侵害商标权类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例

目录

Contents

1.开德阜国际贸易（上海）有限公司与阔盛管道系统（上海）有限公司等侵害商标权、虚假宣传纠纷案

K.D.F. Distribution (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Aquatherm Pipe System (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. et al. (case regarding dispute over infringement upon trademark rights and false publicity)

2.曹晓冬与云南下关沱茶股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案

Cao Xiaodong v. Yunnan Xiaguan Tuocha Co., Ltd. (case of dispute over trademark infringement)

3.上海高通半导体有限公司诉卡尔康公司(QUALCOMM Incorporated)等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案 

Shanghai Gaotong Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al. (case of dispute over infringement upon trademark rights and unfair competition)

一、开德阜国际贸易（上海）有限公司与阔盛管道系统（上海）有限公司等侵害商标权、虚假宣传纠纷案

K.D.F. Distribution (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Aquatherm Pipe System (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. et al. (case regarding dispute over infringement upon trademark rights and false publicity)

【裁判要旨】

经营者为说明品牌代理销售商的变化，在善意、合理的限度内使用他人注册商标，属于商标正当使用，不构成商标侵权。在如实、详细告知消费者商品销售代理商及品牌变化的情况下，新代理商在宣传中使用原代理商注册商标不会导致相关公众产生误解，不构成虚假宣传。

[Adjudication Gist]

Where, in order to explain the change of the brand agents, a distributor uses the registered trademark of others in good faith and within a rational limit, such act is proper use of the trademark and does not constitute trademark infringement. Under the circumstances that the new agent informs consumers of the change of agents and the brand in a truthful and detailed manner, its use of the registered trademark held by the original agent in the publicity activities will not lead to misunderstanding of the relevant public, and does not constitute false publicity.

【来源】：《最高人民法院公报》2019年第3期（总第269期）第44-48页

Source Note：SPC Gazette, Issue 3, 2019

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.71588808

[CLI Code] CLI.C.71588808(EN)

二、曹晓冬与云南下关沱茶股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案

Cao Xiaodong v. Yunnan Xiaguan Tuocha Co., Ltd. (case of dispute over trademark infringement)

【裁判要旨】

注册商标权属于标识性民事权利，商标权人不仅有权禁止他人在相同类似商品上使用该注册商标标识，更有权使用注册商标标识其商品或者服务，在相关公众中建立该商标标识与其商品来源的联系。相关公众是否会混淆误认，既包括将使用被诉侵权标识的商品误认为商标权人的商品或者与商标权人有某种联系，也包括将商标权人的商品误认为被诉侵权人的商品或者误认商标权人与被诉侵权人有某种联系，妨碍商标权人行使其注册商标专用权，进而实质性妨碍该注册商标发挥识别作用。

[Adjudication Gist]

The registered trademark right is a kind of mark civil right. The trademark holder not only has the right to prohibit others from using this registered trademark on identical or similar goods, but also has the right to use the registered trademark to identify its goods or services for establishing the correlation between the trademark and its goods source among the relevant public. The confusion and misunderstanding of the relevant public includes mistaking the goods using the alleged infringing mark for the trademark holder's goods or having some connection with the trademark holder, and taking the trademark holder's goods as the alleged infringer's goods by mistake or misunderstanding a certain relationship existing between the trademark holder and the alleged infringer, which hampers the trademark holder from exercising the exclusive right to use the registered trademark, thereby substantially impeding the recognition of this registered trademark.

【来源】：《最高人民法院公报》2018年第10期（总第264期）第19-26页

Source Note：SPC Gazette, Issue 10, 2018 (Total No. 264), Pages 19-26

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.10781850

[CLI Code] CLI.C.10781850(EN)

三、上海高通半导体有限公司诉卡尔康公司(QUALCOMM Incorporated)等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案

Shanghai Gaotong Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al. (case of dispute over infringement upon trademark rights and unfair competition)

【裁判要旨】

在司法实践中，判断被诉使用行为是否构成擅自使用他人企业名称的不正当竞争行为，一般应从以下几个方面予以考量：一是使用时间的先后，即被诉使用行为是否发生在他人之后；二是所属行业领域的差异，即被诉使用行为的经营范围与他人是否相同；三是主要经营地域的异同，即被诉使用行为的主要经营地域与他人是否交集。由此可知，使用时间的先后只是判断是否构成擅自使用他人企业名称的不正当竞争行为的考量因素之一，除此之外，还需综合考量其他两个因素。

[Adjudication Gist]

In judicial practice, the following aspects shall be taken into account in the determination whether the alleged use behavior constitutes an unfair competition of using enterprise names of others without permission. The first is the time sequence of use, that is, whether the alleged usage behavior occurs after the use of others. The second is the differences between or among industries or fields involved, that is, whether the business scope for the alleged usage behavior is the same to that of others. The third is the similarities and differences of main business areas, that is, whether the main business area for the alleged usage behavior intersects with that of others. It can be seen that the time sequence of use is only one of considerations in the determination whether the alleged act constitutes an unfair competition of using any other enterprise' name without permission. In addition, another two factors shall be taken into account on a comprehensive basis.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.813601

[CLI Code] CLI.C.813601(EN)

责任编辑：李泽鹏

稿件来源：北大法宝英文编辑组（Mani）

审核人员：张文硕

更多精彩，请点击菜单栏“法宝盘点-法宝原创-双语新闻”：

▼往期精彩回顾▼

客服 | 法小宝

微信 | pkulaw-kefu

微博 | @北大法宝

点击相应图片识别二维码

获取更多信息

北大法宝

北大法律信息网

法宝学堂

法宝智能