查看原文
其他

书讯 | 张伟年博士《以语类为视角的英语教材评价》出版

国防科大出版社 应用语言学研习 2022-06-09

欢迎点击上方关注我们,欢迎转发此文

 

近日,国防科技大学张伟年副教授的英文专著《以语类为视角的英语教材评价》由国防科技大学出版社出版发行。2018年该著作入选出版社出版选题计划项目。张伟年副教授的专著是其博士论文,指导教师是李战子教授。

李战子教授评价该专著“从语类角度进行英语教材评价,不仅对英语教材的编撰和英语教学法具有实际的意义和价值,而且为文化模式和语类知识的学习和教学提供了新的视角,对教学中文化意识和语类意识的培养有重要意义。其创新体现在两个方面:理论视角上,作者能够把多种理论进行有效合建立教材研究框架;实际研究上,作者对中外六套知名教材进行全面具体的分析。这在国内英语教材研究中当属罕见。”

中国ESP专业委员会副会长、享受国务院特殊津贴专家、北京语言大学语言服务研究院首席教授王立非评价道:“作者熟悉教材评价的各种理论,能够对这些理论提出批判性的观点,并以系统功能语言学的主要思想及文化模式理论为基础构建英语教材分析框架,所进行的分析能够有力地说明其研究框架的可行性以及英语教材评价中意识形态这一参考值的重要性。”

中国语言学会语言政策与规划专业委员会会长、《语言战略研究》主编、北京语言大学李宇明教授也对该专著高度赞扬,认为“体现了作者对系统功能语言学和叙事学理论的熟练掌握,通过构建英语教材评价的新框架,分析语类类型、子语类类型和文化模式,揭示英语教材中所隐含的意识形态。研究思路清晰、方法新颖、引证资料丰富准确、研究分析深入、结论令人信服。”


前言 Preface

 

English language teaching (ELT) textbook evaluation has increasingly attracted widespread attention. This book reviews the study of ELT textbook evaluation from different perspectives: the Empirical Perspective; the Linguistic Perspective; the Cultural Perspective; the Sociolinguistic Perspective. The above theories evaluate textbooks from the different perspectives with their own focuses and advantages. This study has established a new framework of ELT textbook evaluation from Systemic Functional generic perspective, according to the aforementioned overview of the ELT textbook evaluation theories and the understanding of genre theory and the theory of cultural model in order to decode the genre system and ideology in ELT textbooks.

The new framework has also accepted Bernstein and Martin’s definition of Ideology and thus reconstructed the ideology in ELT textbooks through analysis of genre types, appraisal resources and cultural models. Ideology shapes coding orientations, distributes control over the privileged genres of modernism, the patterns of distribution of material and semiotic resources in a society. Ideology is a way in which relationships are made and realized, exists in every level of semiosis and takes roots through language in social context (Bernstein, 1996:31; Martin, 2005: 17, 18). Conversely, all these relations and meaning making resources as a whole can reveal how ideology is constructed.

Genre types, appraisal resources and cultural models are such relations and meaning making resources. Cultural models are “our first-thoughts or taken-for-granted assumptions about what is typical or normal.” “It is part of the function of cultural models to set up what count as central, typical cases, and what count as marginal, non-typical cases.”(Gee, 1999:59)

Gee (ibid: 68-69) distinguishes between cultural models based on how they are put to use and on the effects they have on us:

Espoused models, that is models which we consciously espouse;

Evaluative models, that is models which we use, consciously or unconsciously, to judge ourselves or others; 

Models-in-(inter)action, that is models that consciously or unconsciously guide our actions and interactions in the world.


Appraisal resources also set up the rules about centrality and marginality, typicality and non-typicality, and normality and abnormality. Appraisal resources are the important part in interpersonal meanings and also the core of cultural models. The appraisal resources are the key to study cultural models, which both reflect what ideology conveys.

This study is theoretically based on systemic functional genre theory for the following reasons:

1)  Genre is responsible for coordinating the recurrent configurations of meaning in a culture. Culture is mapped as a system of genres, as “staged goal-oriented social processes” (Martin, 1986:246) Patterns of social organisation in a culture are realised as patterns of social interaction in each context of situation, which in turn are realised as patterns of discourse in each text. (Martin, 2005:9)

2)  Genre is the interface of ideology and language (Martin, 1992: 495-496) and is the way of exploiting language to accomplish different tasks enacted by culture (Eggins & Martin, 1997:236).

In this study ELT textbooks will be deconstructed as systems of genres and systems of cultural models, and ideology which the systems construe in the textbooks will be analyzed.

