilitating Tacit Collusion Through Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Common Ownership
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
ANDREA PAWLICZEK(University of Colorado)
A. NICOLE SKINNER(University of Georgia)
SARAH L. C. ZECHMAN(University of Colorado)
Abstract
We
examine whether voluntary disclosure is associated with incentives for
firms to collude. Public disclosure can facilitate collusion by aiding
with coordination and monitoring for defections. Using common ownership
(investors holding stock in competing firms) to identify reduced
incentives to compete, we find a positive association between public
disclosure and these incentives. We also find that common ownership is
positively associated with measures of disclosure that are likely to
facilitate tacit collusion and that this association is stronger in
industries where collusion is easier. Our study expands the literature
on disclosure and competition among firms by showing that public
disclosure is positively associated with incentives for tacit collusion.
This finding is consistent with managers facilitating anticompetitive
outcomes using voluntary disclosure.
The Roles of Data Providers and Analysts in the Production, Dissemination, and Pricing of Street Earnings
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
KHRYSTYNA BOCHKAY (University of Miami)
STAN MARKOV (University of Texas at Dallas)
MUSA SUBASI (University of Maryland)
ERIC WEISBROD (University of Kansas)
Abstract
In
September 2009, Thomson Reuters (TR) discontinued its practice of
relying on analysts to determine the treatment of unexpected charges and
gains in favor of their immediate exclusion from GAAP earnings.
Adopting a difference-in-differences approach, we show that this
plausibly exogenous change in TR's methodology resulted in street
earnings that are more predictive of future performance; and timelier,
more accurate, and less dispersed analyst forecasts of future earnings,
consistent with TR enhancing the properties of street earnings and
analyst forecasts. Finally, using path analysis we show that a
significant portion of TR's effect on price discovery is through its
effect on analysts; and that the change in TR's treatment of unexpected
items increased (decreased) the relative influence of TR (analysts) on
the pricing of street earnings. We conclude that forecast data providers
like TR are more than a conduit of information from analysts to
investors.
Do Borrowers Intentionally Avoid Covenant Violations? A Reexamination of the Debt Covenant Hypothesis
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
ADAM BORDEMAN (Cal Poly San Luis Obispo)
PETER DEMERJIAN (Georgia State University)
Abstract
In
this study, we replicate and extend the Dichev and Skinner [DS: 2002]
study on the debt covenant hypothesis (DCH). We start by replicating DS
and find results consistent with theirs. We then extend their work by
changing three aspects of the research design: histogram bin width,
calculation of slack, and statistical test of discontinuity. We find
that the inference from DS is generally robust to varying these choices,
although sensitive to different bin widths, during their sample period.
We extend our analysis to the period 2000–2019 and find that support
for DCH remains robust. We do, however, find a lack of support for DCH
when examining the most common financial covenant, debt-to-EBITDA. These
findings suggest a more nuanced perspective on DCH, whereby different
types of financial covenants provide different incentives and abilities
to avoid technical default.
How Do Disclosure Repetition and Interactivity Influence Investors’ Judgments?
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
NERISSA C. BROWN (NERISSA C. BROWN)
BRIAN T. GALE (University of Washington)
STEPHANIE M. GRANT (University of Washington)
Abstract
Recent
regulatory amendments aimed at modernizing disclosures and enhancing
their usefulness focus on repetition and interactivity within firms’
disclosure filings. We use two experiments to provide evidence on the
effects of disclosure repetition (repeating of information in the
filing) and disclosure interactivity (user involvement in directing the
form or content of the information displayed) on investors’ information
processing and investment judgments. Results show that repetition
increases investors’ processing of repeated information, consistent with
the informational role of repetition documented in prior research. In
contrast, repetition reduces investors’ processing of other, nonrepeated
information when the filing is less interactive. This evidence
corroborates concerns that repetition can obscure value-relevant
information from investors. However, we find that more interactive
disclosures mitigate this harmful effect of repetition on investors’
processing of nonrepeated information. Further, more interactive
disclosures lead to deeper overall processing of both repeated and
nonrepeated information, rather than more interactive disclosures
redirecting investors’ attention and processing away from repeated
information. Thus, our evidence suggests that disclosure interactivity
is an important disclosure attribute that counteracts the potentially
harmful effects of repetition on investors' processing of nonrepeated
information, while preserving repetition's informational role.
The Costs of Waiving Audit Adjustments
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
PREETI CHOUDHARY (University of Arizona)
KENNETH MERKLEY (Indiana University)
KATHERINE SCHIPPER (Duke University)
Abstract
We
analyze the disposition of auditor-proposed adjustments to financial
statements. Our analyses address concerns, expressed by regulators and
others, that auditors and their clients fixate on quantitative
thresholds and overlook qualitative factors in assessing the materiality
of discovered misstatements. Using a large sample of Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)-inspected audits, we examine the
frequency with which management records versus waives auditor-proposed
adjustments and whether waiving-proposed adjustments ha consequences for
reporting reliability and the audit process. We find waived adjustments
are linked to lower financial reporting quality measured by material
misstatements, to incentives to meet/beat earnings targets, and to the
audit process, as measured by higher next-period audit effort and fees
and higher next-period proposed adjustments. These effects on the audit
process are consistent with auditors responding to the increased risk
associated with waived adjustments. In an exploratory analysis, we find
that controlling for the amount of proposed adjustments, auditor
resignations are negatively associated with waived adjustments.
