服务合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
本期双语案例推送李嘉与北京丰禾意象教育咨询有限公司服务合同纠纷上诉案等服务合同纠纷案例。
目录
1. 北京丰禾意象教育咨询有限公司服务合同纠纷上诉案
Li Jia v. Beijing Fenghe Image Education Consulting Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over a service contract)
2.上海集毅商贸有限公司诉浙江天猫技术有限公司、浙江天猫网络有限公司技术服务合同纠纷案—网络交易中电子商户解除合同的证明责任及违约金承担
Shanghai Jiyi Commerce Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Tmall Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. (case regarding dispute over a technology service contract - burden of proof and liquidated damages of e-merchants for termination of a contract in online transactions)
3. 张铁华诉天津市第三中心医院医疗服务合同纠纷案
Zhang Tiehua v. Tianjin Third Central Hospital (case regarding dispute over a medical service contract)
一、北京丰禾意象教育咨询有限公司服务合同纠纷上诉案
Li Jia v. Beijing Fenghe Image Education Consulting Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over a service contract)
【裁判要旨】
留学生与中介机构双方基于真实意思表示签订的出国留学合同合法有效，双方应依约履行各自义务。发生争议时，当事人对自己提出的主张，有责任提供证据。中介机构能够举证证明留学生退学系其自身原因造成，且中介机构已全面履行合同义务，因此，留学生要求中介机构退还其缴纳的相关费用的，不予支持。
[Judgment Abstract]
A contract for studying abroad reached by a student studying abroad and the intermediary on the basis of their declaration of true will is legal and valid, whereupon both parties should perform their respective obligations thereunder. In case of any dispute, the party concerned should take the responsibility to provide evidence on whatever claims he files. Providing that the intermediary is able to produce evidence to testify that the student drops out of the school for his own reason, and the intermediary has fulfilled all the contractual obligations, any such claim made by the student against the intermediary for refunding of relevant costs paid theretofore should not be supported.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.10947914
[CLI Code] CLI.C. 10947914(EN)
二、上海集毅商贸有限公司诉浙江天猫技术有限公司、浙江天猫网络有限公司技术服务合同纠纷案—网络交易中电子商户解除合同的证明责任及违约金承担
Shanghai Jiyi Commerce Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Tmall Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. (case regarding dispute over a technology service contract - burden of proof and liquidated damages of e-merchants for termination of a contract in online transactions)
【裁判摘要】
在网络交易中，电子商务的售假行为具有较大的隐蔽性，难以发现、查实；且售假行为侵害了消费者的权益，将导致交易平台的社会评价降低，对交易平台的商标权利人造成难以用确切的金钱数额衡量的商誉损失；因此在合同中为防止售假等知识产权侵权行为而约定的违约金条款具有惩罚性质，违约行为所造成的损害应包括实际经济利益的损失和商誉收到贬损的损失。
[Judgment Abstract]
In online transactions, the acts of selling counterfeit products are more covert and difficult to be discerned and verified; besides, such acts will infringe on the rights and interests of consumers, lower the social comments on transaction platforms, and cause immeasurable loss of business reputation of trademark owners concerned. Therefore, the clauses on liquidated damages against intellectual property infringements formulated in a contract are of punitive nature, and the damages arising from the breach of contract should include both the actual economic loss and the loss of business reputation.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C. 8614766
[CLI Code] CLI.C. 8614766 (EN)
三、张铁华诉天津市第三中心医院医疗服务合同纠纷案
Zhang Tiehua v. Tianjin Third Central Hospital (case regarding dispute over a medical service contract)
【裁判摘要】
医疗告知义务是指医务人员在诊疗活动中，应当就病情、医疗措施、医疗风险、替代医疗方案等向患者的近亲属明确告知，并取得书面同意，充分尊重患者的自主决定权。医疗机构已经尽到医疗服务合同的主要告知义务，但没有在病情紧急突变的情况下履行进一步的告知义务，属于医疗服务瑕疵，应当就未全面适当履行医疗服务合同承担相应的赔偿责任。
[Judgment Abstract]
Medical obligation to inform refers to an obligation that medical workers should, during diagnosis and treatment, inform the immediate relatives of a patient about the condition of the patient, medical measures, medical risks, and alternative medical solutions, among others, and get their written consent while fully respecting the patient's right to make decisions independently. Where a medical institution has fulfilled its medical obligation to inform under the medical service contract, yet fails to further perform such obligation when the patient's condition gets critical in an instant, such fault should be determined as a defect in medical services. In that case, the hospital should assume corresponding compensation liability for its failure to thoroughly perform the medical service contract in an appropriate manner.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.8337185
[CLI Code] CLI.C. 8337185(EN)
北京北大英华
科技有限公司
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
-END-
最高院公报案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
劳动纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
仿冒混淆不正当竞争案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
环境损害赔偿纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
子女抚养纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
继承纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
人身损害赔偿纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
离婚财产分割案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
担保合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
垄断纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例环境公益诉讼案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例房屋拆迁安置补偿合同纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例工伤保险待遇纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
破产纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例著作权权属、侵权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例商标权权属、侵权纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例
关注下方公众号，获取更多法律信息