According to the above theoretical foundations, this study proposes a new ELT textbook evaluation framework. This framework describes and interprets two planes of relations within ELT textbook evaluation system, in which both syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations are considered. The two planes of relations are main genre plane and sub-genre plane. In main genre plane, paradigmatic options of cultural models and appraisal resources and syntagmatic options of generic types are considered. The paradigmatic options of cultural models are the same as the units in the same position in language structure. These units have same functions and can be substituted. Although the cultural models are different, they can be substituted in the same position in language structure because of their same characters and functions and they make different meanings after substitution. The relation among the different cultural models is paradigmatic relation, which comes into being not because these different cultural models have to appear simultaneously in the same structure, but because they all belong to the category of ideology and they make relations due to their similarities and differences.

In different ELT textbooks, different genre types are selected. Why some genres are privileged and how they are maintained, distributed and challenged are the consequences of the choice of cultural models. The privileged use of some genres and the maintenance and distribution of the symbolic control should be taken into account in ELT textbook evaluation. All these meaning making resources can reveal how genres construct meanings. The relations among the constituents of genre types are syntagmatic relations. The relations between genre types and the constituencies are the relations between whole and parts, just like cooccurrence relations in syntagmatic relations. So in ELT textbook evaluation it’s proper to put the study of genre types in the dimension of syntagmatic relation.

The two dimensions of paradigmatic choices of cultural models and syntagmatic choices of genre types are combined together as a whole system to reveal more clearly the ideology and the relations among genre types in ELT textbooks: what kind of ideology is reflected and how the chosen genres are related with each other in the textbooks.  

Sub-genre plane analysis of ELT textbooks includes paradigmatic options of cultural models in sub-genres of ELT textbooks and syntagmatic options of genre family members. In this plane, cultural models will be analyzed in paradigmatic dimension, while genre family members in syntagmatic dimension. In Systemic Functional Linguistics paradigmatic relations are foregrounded, and each feature in a system is realised as ‘syntagm’. The syntagms are given functional labels, which describe as a whole the contribution they make to syntagmatic structure (Martin & Rose, 2008:20). The different cultural models are taken as the features in system of ideology, which are realized as “syntagms” ---- genre family members, so cultural models guide the choices of genre family members. This also makes sense why we study cultural models in paradigmatic dimension while genre types in syntagmatic dimension and combine them to analyze ELT textbooks. The two planes and two dimensions of cultural models and genre types make a whole to reflect genre relations and ideology which ELT textbooks convey to the learners.

In order to prove the feasibility and practicality of the new framework, we choose six sets of ELT textbooks as samples and then make a detailed description and explanation about genre types, cultural models, appraisal resources and ideology in the textbooks.

There are four major findings that we have obtained from the research. Firstly, ideology is a useful tool to analyze ELT textbooks. It can be reflected through genre types, genre relations, appraisals and cultural models. All these meaning making resources as a whole construct ideology.

Secondly, this study has emphasized the role of ELT textbooks from Systemic Functional generic perspective and generalized more roles of ELT textbooks as the following: (1) a resource of genres, generic structures and generic systems, which reflect an integration of content, form, function and context of situation; (2) a resource of culture mapped with systems of genres and cultural models, which construct meaning, value and ideology; (3) a resource of learning how language functions in specific contexts and how language is used to achieve purposes.

Thirdly, this study has established a new framework of ELT textbook evaluation from this perspective according to genre theory, and the theory on cultural models in order to decode genre system, cultural models and ideology in ELT textbooks.

Fourthly, the phenomenon exists in ELT textbooks that the distribution of cultural models and genre types and sub-genre types is unbalanced. There is sharp difference of the number of the same genres, the same sub-genres and the same cultural models in the six sets of ELT textbooks. The unbalanced introduction of cultural models and lack of genre consciousness in ELT textbooks will lead to unbalanced distribution and control over the privileged genres and incomplete coding orientations of college learners. The variety and the sum total of genre types and cultural models serve as the concrete realization of culture and ideology.

The new framework of ELT textbook evaluation from SFL generic perspective can facilitate English learning and teaching, and also can offer insights into the ways of teaching and learning genres in recontextualized teaching situation, into the understanding of English social and cultural knowledge and into the enhancement of the ability of discourse and genre analysis, into the future direction of the writing of textbooks and upgrading the quality of textbooks.



封底介绍:


This book has established a new framework of ELT textbook evaluation from systemic functional generic perspective, according to the overview of the ELT textbook evaluation theories and the understanding of genre theory and the theory of cultural model, in order to decode the genre system and ideology in ELT textbooks. The new framework can facilitate English learning and teaching, and also can offer insights into the ways of teaching and learning genres in recontextualized teaching situation, into the understanding of social and cultural knowledge of English-speaking countries, into the enhancement of the ability of discourse and genre analysis, and into the future direction of writing textbooks and upgrading their quality.