Relative Performance Evaluation and Competitive Aggressiveness
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
CHRISTOPH FEICHTER (Vienna University of Economics and Business)
FRANK MOERS (Maastricht University)
OSCAR TIMMERMANS (London School of Economics)
Abstract
We
examine the relation between incentive plans based on relative
performance and competitive aggressiveness. Using data on executive
incentive-compensation contracts in large U.S. firms, we find a positive
association between competitive aggressiveness and peer group
overlap—that is, the extent to which two firms select each other as
peers in these incentive plans. Our findings indicate that managers of
such firms take more frequent as well as more complex competitive
actions, relative to managers evaluated on relative performance without
peer group overlap. Moreover, we show that these competitive tactics are
more pronounced when managers compete against: (1) peers with similar
grant sizes, (2) peers on similar performance metrics, and (3) peers in
the same industry. Collectively, our findings provide evidence on how
widely used incentive-compensation practices relate to strategic firm
decisions.
The Relationship Between Non-GAAP Earnings and Aggressive Estimates in Reported GAAP Numbers
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
RYAN D. GUGGENMOS (Cornell University)
KRISTINA RENNEKAMP (Cornell University)
KATHY RUPAR (Georgia Institute of Technology)
SEAN WANG (Southern Methodist University)
Abstract
This
study uses a controlled experiment to examine the trade-off between
managers’ use of non-GAAP and GAAP earnings to satisfy market
expectations and how this relationship can be moderated by both formal
and informal regulatory attention to non-GAAP earnings. Our key takeaway
is that allowing financial reporting discretion in an alternative
disclosure channel, that is, non-GAAP earnings, can reduce firms’
opportunistic GAAP reporting. However, statements by regulators about
increased attention to non-GAAP earnings constrain this channel, and
this can result in more aggressive GAAP earnings management and reduced
GAAP earnings quality. We triangulate these findings with a survey and
archival analyses and find results that are consistent with this primary
message. Our study provides evidence relevant to standard setters and
regulators that non-GAAP measures may serve an important role even if
they can be used opportunistically.
Audit Implications of Non-GAAP Reporting
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
NICHOLAS J. HALLMAN (University of Texas at Austin)
JAIME J. SCHMIDT (University of Texas at Austin)
ANNE M. THOMPSON (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Abstract
We
investigate whether non-GAAP reporting affects the audit process and
thereby the quality of the related financial statements. First, we
provide evidence that auditors in numerous countries, including the
United States and the United Kingdom, rely to varying degrees on
non-GAAP profit before tax as a benchmark for determining quantitative
materiality. Then, using Premium Listed companies on the London Stock
Exchange, we document that U.K. auditor reliance on non-GAAP materiality
benchmarks often results in a higher quantitative materiality amount
and can lower audit quality. Although U.K. auditors appear skeptical of
managers’ more aggressive non-GAAP adjustments, auditors adopt more of
management's low-quality adjustments when auditor independence is
weaker. In sum, our results suggest that non-GAAP reporting can
indirectly affect investors by reducing the rigor of the financial
statement audit.
Limited Attention: Implications for Financial Reporting
Journal of Accounting Research
Authors
JINZHI LU (City University of Hong Kong)
Abstract
I
develop a theory to study the consequences of providing more detailed
information to rationally inattentive investors. I first consider a
simple data-provision problem and show that adding more data or detail
in financial statements can make it more difficult for investors to
extract information. Consequently, investors who have limited
information-processing capacity may prefer less detailed information. I
also show that when investors' decisions are complements, providing
details in addition to a summary may reduce investors' welfare. More
specifically, because of increased disclosure of details, a coordination
failure could occur in investors' attention-allocation decisions. By
showing that adding more detail in financial statements can lead to an
information overload problem for investors, this study yields valuable
insights for accounting standard setters.
国际顶刊《Journal of Finance》 2022年第12期刊文速递!
国际顶刊《The Accounting Review》 2022-97-6 期刊文速递!国际顶刊《Accounting, Organizations and Society》最新刊登四篇文章!
国际顶刊《Journal of Financial Economics》 2023年1期刊文速递!
国际顶刊《Journal of Financial Economics》 2022年11期刊文速递!
国际顶刊《Journal of Financial Economics》 2022年12期刊文速递!
国际顶刊《Review of Financial Studies》 2022年11期刊文速递!
