环境损害赔偿纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
本期双语案例推送连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会诉王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼案等有关环境损害赔偿纠纷类案例。
目录
Contents
1.连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会诉王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼案 Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City v. Wang Shengjie (public interest litigation about compensation for environmental pollution and damage) 2.江苏省人民政府诉安徽海德化工科技有限公司生态环境损害赔偿案 People's Government of Jiangsu Province v. Anhui Haide Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (dispute over compensation for ecological and environmental damage) 3. 中华环保联合会与无锡市蠡湖惠山景区管理委员会生态环境损害赔偿纠纷案 All-China Environment Federation v. Wuxi City Lihu Huishan Scenic Spots Management Committee (dispute over compensation for ecological and environmental damage)
造成环境污染危害者,有责任排除危害。行为人未经许可将工业废酸违法排放到河流中,造成环境污染,应当承担修复受污染环境的责任以排除已经造成的危害。为了达到使被污染环境得到最科学合理的恢复这一最终目标,法院可以采取专家证人当庭论证的方式提供专业技术支持。当行为人的经济赔偿能力不足时,可以参照目前全国职工日工资标准确定修复费用,按照“谁污染,谁治理,谁损害,谁赔偿”的环境立法宗旨,要求行为人通过提供有益于环境保护的劳务活动抵补其对环境造成的损害。
[Judgment Abstract]
Any person causing environmental pollution hazard shall be liable for eliminating such hazard. Where the actor, without permit, illegally discharges industrial waste acid to the river, causing environmental pollution, he shall assume the obligation of remediating the polluted environment to eliminate the harms already caused. To reach the ultimate goal of most scientifically and properly restoring the polluted environment, the court may provide professional technical support by calling in experts for testification in court. When the actor has inadequate solvency, the remediation costs may be determined by reference to the national standard for wages of employees. According to the purpose of environmental legislation “whoever produces pollution shall be responsible for its elimination and whoever causes damage shall be liable for its compensation,” the actor shall be required to make up damage to the environment caused by himself by providing labor that is good for the environmental protection.
二、江苏省人民政府诉安徽海德化工科技有限公司生态环境损害赔偿案
企业事业单位和其他生产经营者将生产经营过程中产生的危险废物交由不具备危险废物处置资质的企业或者个人进行处置,造成环境污染的,应当承担生态环境损害责任。人民法院可以综合考虑企业事业单位和其他生产经营者的主观过错、经营状况等因素,在责任人提供有效担保后判决其分期支付赔偿费用。
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.93903785
[CLI Code] CLI.C. 93903785 (EN)
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.3564435
[CLI Code] CLI.C.3564435 (EN)
北京北大英华
科技有限公司
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
-END-
继承纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
人身损害赔偿纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
离婚财产分割案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
担保合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
垄断纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例环境公益诉讼案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例房屋拆迁安置补偿合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例工伤保险待遇纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
破产纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例著作权权属、侵权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例商标权权属、侵权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
关注下方公众号,获取更多法律信息