图文编辑:应用语言学研习 梁国杰


相关文献延伸阅读(研习人指引)

敬告:本公号友情提供相关书讯或书目索引链接,

以便爱书人前往第三方平台选购





语言学图书精选推荐


推荐阅读:
汉语国际教育怎么办?大咖云集出谋划策(李宇明、刘利、王甬、吴应辉、王辉…)
推荐 | 一文讲清国家社科基金和教育部人文社科项目
推荐 | 图解高校教师职称评价基本标准
选题宝 | 如何准确找到国家社科基金申请书选题的切入点
重磅 | 中国知网发布2020年中国最具国际影响力人文社科期刊
教育部:国学、中国文化经典教育、书法学等交叉学科正式设立
吴勇毅:国际中文教育“十四五”展望
张辉 张艳敏 | 批评认知语言学:理论源流、认知基础与研究方法
冯志伟:关于“第三人称数据”的观察和检验 | 序陆晓蕾 倪斌《Python 3:语料库技术与应用》
人人字幕组:网络时代的知识布道者(和读后感)
文科生可以学会的Python——雷蕾《基于Python的语料库数据处理》
大数据分析:2021国家社科项目指南最新选题方向和热点,项目申请重要参考
2021年国家社科基金申报通知的四个新变化
教育部人文社科基金 vs 国家社科基金
2020人大复印资料语言学·文学类最受欢迎文章集萃
教育部语信司 | 夹用英文的中文文本的标点符号用法(草案)
【收藏】2021年国家社科基金申请书撰写参考模板
聚焦 | 2020年度中国十大学术热点画像!
外语教学:国别和区域研究专题 |《外语学刊》
《2021微信表情包使用指南(古文版)》出炉!
一个时代的转身:川普离任演讲 + 拜登就职演讲(视频 + 中英全文)
教育部:全球有70个国家将中文纳入国民教育体系
近五年国家社科基金年度项目 语言学立项名单一览
近四年国家社科青年项目“语言学”类立项名单一览
译词 | 64个跨文化核心词(含中英释义)
黄友义:疫情之后看外语和翻译的多与少 |《中国外语》
乔姆斯基:语言学的“当时”和“现在”
陈平:语言交叉学科研究的理论与实践
陈平 | 交叉学科教学与研究:做什么,怎么做?
刘海涛:学科交叉是发现语言规律的利器
吴应辉 梁宇:交叉学科视域下国际中文教育学科理论体系与知识体系构建
吴应辉:汉语国际教育面临的若干理论与实践问题
图说孔子学院新机制 新模式 | 2020孔子学院合作论坛主旨发言
孔子学院:践行《世界文化多样性宣言》的东方典范
荐书 | 潘艳艳《多模态国防话语的认知批评研究》附胡壮麟教授、张辉教授序
多模态视野下的国家媒介形象:概念与特征 | 中国社会科学报
新书 | 顾曰国 黄立鹤:《老年语言学与多模态研究》
心理语言学系列论坛预告(1月13-3月24日)
视频+全文| 马斯克专访,远见令人震撼!语言是人类最伟大的发明
语言学领域有哪些令人“毛骨悚然”的理论?
刘英凯:归化——翻译的歧路
刘英凯:信息时代翻译中“陌生化”的必要性和不可避免性
交流 | 那些隐藏在高校“文学院”中的“自然语言处理”专业
李晨阳:关于新时代中国特色国别与区域研究范式的思考
推荐 | 第二语言教学法主要流派全收录(值得收藏)
重磅!《大学英语教学指南(2020版)》正式出版!
《新时代的中国国际发展合作》白皮书(全文)
国外语言学学科眼动研究: 现状与前瞻( 1934-2020)
专访 | 乔姆斯基:知识分子沉默不语是一种罪恶
沈家煊:“能简则简”和“分清主次”——语言研究方法论谈
李强:关于区域与国别研究方法论的思考
神经语言学国际热点与趋势的科学知识图谱分析
学者聚焦 | 潘文国:徜徉在中外古今之间
学者聚焦 | 文秋芳:对外语专业学生思辨能力培养的四点建议
姜望琪:Halliday的语篇衔接理论 |《语篇语言学研究(第二版)》
重磅 | 2020中国学术期刊影响力指数及影响因子排行榜(语言文字)
教育部人文社科研究项目语言学立项趋势及申报建议 ( 2009-2019)
重磅 | 全国高校拟新增语言类专业硕博学位点名单(语言服务最新整理版)
新书 | 王军:《衔接的认知语用研究》 商务印书馆
【高端笔谈】外国语言文学学科高质量发展的路径
邢向东:论语言研究中的问题导向
国内生态学视角外语教学的特征和趋势 ——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析
以深度教学促进外语课程思政 |《中国外语》2020(5)
