查看原文
其他

期刊导航 | Urban Studies文章精选(96-99)

Urban Studies 国际城市规划 2023-11-10
为了更好地传播知识,推动期刊国际合作,本刊与 Urban Studies 杂志达成网络合作,不定期推送友刊的精选文章摘要。读者们可以借此了解国际城市研究的新动向,同时学习城市研究领域学术英文的正规表达。欢迎大家批评指正。


Residential coexistence: Anonymity, etiquette and proximity in high-rise living
居住共存:高层住宅中的匿名、礼仪与亲近
 

Tamir Arviv(以色列理工学院)

Efrat Eizenberg(以色列理工学院)

首次出版时间:2021/3/30|研究论文


Abstract: This paper offers a new perspective on everyday life in an ethno-nationally mixed vertical urban setting. It focuses on the cultivation of a shared residential identity that, seemingly, can overcome the binational divide. Drawing on interviews with Jewish and Arab residents in a new middle-class high-rise complex (HRC) in Haifa, Israel, we illustrate that Arabs and Jews share many reasons for living in the HRC, reflecting similarities between these populations that are often ignored. Moreover, the physical form of the complex – including its newness and its modern, universal design – makes it a relatively neutral space free from a particular ethno-national or religious identity. Finally, while the relevant literature largely assumes that ‘anonymity’ in high-rises is a negative force, the sense of privacy it affords allows residents to manage social proximity and cultivate a philosophy of ‘live and let live’.
 
摘要:本文提供了一个新的视角,审视在一个民族混合的高层建筑城市环境中的日常生活。我们强调培养一种共同的居民身份,这种身份似乎可以克服两个民族之间的纷争。通过对以色列海法一个新的中产阶级高层综合体中的犹太和阿拉伯居民的采访,我们展示阿拉伯人和犹太人居住在该高层综合体中的许多共同原因,反映了这些人群之间经常被忽视的相同之处。此外,综合体形式——包括其新颖和现代的通用设计——使其成为一个相对中立的空间,没有特定的民族或宗教身份。最后,虽然相关文献大体上都假设综合体中的“匿名”是一种消极的力量,但它提供的隐私感使居民能面对社会邻近性,并培养“自己活,也让别人活”的理念。
 
Keywords: built environment, class, cohesion, diversity, everyday life, high rise, neighbourhood, planning, segregation
 
关键词:建筑环境, 阶级, 凝聚力, 多元化, 日常生活, 高层建筑, 街区, 规划, 隔离
 
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020975967


Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?

城市集中度对国家经济效益的变化有影响吗?

 

Roberto Ganau(英国伦敦经济学院)

Andrés Rodríguez-Pose(英国伦敦经济学院)

首次出版时间:2021/3/31|研究论文

 

Abstract: This paper uses a novel, globally harmonised city-level data set – with cities defined at the Functional Urban Area (FUA) level – to revisit the link between urban concentration and country-level economic dynamics. The empirical analysis, involving 108 low- and high-income countries, examines how differences in urban concentration impinge on changesin employment, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and labour productivity at country level over the period 2000–2016. The results indicate that urban concentration reduces employment growth but increases GDP per capita and labour productivity growth. The returns of urban concentration are higher for high-than for low-income countries and are mainly driven by the ‘core’ of FUAs, rather than by suburban areas.

 

摘要:本文使用了一个新颖的、全球协调的城市级数据集(在功能城市区[FUA]层面定义城市),来重新审视城市集中和国家级经济动态之间的联系。这项实证分析涉及108个低收入和高收入国家,研究了2000—2016年期间城市集中度的差异如何影响国家一级的就业、人均国内生产总值和劳动生产率的变化。结果表明,城市集中降低了就业增长,但提高了人均国内生产总值和劳动生产率的增长。高收入国家的城市集中回报率高于低收入国家,并且,此等回报率主要是由FUA的“中心”、而不是由郊区驱动的。

 

Keywords: cross-country analysis, employment growth, GDP per capita growth, labour productivity growth, long-run economic dynamics, urban concentration

 

关键词:跨国分析, 就业增长, 人均国内生产总值增长, 劳动生产率增长, 长期经济动态, 城市集中度

 

原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021998927



‘Fountain’, from Victorian necessity to modern inconvenience: Contesting the death of public toilets
从维多利亚时代必需品到现代的不便的“发源地”:争夺公共厕所的消亡
 
Catalina Pollak Williamson(伦敦大学学院)
首次出版时间:2021/4/6|研究论文
 
Abstract: Drawing on the politicised history of Public Conveniences in England since the 19th century, this paper traces the socio-political motives for their provision and for their gradual withdrawal in recent decades. It discusses the effects these developments have had on public mobility, and the socio-political complexity these infrastructures pose to city-making agendas. In particular, the essay highlights the notions of stigma associated with these spaces in relation to gender, body-politics and control, which led to a lack of political interest in their provision and a pattern of closures that began in the Thatcher era and has continued through later times of economic austerity. To unfold these arguments, the essay examines a series of initiatives put forward to reclaim for public use a derelict toilet in the centre of London: from the concept of an interactive site-specific intervention to raise awareness of its closure, to a campaign for its listing as an Asset of Community Value, to contest its privatisation. This case study is used to address the spatial stigma that public toilets carry as a contested locus of public sanitation and, furthermore, to highlight important questions surrounding their provision in the context of contemporary citizen-driven urban agendas. To articulate this argument, the case study exemplifies how critical spatial practices can operate as a form of pedagogical urban praxis for awareness-raising and citizen engagement, advancing a Lefebvrian ‘right to thecity’ against hegemonic neoliberal agendas.
 
