SA OpenProject 178开始报名 | 建筑的生与死

关注SA公众号，不要下次一定哦！

SA专题课程

我们只做你想不到的

Studio Alpha 每月不定期推出国际设计竞赛或者由SA老师自命题的Open Project供同学们来充实自己的作品集。涉猎范围包含建筑、景观、城市设计。为了鼓励大家的互相协作，并提升学生的主观能动性，竞赛都以1-4人组队报名为单位。SA的竞赛或者Open Project 对于每个学生都可以公平报名申请，老师选拔合适的同学参与。历时从2周至6周不等，只针对SA学员，大多数在使用一对一课时兑换后即可免费参加。SA每年生源有40%来自老八校，15%来自欧美院校，45%来自国内重点大学。学员间自由组队，和志同道合、旗鼓相当的小伙伴们一起参与OP设计。

SA今年已经上线了多个专属21Fall学员的OP。SA自2019年4月24日起开始发布Open Project Plus (OP+)，在OP+的设计讨论中邀请世界上最活跃的相关领域的前沿学者或工作者，顶尖的院校教职人员来进行Guest Critic,并与同学交流。SA OP系列是我们邀请相关设计领域的最优秀学者和从业者为给同学设计和作品集水平加分的专题小班课程，我们希望需要的同学都能找到最适合自己的OP，所以在每个OP开始前都会有个双向选择的过程，帮助我们控制OP队伍的构成以获得最佳产出。

更多信息请点击SA全年专题课程月历

OpenProject 178

建筑的生与死

语音简介

Audio Intro

课程简介

Course Description

库哈斯在《癫狂的纽约》一书中写道：“从现在起，任何城市地块都需要顾及到…同时发生的不可预见的和反复无常的活动…定制‘文化’变得不再可能。”一百年前，现代主义和国际主义在建筑领域占据主导地位；从那时起，“形式服从功能”，“少即是多”，这些思想在各个学派中流传，并深深地植根于我们的心中。然而，近年来，意识形态开始变得多元化，我们目睹了现代主义主导地位的消融，逐渐对建筑的实质与建筑师的角色提出了挑战与质疑。正如库哈斯所写，在都市化的大流中，因为功能在不断变化，建筑很难再为单一目的而建造。而对于建筑师来说，通过形式来实现功能、设计一个既定的框架是很困难的，甚至是没有必要的。

在研究建筑的生与死的过程中，我们将关注当代城市背景下建筑中出现的“文化”。而后，我们将挑战建筑设计的既定观念，以及在西方和东方社会中对生死不同的态度。我们不仅会要求你们以“当今”作为设计的背景，而且会将想象延展到100年后，因此，你们的设计将被定义为“不断变化的形态”。同时，你们不应该囿于现有的对未来主义幻想中，相反，我们会要求你们自由地探索生与死的形式，也希望你们抛开“形式跟随功能”，在尝试中找到最有力的表达形式。

在课程的进程中，我们会直接而全面地考虑整个系统，找到建筑的界限，确立建筑的意义，并质疑看似固有的结果。

在这个项目中，我们将直面“城市临终关怀院”这个设计课题。在这个临终关怀院的形式下，我们将深入讨论生与死。因此，这个临终关怀院将成为众多次级发展和应对社会变革的媒介。例如，100年后，这种临终关怀院的形式会是什么样，内部和外部会发生什么变化？这种变化的关键因素是什么？这可能是你对自然灾害、战争甚至社会冲突的预测。这些“因素”也应该出现在你的研究中。

Credit：Kevin Gao

In Delirious New York, Rem Koolhaas wrote, “From now on each metropolitan lot accommodates…an unforeseeable and unstable combination of simultaneous activities…It has become impossible to ‘plot’ culture.” A hundred years ago, modernism and internationalism took dominance in the field of architecture; since then, “form follows function”, “less is more”, these ideas have been taught in schools and planted deeply in us. However, in recent years, ideologies have begun to diverge, we have witnessed the dissolution of modernism thinking, into challenging the entity of architecture and role of architects. Like Koolhaas wrote, in such a prevailing trend of urbanism, buildings can hardly be built for a single purpose because the programs keep changing. It becomes difficult, or even unnecessary for us architects, to impose functions through forms, to design a predetermined framework.

In the course of our research in the life and afterlife of the architectural study, we will focus on cultures emerging in architecture in the contemporary urban context. We will be paying attention to the challenge of stereotypes, the fundamental understanding, and the typical expectations of reviewing life and death in both western and eastern societies. We will not only ask you to appreciate such a challenge in the time frame of today but 100 years after the present mode of living. You design will be evaluated as a changing form in a span of 10o years with an evolution of existing programs. You should not to fully imagine or to be trapped in the illusion of futuristic design mythologies. Instead, we ask you to test the form of living and dying, freely. We will also expect you to not be limited to the practice of “form following function”, nor to quote yourselves on the idea of only experimenting without creating and delivering promising vignettes and architectural drawings.

At certain moments in time and specific moments of education, it is critical to consider directly and holistically the systems in which we reside, to find edges, determine relevance, and question seemingly inherent outcomes.