干货 | 国家标准:公共服务领域英文译写规范(附电子版下载)
冯志伟:当前计算语言学发展的几个特点 | 中国社会科学网
重磅 | 2020中国学术期刊影响力指数及影响因子排行榜(语言文字)
圣杯就在眼前:“现代语言学之父”乔姆斯基的批判与期望
世界语言谱系及语种概览 | 语言学微课堂
陈平 | 理论语言学、语言交叉学科与应用研究:观察与思考
马会娟:中国翻译理论研究回顾与展望
徐锦芬 曹忠凯:国内外外语 /二语课堂互动研究
韩晔 高雪松 | 国内外近年线上外语教学研究述评:理论基础、核心概念及研究方法
近十年国际语言政策与规划研究热点与趋势——基于Scopus数据库的可视化分析
中国英语教育四十年反思及其对新文科背景下英语专业建设的启示
报告全文 | 教育部高教司司长吴岩:积势蓄势谋势 识变应变求变 全面推进新文科建设
王学典:何谓“新文科”?
新文科建设|新文科建设宣言。
海外中国学研究机构名录一览表(2020年版)
干货 | 3000个常见公共场所英语标示!(国家英文译写规范)
李宇明 郭熙 周洪波 | 中国语言生活研究十五年
讲座视频 | 沈骑:后疫情时代的国家话语能力规划
张伟年 段宛云等:战略传播学视阈下特朗普涉华新冠肺炎污名化推特分析
语言专业师生必看的10部电影(附观看链接)
蔡基刚:应急语言服务与应急语言教学探索
大汇总 | 第1 - 10批推荐使用的外语词规范中文译名(附Word版下载方式)
中国外语院校本科教学质量报告(2019)
何莲珍:新时代大学英语教学的新要求——《大学英语教学指南》修订依据与要点
向明友:顺应新形势,推动大学英语课程体系建设—《大学英语教学指南》课程设置评注
文秋芳教授:中国外语教学70年,未来道路究竟向何方?
南开大学外国语学院教职工招聘与人才引进公告(2021版)
重磅 | 2020软科中国最好学科排名出炉(中国语言文学 & 外国语言文学)
书讯 | 利奇《语用学原则》中译本出版
Fodor《心理语义学》:在心灵与语言之间
精选 | 应用语言学研习丛书(13种)一览:回顾经典 分析热点
束定芳:大学英语教学与国际化人才培养 |《外国语》2020年第5期
陈力:西方现代教学理论真的反对语法教学吗?
接触理论:生成语法研究的新进展 | 中国社会科学报
荐书 | 徐烈炯著《生成语法理论:标准理论到最简方案》
合辑 | 双语版《美丽中国》( Amazing China ):1-58集(全)
对外汉语专业常用资料库大全
收藏!76种学术研究必备科研工具
梁茂成 | 语料库语言学研究的两种范式:渊源、分歧及前景
麦蒂森论翻译 | 系统功能语言学与翻译研究
荐书 | 北京大学出版社语言学图书书单
视频 | 听胡壮麟教授讲《语言学教程》那些事儿
中国访谈丨北京外国语大学校长杨丹:培养跨文化交流引领者
戴炜栋 胡壮麟 王初明等:新文科背景下的语言学跨学科发展
戴炜华  吴国玢:论语言学的跨学科研究
大师课程 | 乔姆斯基等:语言,思维和大脑
王缉思:浅谈区域与国别研究的学科基础
21世纪以来中国的太平洋岛国研究:历史、现实与未来
程琪龙:语言研究的超学科意识 |《外国语》2020(2)
视频 | TED Ed:语言进化编年史
李建波 李霄垅 | 外国文学和国别与区域的交叉研究:国情研究专家的视角
陈坚林:试论人工智能技术在外语教学上的体现与应用
荐书 | 德古意特认知语言学研究丛书+应用丛书(13种)
外语教学类高被引论文排行榜 TOP 10
“国家形象研究”高被引论文排行榜 TOP 10
蔡基刚:学术英语? 通用英语? 对学术英语再认识
高雪松 : "人文 vs. 工具" 也许是过去四十年外语教育大辩论中的伪命题
中英文学科、专业名称对照
多位著名专家学者分享英语学习方法
乔姆斯基:三个讲座,国内少见
视频 | Metaphors We Live By 内容导读 (我们赖以生存的隐喻)
多模态话语分析:以“疫情防控外语通”为例
《牛津英语》语法大讲堂(视频全集)
所以,什么是语言学?| 语言学微课堂

扫码关注,即可获取最新入群二维码

目前已有2.22万语言文学、国别区域

研习者关注↑↑↑本公众号,

欢迎加入我们,交流分享,共同学习!

一个,点亮在看

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存