摘要:以19世纪以来英国公共厕所的政治化历史为鉴,本文追溯了近几十年来公共厕所提供及其逐渐退出的社会政治动机。本文探讨了这些发展对公众出行的影响,以及这些基础设施给城市建设议程造成的社会政治复杂性。特别是,本文凸显了与这些空间相关的,性别、身体政治和控制方面的污名概念,这导致了对这些空间的提供缺乏政治兴趣,以及始于撒切尔时代并持续到后来经济紧缩时期的关闭。为了展开这些论点,本文研究了一系列倡议,这些倡议提出改造伦敦市中心一个废弃的厕所以供公众使用,其中包括针对特定地点的互动干预、以引起对其关闭的关注的概念,以及一场主张将其列为有社区价值的资产、以质疑其私有化的运动。这一案例研究旨在解决公共厕所作为争议性公共卫生场所承受的空间污名,并进一步突出在当代公民驱动的城市议程背景下、其提供所产生的重要问题。为了阐明这一论点,本案例研究举例说明了批判性空间实践如何作为一种提高认识和公民参与的教学城市实践形式,推进列斐伏尔所提出的“城市权”,从而反对新自由主义的霸权主义议程。
 
Keywords: critical play, critical spatial practice, public toilets, right to the city, spatial stigma
 
关键词:批判性游戏, 批判性空间实践, 公共厕所, 城市权, 空间污名
 
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021994705


Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city
通过智能电网想象智能城市?技术实验与想象中的低碳城市之间的城市能源未来
 
Leslie Quitzow (德国WZB柏林社会科学中心)
Friederike Rohde(德国生态经济研究所)
首次出版时间:2021/4/28|研究论文
 
Abstract: Current imaginaries of urban smart grid technologies are painting attractive pictures of the kinds of energy futures that are desirable and attainable in cities. Making claims about the future city, the socio-technical imaginaries related to smart grid developments unfold the power to guide urban energy policymaking and implementation practices. This paper analyses how urban smart grid futures are being imagined and co-producedin the city of Berlin, Germany. It explores these imaginaries to show how the politics of Berlin’s urban energy transition are being driven by techno-optimistic visions of the city’s digital modernisation and its ambitions to become a ‘smart city’. The analysis is based on a discourse analysis of relevant urban policy and other documents, as well as interviews with key stakeholders from Berlin’s energy, ICT and urban development sectors, including key experts from three urban laboratories for smart grid development and implementation in the city. It identifies three dominant imaginaries that depict urban smart grid technologies as (a) environmental solution, (b) economic imperative and (c) exciting experimental challenge. The paper concludes that dominant imaginaries of smart grid technologies in the city are grounded in a techno-optimistic approach to urban development that are foreclosing more subtle alternatives or perhaps more radical change towards low-carbon energy systems.
 
摘要:目前,城市智能电网技术方面的想象正在描绘出一幅幅诱人的图景,人们在畅想关于城市能源的各种理想而又可以实现的未来。与智能电网发展相关的社会技术想象提出了关于未来城市的主张,展现了指导城市能源政策制定和实施实践的力量。本文分析了在德国柏林人们对城市智能电网未来的想象,以及这种想象是如何由各方面联合出产的。我们探索这些想象,展示了乐观的城市数字化现代化技术愿景、以及成为“智能城市”的雄心是如何推动柏林城市能源转型政治的。我们的分析基于对相关城市政策和其他文件的论述分析,以及对柏林能源、信通技术和城市发展部门主要利益相关者的访谈,包括来自负责该市智能电网开发和实施的三个城市实验室的主要专家。我们识别了三种主要的想象,它们分别将城市智能电网技术描述为 (a) 环境解决方案,(b) 经济需要和 (c) 激动人心的实验挑战。本文的结论是,智能电网技术在城市中的主导想象是基于对城市发展的技术乐观主义态度,这种态度排除了更微妙的替代方案,或者可能是更激进的低碳能源系统变革。
 
Keywords: smart city, smart grid, urban imaginary, urban laboratories
 
关键词:智慧城市, 智能电网, 城市想象, 城市实验室
 
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211005946



以上内容源自
Urban Studies 论文快递:第九十六期
Urban Studies 论文快递:第九十七期
Urban Studies 论文快递:第九十八期
Urban Studies 论文快递:第九十九期

相关阅读
Urban Studies 文章精选(84-87)
Urban Studies 文章精选(88-91&编辑精选)
Urban Studies 文章精选(92-95)

排版 | 张祎娴

推介 Urban Studies 期刊的最新文章和城市研究的最新动态

搭建中国城市研究学者交流切磋的学术平台


UrbanStudiesJournal

微信号 :USJ_online

继续滑动看下一个

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存