顶刊《China Journal of Accounting Studies 》最新刊发六篇中国学者文章!
顶刊推送 |《管理世界》2022年第8期六篇会计与财务类文章
2篇FT50+4篇ABS3+三篇C刊,本硕博985院校 | 会计博士求职
4篇SSCI+1篇FT50第二轮rr,硕博211财经大学 | 财会博士求职
1篇经济研究+1篇SSCI+1篇国自科A+2篇普通C刊,博士985高校 | 财会博士求职
1篇SSCI+6篇CSSCI+本科211财务管理,硕博985高校 | 财会博士求职
1篇ABS3星+1篇国自科A+1篇SSCI二轮RR,本硕士211,博士985高校 | 会计博士求职
1篇SSCI+两篇CSSCI,博士211高校 | 会计博士求职
4篇CSSCI+本科985+硕士211+博士985 | 财会博士求职
英国雷丁大学“会计与财务管理”博士求职自荐 | 编号3A-10
1篇JCF+1篇EJF,985大学“财务学博士“求职自荐 | 编号3A-11
2篇SSCI/SCI一区+1篇SSCI二区,7篇中文核心,财会博士求职 | 编号3A-12
1篇《会计研究》+3篇其他CSSCI,985高校本科/博士 | 求职编号3A-13
1篇ABS3 星/JCR1 区+2篇CSSCI,财会本硕博211大学 | 求职编号3A-14
3篇SSCI.1区+1篇SSCI. 2区+1篇会计研究三审,211大学博士 | 求职编号3A-15
《Accounting & Finance》SSCI 一作,985大学金融学博士 | 求职编号3A-16
香港城市大学会计学博士、本/硕985大学 | 求职编号3A-17
1篇《管理世界》+6篇CSSCI,985大学经济学专业 | 求职编号3A-18
2篇SSCI+1篇SCI,211大学统计学博士 | 求职编号3A-21
4篇CSSCI+5篇SSCI在R&R(3篇ABS3星),985大学经济学博士 | 求职编号3A-22
1篇国自科A+财经大学财务金融博士,本硕会计专业| 求职编号3A-23
1篇《会计研究》+2篇国自科A+985会计学博士,本科211 | 求职编号3A-24
投稿必备!2022中科院最新“经管类SSCI”期刊分区列表!
二十四篇论文报告,CJAS 2022年第二次学术研讨会日程发布!
2022年FMS管理科学高质量期刊,最新推荐列表(中文85本)
与会计学术联盟优秀萌友一起成长,欢迎申请加入联盟志愿者服务团队。
一、招募计划
栏目助理8人,负责联盟公众平台有关栏目管理。
信息收集人员12人,负责各栏目有关推文信息收集、统计与整理。
公众号编辑人员:6人,要求有公众号编辑经验,请在申请邮件中附上已前编辑作品的链接。
以上工作地点均为线上远程工作,欢迎有意向、有时间的同学投递!
二、实习或锻炼目标
1.提高项目策划、管理及信息收集、处理能力;
2.结交联盟优秀小伙伴,为自己的成长助力;
3.以实习贡献绩点兑换联盟平台学习资源;
三、招募要求
1.喜欢联盟的圈子,做事有激情和主动性;
2.靠谱、灵活、反馈及时;
3.有想法,组织、协调能力强,沟通能力佳;
4.有班委或学生会管理或项目管理经验者优先;
5.优秀本科生,研究生、想与联盟共成长的小伙伴
6.每天学习.实习时间约30分钟。没有毅力,想凑热闹的请绕行;
7.每天有早上打卡,有考核,生活学习规律强,能坚持打卡。
8.会计学、财务管理、审计学等相关专业,本科生或研一或博士一。
有意向小伙伴,可以将对联盟平台的认识、对岗位的工作设想及个人简历,在线填写申请表单:
申请方式(在线扫码):
同时将邮件发送到联盟邮箱:Accounting_AU@yeah.net,并备注“姓名+院校+年级+专业”(注:未按照要求备注者不通过申请)
招募时间截止:12月28日下午18点
会计学术联盟—办公室2022年12月24日
因为心在
说是来为联盟平台服务的
其实,锻炼最多的还是是自己此为“成全他人,成就自己”的价值理念
用心做激发主动性和创造力你会发现你在联盟平台
学习到的,远比想象的要多的多!学习要通过眼观耳闻,身体实践和大脑思维
有了感觉,才能有所领悟!
当领悟了,才是真的进步了要想有感觉,心要常在!
希望你的加入能为联盟运营团队带来活力
打开心扉,融入团队,献出爱心,收获爱心
不忘初心:因缘分相聚,因互助成长因智慧光华
牢记使命:传播会计前辈思想引领青年一代成长!
点亮在看,为自己2023加油!
WINTER
关注会计学术联盟
为财会人智慧成长赋能
近20万高端财会人关注
前沿.会议.招聘.本硕博