商事合同案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例

北大法律信息网 2021-09-21

目录

Contents

1. 王某（WONG）与香港中成集团有限公司（HONG KONG ZHONG CHENG GROUP COMPANY LIMIT ED）等公司股权转让合同纠纷上诉案
Wong v. Hong Kong Zhong Cheng Group Co. Ltd. et al. (appeal case regarding dispute over an equity transfer contract)

2. 德国赛锡科技有限公司（SIC Processing GmbH）等与英利能源（中国）有限公司等加工合同纠纷上诉案
SIC Processing GmbH et al. v. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. et al. (appeal case of dispute over a processing contract)

3. 中国东方航空股份有限公司与ABDULWAHEED航空旅客运输合同纠纷上诉案
China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd. v. ABDULWAHEED Airlines (appeal of case regarding dispute over a passenger transportation contract）

一、王某（WONG）与香港中成集团有限公司（HONG KONG ZHONG CHENG GROUP COMPANY LIMIT ED）等公司股权转让合同纠纷上诉案

Wong v. Hong Kong Zhong Cheng Group Co. Ltd. et al. (appeal case regarding dispute over an equity transfer contract)

【裁判要旨】

根据公司法规定，有限责任公司之间转让股权，依照公司章程中的相关规定。公司章程内容表明经董事会任命的人有权对外签署协议，其与另一方当事人签订的股权转让协议，经由其签字并加盖公司印章后符合公司章程中签署协议的规定。另一方当事人在签约时已尽到合理注意义务的，该股权转让协议合法有效。

[Judgment Abstract]

According to the Company Law, the transfer of equity of limited liability companies shall be conducted in accordance with the company's bylaws. If the content of the company's bylaws indicates that a person appointed by the board of directors has the right to externally sign an agreement, and the equity transfer agreement signed by that person with others is in compliance with the company's bylaws after it is signed and stamped with the company seal, and the other party has fulfilled its duty of reasonable care when signing the contract, the equity transfer agreement is legal and valid.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.8897879

[CLI Code] CLI.C.8897879(EN)

二、德国赛锡科技有限公司（SIC Processing GmbH）等与英利能源（中国）有限公司等加工合同纠纷上诉案

SIC Processing GmbH et al. v. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. et al. (appeal case of dispute over a processing contract)

【裁判摘要】

三方当事人订立的供货协议明确约定一方破产、丧失履约能力属于实质违约，一方实质违约后，另两方均有权解除协议。协议履行过程中一方破产、丧失履约能力的，构成实质违约。该违约方以另外两方系协议的主要权利义务方，且协议的主要义务方未破产亦未丧失履约能力为由，主张协议解除条件未满足的，法院不予支持。

[Judgment Abstract]

A supply agreement concluded by the three parties clearly stipulates that one's bankruptcy or loss of ability to perform contractual duties is a material breach of contract. Therefore, the other two parties are entitled to terminate the agreement due to one party's material breach of contract. Thus, a bankruptcy or loss of ability to perform contractual duties during the performance of the agreement constitutes a material breach of contract. Where the violating party claims that the conditions for termination of the agreement are not met on the grounds the main rights and obligations of the agreement belong to the other two parties, if the main obligor of the agreement does not go bankrupt or lose its performance ability, the court shall not support such a claim.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.10804103

[CLI Code] CLI.C.10804103(EN)

三、中国东方航空股份有限公司与ABDULWAHEED航空旅客运输合同纠纷上诉案

China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd. v. ABDULWAHEED Airlines (appeal of case regarding dispute over a passenger transportation contract）

【裁判要旨】

航空公司对因不可抗力造成的航班延误本身不承担责任。但是，航班延误之后，航空公司应当采取一切必要措施避免旅客损失。如果航空公司未举证证明其在航班延误发生之后采取了必要措施避免旅客损失，应当对旅客的损失承担赔偿责任。

[Judgment Abstract]

Airlines are not liable for flight delays caused by force majeure. However, the airline should take all necessary measures to avoid loss to passengers after a flight is delayed. If the airline fails to prove that it has taken necessary measures to avoid loss to passengers after the flight delay, it shall assume the liability of compensation for the loss of passengers.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.9698987

[CLI Code] CLI.C.9698987(EN)

责任编辑：李泽鹏

稿件来源：北大法宝英文编辑组（Mani）

审核人员：张文硕

更多精彩，请点击菜单栏“法宝盘点-法宝原创-双语新闻”：

▼往期精彩回顾▼