知识产权类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例

本期双语案例推送临沂润泰置业有限公司与华润（集团）有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案等知识产权类案例。

目录

Contents

1.临沂润泰置业有限公司与华润（集团）有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

Linyi Runtai Real Estate Co., Ltd. v. China Resources (Holdings) Co.,Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition)

2. 新百伦贸易（中国）有限公司诉深圳市新平衡运动体育用品有限公司等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

New Balance Trade (China) Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen New Balance Sports Goods Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal of case regarding trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes)

3. 伟星管业（北京）有限公司与浙江伟星新型建材股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

Weixing Pipe (Beijing) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding trademark right dispute and unfair competition dispute)

一、临沂润泰置业有限公司与华润（集团）有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

Linyi Runtai Real Estate Co., Ltd. v. China Resources (Holdings) Co.,Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition)

【裁判要旨】

商标法意义上的商标使用包括三个构成要件，一是必须在商业中使用，二是其目的是识别商品或服务来源，三是使相关公众得以区分商品或服务的来源。经营者未经允许，在开发、宣传、推广等商业性活动中突出使用他人注册商标的名称，起到了识别商品或服务来源的作用，使相关公众对商品或服务来源产生混淆，可以认定为商标性使用，因此，上述使用行为属于侵犯注册商标专用权。

[Judgment Abstract] 

A use of a trademark in the sense of the Trademark Law includes three elements. First, it must be used in commerce. Second, the purpose is to identify the source of goods or services. Third, the relevant public is enabled to distinguish the source of goods or services. Where an operator, without permission, highlights the use of the name of another’s registered trademark in commercial activities such as development, publicity and promotion, among others, which plays a role in identifying the source of the goods or services, confusing the relevant public as to the source of the goods or services, it may be determined as a trademark use, so the aforementioned use is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.62168835

[CLI Code] CLI.C.62168835(EN)

二、新百伦贸易（中国）有限公司诉深圳市新平衡运动体育用品有限公司等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

New Balance Trade (China) Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen New Balance Sports Goods Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal of case regarding trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes)

【裁判要旨】

共同侵权行为是指两人或两人以上共同侵害他人民事权益，应当承担连带责任的侵权行为。其构成要件有：1.行为人为两人或两人以上；2.主观上具有共同故意；3.存在过错，包括故意和过失，且不要求各侵权行为人之间必须具有意思联络。据此，实际控制人相同的多个企业混同经营，违反商标法规定侵害他人注册商标专用权，生产被控侵权产品，应认定各企业具有共同的侵权故意，构成共同侵权，应当承担连带责任。

[Judgment Abstract]

Joint tort refers to a tort in which two or more persons jointly infringe upon the rights and interests of others, and shall therefore bear joint and several liability. Essentials include: 1. There are two or more actors; 2. They share intentional intent subjectively; 3. They commit faults including deliberate intention and negligence, but infringers are not required to maintain contact under certain meaning. Accordingly, if a number of enterprises under the same actual controller are operated in a mixed manner to produce the products which are claimed to infringe upon the exclusive rights of a registered trademark of others, in violation of the Trademark Law, the enterprises at issue should be determined to share deliberate intention of infringement and constitute a joint tort, to the extent of which they should bear the joint and several liability that occurred as a result.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.11287918

[CLI Code] CLI.C.11287918(EN)

三、伟星管业（北京）有限公司与浙江伟星新型建材股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

Weixing Pipe (Beijing) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding trademark right dispute and unfair competition dispute)

【裁判要旨】

经营者使用他人注册商标作为企业名称的字号是否构成不正当竞争，应该从四个方面进行判断：其一经营者与商标权人是否属于同行业竞争关系；其二经营者是否明知是在先注册的商标，享有较高知名度属于在先合法权益的情况下仍然使用；其三经营者主观上是否具有攀附商标权人及其注册商标商誉的故意，其四经营者的行为客观上是否造成了相关公众混淆误认的后果。因此，在企业名称字号中使用他人注册商标的行为，符合上述四个要求的，就违反了诚实信用原则，扰乱了市场秩序，损害了经营者和消费者的合法权益，构成不正当竞争。

[Judgment Abstract]

In order to judge whether the use of the registered trademark of others by an enterprise in its enterprise name constitutes unfair competition, considerations should be given to: first, whether the operator is in horizontal competition with the trademark owner; second, whether the operator still uses a prior trademark which enjoys prior legitimate rights and interests arising from its high popularity; third, whether the operator, out of subjective intention, seeks connections with the trademark owner and their business reputation or popularity; and fourth, whether the operator's acts lead to subjective confusion and misleading of the public. Therefore, the act of using the registered trademark of others by an enterprise in its enterprise name complies with the aforementioned four requirements, which not only violates the principle of honesty and good faith and disturbs the market order, but also damages the legitimate rights and interests of the operator and consumers, and as a result, constitutes unfair competition.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.62144764

[CLI Code] CLI.C.62144764(EN)

更多详情请关注我们的海外社交平台，有更多的双语资讯内容等着您哦！（PS：Facebook和Twitter需要连vpn）

LinkedIn

北京北大英华

科技有限公司

LinkedIn

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

Facebook

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

Twitter

PKULaw

Chinalawinfo

-END-

责任编辑 | 吴珊稿件来源 | 北大法宝英文编辑组（Mani）审核人员 | 张文硕▼往期精彩回顾▼百万法律人都在用的北大法宝详细介绍！质押合同类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
租赁合同类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
技术合同类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
票据类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例商业秘密类型案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
涉港澳台案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例证券案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
涉外商事案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
物权案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例最高院公报案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
涉垄断类案件汇编 | 法宝双语案例
商事合同案件汇编
涉外案件争议类案件汇编
涉外案件争议类案件汇编
知识产权类案件汇编
期货类案件汇编证券类案件汇编
金融案件汇编保险合同类型案件汇编知识产权侵权类型案件汇编
侵害商标权类型案件汇编
知识产权类型案件汇编

点击相应图片识别二维码

获取更多信息

北大法宝

北大法律信息网

法宝学堂

法宝智能

点击「在看」，就是鼓励