期刊导航 | Urban Studies文章精选(121-124)
为了更好地传播知识,推动期刊国际合作,本刊与 Urban Studies 杂志达成网络合作,不定期推送友刊的精选文章摘要。读者们可以借此了解国际城市研究的新动向,同时学习城市研究领域学术英文的正规表达。欢迎大家批评指正。
Street markets, urban development and immigrant entrepreneurship: Unpacking precarity in Moore Street, Dublin
街头市场、城市发展和移民创业:揭开都柏林摩尔街的不稳定因素
Cristín Blennerhassett(爱尔兰都柏林大学)
Niamh Moore-Cherry(爱尔兰都柏林大学)
Christine Bonnin(爱尔兰都柏林大学)
首次出版时间:2021/9/28|研究论文
Abstract: Traditional markets represent vital spaces of opportunity for livelihood-building, intercultural contact and for developing familiarity with the city. Yet, worldwide, markets are under pressure due to redevelopment agendas driven by neoliberalised forms of urban governance. Although precarious sites of occupation and employment, markets still maintain an attractiveness for immigrant micro-entrepreneurs as a foothold into the labour market and urban economy. Through a case study of the historic Moore Street market in central Dublin (Ireland), we explore the experiences of immigrant entrepreneurs. While these may be different in terms of their familiarity with the urban, institutional and regulatory landscapes, they are not entirely dissimilar from the experiences of longer-term traders in Moore Street. However what is evidentis how precarity is tactically exploited by new comer entrepreneurs for particular reasons. These traders prize the autonomy brought by market trading and use it as a meso-scale between low-paid waged employment and higher-level employment that may be out of reach for a variety of reasons. We argue that in examining urban precarity, increased attention should be paid to exploring the context-specific nature of the processes that give rise to it as well as the agentic capacity exercised to exploit it even within structural constraints.
摘要:传统市场带来了生计建设、跨文化接触和熟悉城市的重要机会空间。然而,在世界范围内,由于新自由主义城市治理形式推动的重建议程,这些市场正面临压力。尽管市场是不稳定的职业和就业场所,但作为进入劳动力市场和城市经济的立足点,其对移民微型创业者仍然保持着吸引力。通过对爱尔兰都柏林市中心历史悠久的摩尔街(Moore Street)市场的案例研究,我们探寻移民创业者的经历。虽然对城市、制度和监管环境的熟悉程度可能有所不同,但他们的经历与摩尔街长期商户的经历并非完全不同。然而,显而易见的是,新晋创业者会出于特定原因策略性地利用不稳定性。这些商户看重市场交易带来的自主权,并将其作为介乎低薪就业与由于各种原因遥不可及的高薪就业之间的中间选项。我们认为,在研究城市不稳定性时,应该更加注重探究产生这种不稳定性的过程的、特定于其背景的性质,以及在结构性约束下人们所发挥的能动性。
Keywords: Dublin, immigrant entrepreneurship, street markets, sustainable urban development, urban precarity
关键词:都柏林, 移民创业, 街头市场, 可持续城市发展, 城市不稳定性
Spatialising urban health vulnerability: An analysis of NYC’s critical infrastructure during COVID-19
城市健康脆弱性的空间化:对COVID-19期间纽约市关键基础设施的分析
Gayatri Kawlra(美国哥伦比亚大学)
Kazuki Sakamoto(美国哥伦比亚大学)
首次出版时间:2021/10/1|研究论文
Abstract: This paper examines how fragmentation of critical infrastructure impacts the spread of the coronavirus outbreak in New York City at the neighbourhood level. The location of transportation hubs, grocery stores, pharmacies, hospitals and parks plays an important role in shaping spatial disparities in virus spread. Using supervised machine learning and spatial regression modelling we examine how the geography of COVID-19 case rates is influenced by the spatial arrangement of four critical sectors of the built environment during the public health emergency in New York City: health care facilities, mobility networks, food and nutrition and open space. Our models suggest that an analysis of urban health vulnerability is incomplete without the inclusion of critical infrastructure metrics in dense urban geographies. Our findings show that COVID-19 risk at the zip code level is influenced by (1) socio-demographic vulnerability, (2) epidemiological risk, and (3) availability and access to critical infrastructure.
摘要:本文研究关键基础设施的碎片化对纽约市冠状病毒社区传播爆发的影响。交通枢纽、杂货店、药房、医院和公园的位置在决定病毒传播的空间差异方面起着重要作用。我们利用监督机器学习和空间回归模型,研究了在纽约市该突发公共卫生事件期间,新冠肺炎(COVID-19)发病率的地理分布如何受到建筑环境中四个关键要素的空间排列的影响,这四个要素即医疗保健设施、移动网络、食物和营养以及开放空间。我们的模型表明,如果不将密集城市地理中的关键基础设施指标包括在内,对城市健康漏洞的分析将是不完整的。我们的研究结果表明,邮政编码级别的新冠肺炎风险受(1)社会人口脆弱性、(2)流行病学风险和(3)关键基础设施的可用性和可访问性的影响。
Keywords: built environment, health, inequality, infrastructure, machine learning, social justice, spatial regression analysis
关键词:建筑环境, 健康, 不平等, 基础设施, 机器学习, 社会正义, 空间回归分析
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211044304
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211045571
Jana M. Kleibert(德国厄克纳莱布尼茨社会与空间研究所,德国柏林洪堡大学)
Alice Bobée(德国厄克纳莱布尼茨社会与空间研究所,德国柏林洪堡大学)
Tim Rottleb(德国厄克纳莱布尼茨社会与空间研究所,德国柏林洪堡大学)
Marc Schulze(德国厄克纳莱布尼茨社会与空间研究所,德国柏林洪堡大学)
首次出版时间:2020/12/18|研究论文
原文地址:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020962418
搭建中国城市研究学者交流切磋的学术平台
UrbanStudiesJournal
微信号 :USJ_online