In this project, we will directly address the elusive topic of an urban hospice. In the form of this hospice, we will dive into a discussion of life and death. Therefore, the hospice will become a platform of many developments and media to address various types of social modifications. For example, what would be the form of this hospice after 100 years, as, what would change, internally and externally? What would be the key factor of such changes? This could be your prediction of natural disasters, war, or even social conflicts. These “causes” should be presented in your study as well.

Credit：Kevin Gao

课程时间

Duration

七月中旬开课，五周

学生人数

Number of Students

10-12人，可2人一组，仅限SA内部学员报名

课程安排

Schedule and Approach

Before Class:

1. Works:

a. Readings

b. Go Through the Syllabus

Week 1:

1.In Class:

a. Virtual Site Tour

b. Basic Conceptual Lecture

c. Goals of the Course Through Syllabus

d. Work Samples

e. In Class Discussion, Focus Group, and Brainstorming Session

f. Initial Sketch and Discussions

2. Works:

a. Readings

b. Initial Conceptual Script

c. Conceptual Site Analysis

d. Conceptual Diagrams

e. Conceptual Map Indicating Way Findings

f. Initial Sketch and 3D Model (or physical model)

Week 2:

1. In Class:

a. Review All Materials (Group Pin-Up)

b. Software Session

c. Individual Discussions

2. Works:

a. Readings

b. Finalizing Conceptual Scripts

c. Approving Site Analysis Through Diagrams and Site Maps

d. Approving 3D Model

e. Initial Plan, Sections, Elevations, and Axons

f. Sketched or Screen Captured Views and Study Physical Models

Week 3:

1. In Class:

a. Software Session

b. Individual Discussions

2. Works:

a. Preparing Md-review Materials (PS: Not a typical review at this case, no need for “finalized drawings”, but to fundamentally demonstrate a strong, thoughtful, and clear process of study summed up from the previous weeks)

Midterm Review: (Group Pin-Up)

1. Critics:

a. Yangwei Kevin Gao – Yale University – Vanke China

b. Xinyi Chen - University of Pennsylvania

c. Nate Mollway – University of Pennsylvania

d. Niema Jafari – Yale University – Gensler Los Angeles

e. Nina Yuan Meng – Pfizer – Branding and Marketing Leader/ Graphic Designer

Week 4:

1. In Class:

a. Quick Group Chat to Go Through Mid-Review

b. Individual Discussions

2. Works:

a. Finalizing Site Study and Site Maps

b. Approving all Plans, Sections, Elevations, and Axons

c. Approving 3D Model

Week 5:

1. In Class:

a. Review All Materials (Group Pin-Up)

b. Individual Discussions

2. Works:

a. Preparing Final-review Materials (Refer to Deliverables)

Final Review:

1. Critics:

a. Yangwei Kevin Gao – Yale University – Vanke China

b. Xinyi Chen - University of Pennsylvania

c. Nate Mollway – University of Pennsylvania

d. Niema Jafari – Yale University – Gensler Los Angeles

e. Nina Yuan Meng – Pfizer – Branding and Marketing Leader/ Graphic Designer

指导老师

Course Instructor

Kevin Gao

Yale, MArch

耶鲁大学建筑学硕士（Russell Moore Scholar）,伊利诺伊大学香槟分校建筑学学士，现就职于北京万科，建筑设计管理新动力，目前已积累4年SA授课经验。曾先后实践于Gensler晋斯，和Aedas凯达环球，参与多尺度国际获奖项目的概念设计、BIM深化，以及超高层塔楼立面设计等工作，并多次于国内外高校进行建筑学术宣讲和讨论会。此外，探索并积累行业外管理资源，包括长期负责PwC普华永道和Pfizer辉瑞制药品牌宣传工作，并曾任职于上海McKinsey & Company麦肯锡公司就任小企业咨询顾问一职。

善于把握作品的流行性和当代设计图纸痛点，并与学生讨论建筑与城市设计的地缘性与“生与死”的关系，从而以反映社会核心问题的方式产出专业性图纸。在学习与工作期间，建筑设计作品Turin Olympic Center, Café Elementary, Micro House Malaysia等曾多次获得国际设计奖项，包括P/A Award, YAC Gold Winner等，并多次刊登于ArchDaily，Dezeen等平台。研究型设计作品“信号塔”与“不是美术馆”合作、将收录于一条和二更等平台，致力于研究中国西南部地区艺术的差异性与独立性。

左右滑动查看更多老师作品

Xinyi Chen

UPenn, MArch

Graduated from University of Pennsylvania (M.Arch), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (B.S. in Architectural Studies). Interned in architectural firms, worked as a teaching assisstant and graphic designer, while keeping a strong interest in photography and writing. Fascinated by cross-disciplinary, cross-culture problem solving and constantly challenging the entity of architecture and the role of architects.

左右滑动查看更多老师作品

扫描二维码或点击文末阅读原文，填写留学评估，可以帮助我们更快地了解你现在的准备状态，并给予相应的建议。你所提交的信息将会严格保密。

SA留学评估二维码

22-23FALL建筑景观规划留学报名中

推荐阅读

以下OP正在报名中

StudioAlpha大巧筑人

长按二维码咨询

微信号 : StudioAlpha

电话：[phone]

点击“阅读原文”，免费留学评估