Revised measures give clarity to movable asset security
(This article was first published on China Business Law Journal column "Banking & Finance", authorised reprint)
(1) The addition in the supplementary provisions of reference provisions for the registration of other movable property and rights guarantees, so as to satisfy the needs of market entities for registration of guarantee transactions pertaining to guarantee transactions of movable property and strengthen the positive guidance of various registration acts;
(2) The abolition of the requirement for the submission of registration agreements, enhancing registration efficiency;(3) The reduction of the initial registration term and any renewed terms to a minimum of one month, providing greater flexibility and convenience in the choice of registration term;(4) The addition of provisions on the responsibilities and obligations of the financing parties in the event of a legal dispute, specifying that the registering party bears the liability for ensuring the truthfulness of the information; and(5) The revision or addition of other provisions addressing the names of the creditor and pledgee, de-registration deadline, cancellation of registration, authority for interpretation, etc., making the language clearer and more compliant.One revision of particular significance is article 35, namely, “Where a rights holder carries out the registration of other movable asset and rights security on the registration publication system, matters shall be handled with reference to these measures. For the purposes of these measures, the term ‘security created over movable asset and rights’ means the various transaction forms of a security nature created over movable assets and rights as agreed by the parties, and provided for the purpose of repaying a debt or otherwise performing the debt obligation, including but not limited to financial leasing, deposit pledges, inventory and warehouse receipt pledges, etc., unless otherwise provided in laws or regulations.”This new provision satisfies the demand of market entities for voluntary registration of movable asset security transactions, and strengthens the positive guidance of various registration acts.The author has a certain familiarity with commercial security systems in cross-border financing security transactions of certain regions with well-developed offshore commercial systems, e.g., Hong Kong’s quick and concise charge registration procedure and transparent registration information are quite impressive.In contrast, in the mainland’s security registration system there are a great number of registrars, and their registration procedures and requirements are not all consistent; even in terms of the registration procedure and the requirements for the submission of documents for the same type of collateral, the registration requirements of registrars in different regions and at different levels of the same system also lack consistency.Furthermore, the security registration information of different registrars is incompatible, making it difficult to search information against a particular security provider of the security created over its movable asset. The entry into effect of the registration of security provided for financing usually serves as one of the conditions precedent for close of the financing, and if registration of the security cannot be completed in a timely manner, the efficiency of the close of the financing will be directly affected.Fortunately, the competent authorities of the central government are also steadily pushing forward the reform of the commercial registration system. In terms of the convenience offered by the online registration of mortgages of movable assets, on 25 May 2018 the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) launched the National Market Regulation Business System for the Registration of Mortgages of Movable Assets for trial operation. It launched the system in Beijing municipality, Liaoning province, Shanghai municipality, Jiangsu province, Zhejiang province, the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Shaanxi province and Wuhan municipality on 31 August 2018, and from there launched it nationwide on 28 December 2018.On 18 March 2019, the SAMR made the second revision to the Measures for the Registration of Mortgages of Movable Assets, and the same were implemented from 20 April 2019. They expressly provide that parties may carry out online the registration of the creation and modification, and the deregistration, of mortgages of movable assets through the National Market Regulation Business System for the Registration of Mortgages of Movable Assets. However, this system still has certain limitations, e.g., it does not include pledges of movable assets.To promote the unified registration of movable asset security, on 28 April 2019, the PBOC and SAMR simultaneously launched pilot programmes for the unified registration of movable asset security in Beijing and Shanghai, entrusting the function of registering mortgages of four types of movable assets – including production equipment, raw materials, semi-finished products and products – originally handled by market regulatory authorities to the PBOC’s Credit Reference Centre, while expressly excluding aircraft, vessels, motor vehicles and other such movable assets that fall within the scope of registration of other statutory security registration authorities.More than anything, the revised measures set out clear provisions, launching the uniform registration of movable asset security, an important step in improving the business environment. The provision to market entities of uniform, convenient and efficient registration, amendment, search, deregistration and other such services for movable asset security will be conducive to resolving the issues of the various diffuse systems for the registration of rights and interests in movable asset security, and the lack of uniformity in registration rules, and conducive to enhancing the convenience and availability of financial credit services.
合伙人
010-5809 1234
wu.jiejiang@jingtian.com
吴杰江律师1997年毕业于厦门大学法律系国际经济法专业本科。
吴律师1997年8月至2000年4月期间就职于福建九州集团股份有限公司法律事务部；2000年5月至2001年4月工作于福建厦门理海律师事务所。
吴律师于2001年5月加入北京市竞天公诚律师事务所；2006年成为北京市竞天公诚律师事务所合伙人。
吴律师的主要业务领域包括：银行与融资、收购与兼并、外商投资、项目融资、融资租赁。吴杰江律师经常代表国内外客户处理项目融资事宜、跨境担保融资等项目，其在协助有关离岸特殊目的公司的融资安排方面也格外熟练。
吴律师主要文章包括《中国项目融资法律结构的最新发展》等。
吴律师于1999年获得中国律师资格。他的工作语言为中文及英文。
吴杰江律师往期文章回顾
声明 DISCLAIMER
本文观点仅供参考，不可视为竞天公诚律师事务所及其律师对有关问题出具的正式法律意见。如您有任何法律问题或需要法律意见，请与本所联系。
This article is for your reference only and not to be deemed as formal legal advice given by Jingtian & Gongcheng or its lawyers. Please contact us directly for formal legal advice or further discussion about the relevant issues.